IntheBullseye.com  

Go Back   IntheBullseye.com > Hot Reads ...In the Bullseye > The Texans
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-09-2011, 04:59 PM
TheMatrix31 TheMatrix31 is offline
Pro Bowler
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,042
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by chuck View Post
I'm still trying to understand why that call was to Vickers rather than Casey. Casey might have been hurt.

I don't know why Kubiak wasted a valuable timeout challenging a call that he clearly had no chance of overturning. It is absolutely inexcusable for Kubiak to continue to make these kinds of mistakes.

Why didn't have a quick-hit play called at the end to allow them another chance if the first call didn't work?

The Texans managed to look as bad as the stupidest, most undisciplined team in the history of football. Worse, actually.
Casey was hurt. Him and Mario are expected to be evaluated again tonight.

That play that was challenged was a potential first down play. If not, we punt. The challenge HAD to be made. And it was a catch. You know it and I know it. Just inconclusive.

Kubiak had a lot of problems today, and the playcalling was pretty weak. Tough to have a good playbook without the best wide receiver in football and your two backup RBs out, but still.

This loss falls on Schaub, offensive line, and Jacoby Jones. Plain and simple.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-09-2011, 05:13 PM
barrett barrett is offline
All-Pro
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 2,902
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheMatrix31 View Post
Casey was hurt. Him and Mario are expected to be evaluated again tonight.

That play that was challenged was a potential first down play. If not, we punt. The challenge HAD to be made. And it was a catch. You know it and I know it. Just inconclusive.

Kubiak had a lot of problems today, and the playcalling was pretty weak. Tough to have a good playbook without the best wide receiver in football and your two backup RBs out, but still.

This loss falls on Schaub, offensive line, and Jacoby Jones. Plain and simple.
So with Casey hurt that means schaub played the last two drives with no running plays and Walter, jones, dreesen, Daniels and foster. Street FAs at 3 and 4 WR. Practice squad backup rb. Backup fb. And an OL getting owned.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-09-2011, 05:19 PM
chuck chuck is offline
All-Pro
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,845
Default

What the hell is the deal with Bryant Johnson? Is he hurt? Inactive?
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-09-2011, 05:21 PM
barrett barrett is offline
All-Pro
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 2,902
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by chuck View Post
What the hell is the deal with Bryant Johnson? Is he hurt? Inactive?
Heard he was hurt but active and available in an emergency.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-09-2011, 05:25 PM
chuck chuck is offline
All-Pro
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,845
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by barrett View Post
Heard he was hurt but active and available in an emergency.
Do you remember what sort of injury it is? I did a quick search and couldn't find anything.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 10-09-2011, 05:27 PM
barrett barrett is offline
All-Pro
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 2,902
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by chuck View Post
Do you remember what sort of injury it is? I did a quick search and couldn't find anything.
Not sure. Just heard it from McClain on the 610 postgame.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 10-09-2011, 05:33 PM
chuck chuck is offline
All-Pro
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,845
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by barrett View Post
Not sure. Just heard it from McClain on the 610 postgame.
I heard that too but whenever I hear that guy speaking I quit paying close attention and wasn't sure whether he was talking about Johnson or Kareem Jackson.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 10-09-2011, 05:16 PM
barrett barrett is offline
All-Pro
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 2,902
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by chuck View Post
I would like to congratulate you for submitting what is likely the most idiotic thing I have ever read regarding the Texans. Please consider that I do not visit the official team site so I am not suggesting that this is the most idiotic thing ever said about the Texans; it is simply the most idiotic thing I personally have ever read.

It was clearly not a catch, and it was even clearer that there was not nearly enough to overturn it.

Kubiak has time and time again proven that he has no idea when and how to use the challenge. Neither do you. And once again, I don't care that you are clueless but I do care quite a bit that the head coach is clueless.
Well said. Not sure if it was a catch, but a stupid challenge.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:43 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.