IntheBullseye.com  

Go Back   IntheBullseye.com > Hot Reads ...In the Bullseye > The Texans
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-18-2008, 10:28 AM
Keith Keith is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,761
Default

I'm going to be putting up a new article on the site's front page later today that gets after Reeves and the team's continued suckage at signing UFAs from other teams.

It's not that I think Reeves is bad, he is just grossly overpaid... not unlike most of the team's other big money UFAs. It's tough saying this just two preseason games into his career as a member of the Texans (it is WAY too early to make much of anything we've seen in the preseason, good or bad), but I'll be surprised if Reeves is still on the roster Week 1 of next season.
__________________
Support ...IntheBullseye.com and follow us on Twitter
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-18-2008, 10:59 AM
Nconroe Nconroe is offline
All-Pro
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Lake Conroe
Posts: 2,897
Default

Okay, I'll try to be optimistic for time being on our CB's, they all got beat by Drew Brees on passes. I thought Reeves was keeping close to his man, not really beaten. He didn't get up his hands at the right time and for a deep pass , where was the deep Safety help? And, maybe he's gotta practice his tackling some more. Still second practice game only.

And UFA's, being optimistic, up to this year, I thought strategy was build depth for all positions due to we were a little short on cap space compared to some teams. Perhaps next year we can go after a sure fire UFA difference maker or two. is there a sure fire player with unexpected inuries, so on. lots of teams spend big on UFA's with poor results.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-18-2008, 11:22 AM
Keith Keith is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,761
Default

It is a good point about Brees and the Saints passing game as a whole... they are pretty darn good in that department, so over-reaction two weeks into preseason is a definite possibility here, I'll admit to that.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nconroe View Post
lots of teams spend big on UFA's with poor results.
Exactly. So why keep trying?

I'd much prefer the Texans re-sign what they have and just keep building through the draft. They'll need plenty of reserves to retain guys like Dunta, Owen, and Winston. It helps to get a little lucky on cheap UFAs like Andre Davis and Will Demps, too, but the big spending rarely pays off, so I'm still preaching abstinence here.
__________________
Support ...IntheBullseye.com and follow us on Twitter
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-18-2008, 12:04 PM
KJ3 KJ3 is offline
Regular Starter
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: h-town baby!
Posts: 563
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Keith View Post
It is a good point about Brees and the Saints passing game as a whole... they are pretty darn good in that department, so over-reaction two weeks into preseason is a definite possibility here, I'll admit to that
.
i've called it, am calling it, will continue to call it overplanning by smithiak. they knew a CB was coming in the draft. with dunta returning mid-season, bennett looking like a player really the slot they were looking to upgrade was the 3rd/4th man down. petey mcfaggins....admittedly i wanted a change too but this isn't exactly what i was hoping for. hell, if reeves turns into an all-pro CB this deal is still built on a questionable base. it's too much for a guy you expect to be depth who has a forest fire of a reputation. petey and jamar fletcher don't need competition.
__________________
Cowher Power 2011!!!!!!!!!!!!
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-18-2008, 12:41 PM
coloradodude coloradodude is offline
Regular Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 255
Default

I haven't read all the other posts so I posting fresh. I just saw the first half...

Jaquez Reeves sucks.

First, he got man handled by Reggie Bush not by getting stiff armed during the "tackle" but by getting punched in the face twice by Bush as Reeves guided Bush out of bounds. Reeves ended up on the ground while Bush then talked smack to him.

Next play? Reeves tackles the TE, who knocks Reeves' helmet off.

Two plays later...Bush hurdles Reeves into the endzone. Then Bush begins to taunt Reeves.

Reeves will be the David Carr of cornerbacks this year for the Texans.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 08-18-2008, 12:50 PM
barrett barrett is offline
All-Pro
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 2,902
Default

reeves is just an overreaction to the Robinson injury. Like it has been said I bet he is gone before next year. And with the cap sky rocketing every year and possible labor changes on the horizon, he probably won't hurt us much to cut.

Basically he was a very expensive, and apparently ineffective insurance policy. Get well Dunta.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 08-18-2008, 01:01 PM
kravix kravix is offline
Regular Starter
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 285
Default

Here is my take on the RB stiff arm. Reeves got beat down by him, but I think that he made the smart play. He maintained inside control and forced the play to stretch out of bounds rather than trying to tackle on his bad angle. He may have gotten beat down at the end, but he also might have kept they play from being twice as long considering there wasnt much support very close until Demeco showed up at the end.

The hurdle TD was just bad tackling, especially by a vet that should know better.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 08-18-2008, 02:13 PM
Joshua Joshua is offline
Regular Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 549
Default

While I'm not crazy about what I've seen from Reeves so far (and what I heard about him in Dallas), I don't think there is much dispute that the Texans had to bring in some veteran to play CB. Dunta was (and somewhat still is) a complete unknown. What we've seen from Bennett is encouraging but by no means a sure thing yet. Although we all expected the Texans to draft a corner, it was unknown who would be available (and it appears as though the Texans were targeting left tackle in the first round) so you couldn't count on this. Thus, they clearly needed depth at that position and were going to sign a free agent. If we're going to debate this signing, I think it should be done in the context of who was actually available.

