IntheBullseye.com  

Go Back   IntheBullseye.com > Hot Reads ...In the Bullseye > The Texans
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-26-2008, 10:32 AM
cadams cadams is offline
Regular Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 461
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by papabear View Post
...but he was getting carries. The running game has been most effective when Green's been able to contribute too.
and the passing game has been more effective when the QBs haven't turned over the ball. Unfortunately, neither your point or my point are a consistent staple of the offense. (sorry, i am a smart*ss)


For the record, I agree with you on Green, which is why I didn't include Slayton. I thoguht about including him, but I agree that when Green is healthy the offense clicks better. They need a compliment back to go with Slayton to keep him from wearing down. You can argue that Green was a mistake, but that is a completely seperate discussion.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-26-2008, 10:58 AM
mussop mussop is offline
Regular Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: livingston
Posts: 360
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cadams View Post
and the passing game has been more effective when the QBs haven't turned over the ball. Unfortunately, neither your point or my point are a consistent staple of the offense. (sorry, i am a smart*ss)


For the record, I agree with you on Green, which is why I didn't include Slayton. I thoguht about including him, but I agree that when Green is healthy the offense clicks better. They need a compliment back to go with Slayton to keep him from wearing down. You can argue that Green was a mistake, but that is a completely seperate discussion.
I dissagree. IMO with an fresh Slayton this offense clicks better. We are definatly a more dangerous offense with Slaton.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-26-2008, 11:03 AM
barrett barrett is offline
All-Pro
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 2,902
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mussop View Post
I dissagree. IMO with an fresh Slayton this offense clicks better. We are definatly a more dangerous offense with Slaton.
You bolded the wrong part of Cadams' post. Right after what you bolded to disagree with, he says that Green's value is as a compliment to slaton to keep slaton fresh. Read the whole post next time and you may realize you don't actually disagree.

I think you guys are all right. Slaton is the man. He is helped out and performs best when Green can take some of the carries off his shoulders to keep him fresh. This should be a priority next year in the draft (I know...one of about a hundred we have). I hope we spend a 3rd/4th on a back who can be our short yardage/big back complement to slaton.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-26-2008, 11:09 AM
barrett barrett is offline
All-Pro
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 2,902
Default

And I seriously don't know what young guys you want playing. We already start a rookie at RB, LT, LB. All of whom started for us in their first healthy month in the NFL. We start a safety who was hurt for his 1st year and is in his rookie campaign in year two. Additionally, Dominique Barber got healthy and has immediately seen playing time. Doesn't look like a problem playing young guys to me. Looks like a problem with what they see from Molden in practice.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-26-2008, 01:36 PM
cadams cadams is offline
Regular Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 461
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by barrett View Post
You bolded the wrong part of Cadams' post. Right after what you bolded to disagree with, he says that Green's value is as a compliment to slaton to keep slaton fresh. Read the whole post next time and you may realize you don't actually disagree.

I think you guys are all right. Slaton is the man. He is helped out and performs best when Green can take some of the carries off his shoulders to keep him fresh. This should be a priority next year in the draft (I know...one of about a hundred we have). I hope we spend a 3rd/4th on a back who can be our short yardage/big back complement to slaton.
You are correct. The offense clicks better because green can take some of the load and adquately perform, which helps keep slayton fresh. I agree with your last sentence as well. If they can pick up a solid one cut and go rb in the 3rd or 4th round next year that weighs in somewhere in the 220-235 range that would be perfect.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:48 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.