[Speculation] Sage to the Jets?

[cadams]

There are plenty of serviceable backups available right now. I would trade Sage right now if I could without a second thought.

[BigBull]

Originally Posted by cadams

There are plenty of serviceable backups available right now. I would trade Sage right now if I could without a second thought.

X2
Of course that means no more bad ints from Sage. Oh well I guess I could live even though I would miss them so much.

[dalemurphy]

Originally Posted by BigBull

X2
Of course that means no more bad ints from Sage. Oh well I guess I could live even though I would miss them so much.

I would love to see this list on inexpensive, easy-to-get backup QBs that don't throw picks!

[nero THE zero]

Originally Posted by dalemurphy

I would love to see this list on inexpensive, easy-to-get backup QBs that don't throw picks!

Craig Nall's never thrown an interception.

Seriously though, do you know how ridiculous it sounds to sit here and plead how desperately we need our back-up QB? If you can't pawn your back-up anything for picks than you have no place talking playoffs, much less your back-up QB.

[barrett]

Originally Posted by nero THE zero

Craig Nall's never thrown an interception.

Seriously though, do you know how ridiculous it sounds to sit here and plead how desperately we need our back-up QB? If you can't pawn your back-up anything for picks than you have no place talking playoffs, much less your back-up QB.

how do you reach this conclusion? How are you equating the ability to trade a backup with being a playoff team? If anything the opposite would be true in that a playoff team is able to trade away draft picks to pick up role players needed in the short term.

This team and this staff are starting to feel pressure to win now. They don't get another free throw away year. So I don't see a deal going down unless it makes us a better team next year and no way does a 5th round pick do that.

[Roy P]

Originally Posted by barrett

So I don't see a deal going down unless it makes us a better team next year and no way does a 5th round pick do that.

Really?

You don't think we could get a player who contributes in the 5th round? Or are you simply saying that we can't get a 5th round QB who would be as "dependable" as Sage? I think I could find a couple of 5th rounders who might compete for a starting position on this team, how sad is that?

Bear Pascoe
Matt Shaugnessy
Lawrence Sidbury
Corvey Irvin
Dannel Ellerbe
Cedric Peerman
AQ Shipley
CJ Spillman
Andy Kemp

Heck, Marlon Lucky is rated as undrafted and he'd probably add more into the W column than Sage.

[barrett]

Originally Posted by Roy P

Really?

You don't think we could get a player who contributes in the 5th round? Or are you simply saying that we can't get a 5th round QB who would be as "dependable" as Sage? I think I could find a couple of 5th rounders who might compete for a starting position on this team, how sad is that?

Bear Pascoe
Matt Shaugnessy
Lawrence Sidbury
Corvey Irvin
Dannel Ellerbe
Cedric Peerman
AQ Shipley
CJ Spillman
Andy Kemp

Heck, Marlon Lucky is rated as undrafted and he'd probably add more into the W column than Sage.

NFL teams sink thousands of man hours and millions of dollars into scouting and regularly blow 1st round picks, and yet you are confident you can tell which UDFAs will add to the win column? Talk about the definition of Hubris. The best you can do is work hard to research the publicly available internet data and take a guess. I am confident after years of watching your posts that you do indeed do the best anyone could possibly do in the circumstances, but you are still levels below the guys making the actual picks (mostly due to resources and personal access to players). And they blow it all the time. You are pretending if you think you know what 5th rounders make us better next year.

As for Sage. Kubiak is coaching for his job, and our backup QB will be on the field next year if history is an indicator. Sage has shown himself to be a good NFL backup (no more, no less). We would be hard pressed to improve at that position if we dealt him, and we are not going to turn our team around next year for the 5th you guys advocate taking.

If we had a young coach with a longer leash I'd say Sage is gone in the name of young talent. But as it is, I just don't see them pulling the trigger for a low round pick.

[dalemurphy]

Originally Posted by Roy P

Really?

You don't think we could get a player who contributes in the 5th round? Or are you simply saying that we can't get a 5th round QB who would be as "dependable" as Sage? I think I could find a couple of 5th rounders who might compete for a starting position on this team, how sad is that?

Bear Pascoe
Matt Shaugnessy
Lawrence Sidbury
Corvey Irvin
Dannel Ellerbe
Cedric Peerman
AQ Shipley
CJ Spillman
Andy Kemp

Heck, Marlon Lucky is rated as undrafted and he'd probably add more into the W column than Sage.

If there's a guy we like in the 5th round, I'd rather just trade down 4 spots in the 1st and pick up a 3rd and a 5th... or, trade down in the second 3 spots and pick up a 5th. Makes a lot more sense than turning a strength (QB depth) into a weakness for pick #145 in the draft. By the way, how have these draft picks helped the team:

Brandon Harrison
Brandon Frye
Frank Okam... those are our 5th rounders since 2006- I would not trade Sage Rosefels for any of those guys, and I was a huge fan of Brandon Frye going into last season.

[Keith]

Originally Posted by barrett

So I don't see a deal going down unless it makes us a better team next year and no way does a 5th round pick do that.

So you're saying Sage makes the Texans better? I have to think about that one myself actually.

Even if he does, it seems a bit presumptuous to think there isn't another UFA who might be just as serviceable if needed in 2009. A few potential UFAs that might work well here as a #2 (in additional to whatever trade compensation the team would get for Rosenfels): J.P. Losman, Patrick Ramsey (who had been pursued by the Texans once upon a time), J.T. O'Sullivan, Jeff Garcia (also once pursued by the Texans), Charlie Frye, Kyle Boller, Byron Leftwich...

I can understand that there might be some unbridled Sage love around here, but I think the "step down" to any of these is a pretty short one, esp if you give that Texans warroom a shot at another draft pick.

I just find it REALLY hard to believe that any team is asking the Texans for Sage just hoping he might come in to compete as a starter, including the Jets. If I were the Jets, I think I would prefer rolling the dice with either Ratliff or Clemens than try to bring in Rosenfels.