Here is a list of this year's CB free agents - http://www.walterfootball.com/free2008CB.php

Based upon what it would cost to sign them, who would you rather have?
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 08-18-2008, 02:17 PM
Mike Mike is offline
Regular Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 512
Default

I have no problem with the play of Reeves on the Bush stiff arm play. He stopped him from turning the corner and forced him out. The long pass he needs to get his head turned around. He is not afraid to stick his nose in to tackle in the run game.
__________________
Even though I walk through the valley of the shadow of death, I fear no evil, for You are with me; Your rod and Your staff, they comfort me. PS 23:4
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 08-18-2008, 06:32 PM
Keith Keith is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,761
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Keith View Post
I'm going to be putting up a new article on the site's front page later today that gets after Reeves and the team's continued suckage at signing UFAs from other teams.
It's not up on the front page (yet, it will be by tomorrow) since news about Weary and speculation on Green's future and the cap implications are taking precedent, but far be it for me to be a tease on this and not deliver.

http://www.inthebullseye.com/archive/2008/20080819.html
__________________
Support ...IntheBullseye.com and follow us on Twitter
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 08-18-2008, 11:25 PM
shawn76ers shawn76ers is offline
On the Sidelines
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 2
Default

i remember andre dyson coming in here for a visit before signing with the jets....We should have signed him instead of reeeves....i hope this decision does not haunt us for the next few yrs.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 08-19-2008, 06:42 AM
RunninRaven RunninRaven is offline
Drafted Rookie
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 58
Default

Nice read, Keith. That's interesting about Grier, although there has been a noticeable improvement in draft returns since Richard Smith took over, so I'm not ready to believe that much of the Texans futility the first 5 years or so were on his shoulders.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 08-19-2008, 08:12 AM
Keith Keith is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,761
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RunninRaven View Post
Nice read, Keith. That's interesting about Grier, although there has been a noticeable improvement in draft returns since Richard Smith took over, so I'm not ready to believe that much of the Texans futility the first 5 years or so were on his shoulders.
Grier is responsible for pro scouting, not college scouting, so draft returns aren't directly part of the equation...but I see your point. Also, the success of the draft has made some pro player decisions look worse (like Mario vs. Weaver, for example).

We focus so much on college scouting, I just think our pro player scouting has been below average aside from a few "street" FAs like Andre Davis, Will Demps, and Anthony Maddox.
__________________
Support ...IntheBullseye.com and follow us on Twitter
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 08-19-2008, 09:35 AM
RunninRaven RunninRaven is offline
Drafted Rookie
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 58
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Keith View Post
Grier is responsible for pro scouting, not college scouting, so draft returns aren't directly part of the equation...but I see your point. Also, the success of the draft has made some pro player decisions look worse (like Mario vs. Weaver, for example).

We focus so much on college scouting, I just think our pro player scouting has been below average aside from a few "street" FAs like Andre Davis, Will Demps, and Anthony Maddox.
Yes, the pro player free agents have been pretty abysmal, especially the big money ones. I can't think of any big money free agents this team has acquired that worked out, even a little. Weaver hasn't been much help, Todd Wade was terrible, Robaire Smith didn't do much that I remember, Green is perpetually injured (had he stayed healthy, this might have really helped the team's record). I just hope Reeves doesn't fall in this category as well.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 08-22-2008, 12:20 PM
jppaul jppaul is offline
Regular Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 343
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RunninRaven View Post
Nice read, Keith. That's interesting about Grier, although there has been a noticeable improvement in draft returns since Richard Smith took over, so I'm not ready to believe that much of the Texans futility the first 5 years or so were on his shoulders.
Imo, I am not really worried about his getting burned by the hurdle touchdown and the stiff arm.


As someone said earlier he played the stiff arm correctly and as far as get hurdled there really wasn't an alternative there. He went low to maintain jis leverage and keep bush out of the endzone. If he went high bushs forward momentum would have just carried them both into the endzone.

I am more worried about his coverage skills than anything else.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 08-22-2008, 01:41 PM
NBT NBT is offline
Pro Bowler
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: S.E. Texas Coast
Posts: 1,836
Default

If Grier is the weak point, then he needs to go, simple as that. And he seems to be.
__________________
NBT - Elder statesman. Wisdom comes with age - Now if i could remember what it was!
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 09-01-2008, 05:37 PM
NBT NBT is offline
Pro Bowler
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: S.E. Texas Coast
Posts: 1,836
Default

Now that the cutdowns to 53 has come and gone, CB Deltha O'neal was cut, but he was picked up quickly by the Pattycakes. We still are battling that old reputation of underachievers, I reckon.
__________________
NBT - Elder statesman. Wisdom comes with age - Now if i could remember what it was!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:12 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.