![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Conveniently omitting
Quote:
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Bob, you either have serious reading comprehension problems or you just unashamedly lie to make the facts fit the narrative you're most comfortable with. Last edited by barrett; 04-12-2017 at 11:49 PM. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Would you be happier right now if we had taken Bridgewater or Bortles over Clowney? We took Kevin Johnson at #16 the following year and the next QB taken after him was Garrett Grayson at #76. Do you want him? Last year, they took Jacoby Jones 2.0 but they thought they already had their QB of the future so they loaded up on pass catchers. Should they have drafted Paxton Lynch or Christian Hackenberg?
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
So would you trade for him now, knowing the Patriots want a #1 pick in return?
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
If all they want is #25, then I lean heavily yes...I'd trade for him. I'd put him above any of the QB prospects.
If they want #25 plus another 1st next year I would need to really think about it (especially since we'd have no 2nd rounder next year either). |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
The main value of a rookie QB is they are cheap. Even a 1st round pick is about a quarter of a low end starter salary wise. And yes Bob. I would have been happier if they tried to draft a QB and failed. Getting a great QB in this league is hard and usually involves a fair amount of luck. There is no shame in not having one. It is admirable to build a quality team without one. But it is beyond comprehension to let year after year pass without investing draft picks in the QB position. |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|