IntheBullseye.com  

Go Back   IntheBullseye.com > Hot Reads ...In the Bullseye > The NFL Draft
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-17-2010, 10:16 PM
kRocket kRocket is offline
Veteran Depth
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 176
Default

To my great sadness you guys are talking like the ZBS is a foregone conclusion. Depending on Pitts' comeback 2 to 3 fifths of our OL may be new next year. Are you sure you want to pick a back based on a somewhat teetering conclusion as to what kind of back we need.


IIRC Foster ran very well during the pre-season but was put on the PS because of his blocking inadequacies. I don't think it had anything to do with whether he could run or not.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-17-2010, 10:44 PM
HPF Bob HPF Bob is offline
All-Pro
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 4,149
Default

If so, Foster learned really well. His blitz pickup was one of the things I thought he did exceptionally well in his brief appearance.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-17-2010, 10:46 PM
edo783 edo783 is offline
Regular Starter
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Tomball
Posts: 313
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by HPF Bob View Post
If so, Foster learned really well. His blitz pickup was one of the things I thought he did exceptionally well in his brief appearance.
It was one of the reasons they PSed him and you are correct, when he got his chance, he showed he had learned to pickup the blitz.
__________________
Old age just comes at a real bad time.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01-17-2010, 10:51 PM
Roy P Roy P is offline
All-Pro
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,761
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kRocket View Post
To my great sadness you guys are talking like the ZBS is a foregone conclusion. Depending on Pitts' comeback 2 to 3 fifths of our OL may be new next year. Are you sure you want to pick a back based on a somewhat teetering conclusion as to what kind of back we need.
Dennison doesn't run a ZBS? This could be good news.
__________________
Originally Posted by chuck
I'm just sitting here thinking (pacing, actually) that whatever my issues with Kubiak he is apparently a goddam genius at tutoring quarterbacks.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 01-19-2010, 01:58 PM
nero THE zero nero THE zero is offline
Regular Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Spring
Posts: 366
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Roy P View Post
Dennison doesn't run a ZBS? This could be good news.
Yes, he does. He replaced Gibbs as Denver's OL coach and replaced Kubiak as Denver's OC.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 01-19-2010, 04:52 PM
Roy P Roy P is offline
All-Pro
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,761
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Roy P View Post
Dennison doesn't run a ZBS? This could be good news.
Sorry, I didn't have a sarcastic face to go along with my statement.

While I am not 100% happy with the ZBS when it comes to short yardage situations, I don't think the departure of Alex Gibbs means we don't have to find a "Prototypical" ZBS Running Back. If we could clone Terrell Davis, that would be good.
__________________
Originally Posted by chuck
I'm just sitting here thinking (pacing, actually) that whatever my issues with Kubiak he is apparently a goddam genius at tutoring quarterbacks.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 01-20-2010, 08:29 AM
nero THE zero nero THE zero is offline
Regular Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Spring
Posts: 366
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Roy P View Post
Sorry, I didn't have a sarcastic face to go along with my statement.

While I am not 100% happy with the ZBS when it comes to short yardage situations, I don't think the departure of Alex Gibbs means we don't have to find a "Prototypical" ZBS Running Back. If we could clone Terrell Davis, that would be good.
I've seen someone throw out the idea that bringing in a younger guy to coach the ZBS might be beneficial. The suggestion is that Gibbs is so set in his ways that he doesn't allow the scheme to adjust to new trends in the NFL; that a younger guy can bring a nuanced version more adept to the modern NFL.

It's a glass-half-full idea, but I'm buying into it.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 01-20-2010, 04:57 PM
kRocket kRocket is offline
Veteran Depth
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 176
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Roy P View Post
Sorry, I didn't have a sarcastic face to go along with my statement.

While I am not 100% happy with the ZBS when it comes to short yardage situations, I don't think the departure of Alex Gibbs means we don't have to find a "Prototypical" ZBS Running Back. If we could clone Terrell Davis, that would be good.
Gosh. You got my hopes up for a few moments
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 01-20-2010, 11:03 PM
Roy P Roy P is offline
All-Pro
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,761
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kRocket View Post
Gosh. You got my hopes up for a few moments
You'll have to wait for Kubiak to get fired before we throw out the ZBS.
__________________
Originally Posted by chuck
I'm just sitting here thinking (pacing, actually) that whatever my issues with Kubiak he is apparently a goddam genius at tutoring quarterbacks.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 01-21-2010, 12:42 AM
painekiller painekiller is offline
All-Pro
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Near the Galleria
Posts: 2,852
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Roy P View Post
You'll have to wait for Kubiak to get fired before we throw out the ZBS.
We will always run some form of ZBS, just not the pure form as taught by Alex Gibbs.
__________________
There is no failure, only feedback.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 01-21-2010, 08:32 AM
nero THE zero nero THE zero is offline
Regular Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Spring
Posts: 366
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Roy P View Post
You'll have to wait for Kubiak to get fired before we throw out the ZBS.
Or maybe not, depending on who replaces him.

This anti-ZBS bias is totally irrational.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:38 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.