IntheBullseye.com  

Go Back   IntheBullseye.com > Hot Reads ...In the Bullseye > The Texans
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-04-2010, 10:23 AM
Keith Keith is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,761
Default Baby Shan Leaving Texans / Search for a New OC

Quote:
“We weren’t going to be denied,” Kubiak said. “When we were down (27-13), I told Kyle I wanted to go up-tempo. I thought we needed three possessions to win, so we went with our three-wide package.”

Shanahan, who’s expected to follow his father, Mike Shanahan, to the Washington Redskins, called the plays that produced three consecutive touchdowns.
http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/...t/6796848.html

This maybe isn't new speculation given Mike Shanahan has been in the news for awhile now on his hunt for a new job, but I thought this deserved a thread here to watch how this develops.

Kyle Shanahan gets a lot of grief from fans (not quite all of it deserved imo), but how Kubiak fills the OC role should Kyle leaves will be interesting. Will Kubiak resume playcalling duties? Or will he turn it over to someone else, and if so, how will that impact what has become one of the best offenses in the league?
__________________
Support ...IntheBullseye.com and follow us on Twitter
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-04-2010, 10:29 AM
WMH WMH is offline
Pro Bowler
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,795
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Keith View Post
http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/...t/6796848.html

This maybe isn't new speculation given Mike Shanahan has been in the news for awhile now on his hunt for a new job, but I thought this deserved a thread here to watch how this develops.

Kyle Shanahan gets a lot of grief from fans (not quite all of it deserved imo), but how Kubiak fills the OC role should Kyle leaves will be interesting. Will Kubiak resume playcalling duties? Or will he turn it over to someone else, and if so, how will that impact what has become one of the best offenses in the league?
Yeah, the writing is on the wall for Baby Shan to depart. This will be his last shot to work with his pops, and I just don't see him passing that up. I think he has been pretty vocal about wanting that opportunity. I say good for him. We will be fine. Baby Shan learned under Kubiak, and Kubiak maintained control throughout this year and last. I would imagine that it will be the same next year as well. Kubes will probably handle more than he needs to in the beginning, then hand it off after trust is earned.

Remember, last year vs the Bears, noone knew until the post game presser that Baby Shan even ran the offense......
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-04-2010, 10:41 AM
Mike Mike is offline
Regular Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 512
Default

This is a non-story. Kubes has said before that he expected at some point that Kyle would join Mike. I do think having playcalling duties removed from his plate has helped Kubes this year.

He will find an OC familiar with the system and be able to get him up to speed all throughout OTA's, mini-camp and training camp.

Will be interesting to see if Alex Gibbs comes back for another year.
__________________
Even though I walk through the valley of the shadow of death, I fear no evil, for You are with me; Your rod and Your staff, they comfort me. PS 23:4
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01-04-2010, 10:43 AM
Keith Keith is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,761
Default

per Charley Casserly of all people...

http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/sp...-80537292.html

With the Redskins on the schedule in 2010, that could make for an intriguing (and possibly primetime?) matchup.
__________________
Support ...IntheBullseye.com and follow us on Twitter
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 01-04-2010, 10:59 AM
cland cland is offline
Veteran Depth
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 132
Default

I guess that team will be called the 'Texans East'? Hopefully they don't romance some our our mid line depth.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 01-04-2010, 11:19 AM
Nconroe Nconroe is offline
All-Pro
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Lake Conroe
Posts: 2,897
Default

Looks like Black Monday will be making plenty of coaches with experience available such as from Washington and Buffalo so far.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 01-04-2010, 12:03 PM
James James is offline
Undrafted Rookie
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Houston
Posts: 43
Default

I can't say that coaching with his dad is going to be as much of a resume builder with Redskins as staying here and leading the Texans to the playoffs with one of the premier aerial attacks in the league. Just look at what Josh McDaniels was offered in such a hurry. I really think a hard sale from McNair and Kubiak would help him to realize that and stick for at least another year or two until he is offered a head job somewhere, rather than regress in Washington.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 01-04-2010, 12:25 PM
chuck chuck is offline
All-Pro
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,845
Default

If the Texans end up with an OC who can shift the red zone play calling from stupefyingly idiotic to cheerfully boneheaded that should be good for another four wins or so.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 01-04-2010, 01:42 PM
TheMatrix31 TheMatrix31 is offline
Pro Bowler
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,042
Default

I wonder who the candidates are to fill Shanahan's spot.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 01-04-2010, 01:58 PM
texan texan is offline
Undrafted Rookie
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 27
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheMatrix31 View Post
I wonder who the candidates are to fill Shanahan's spot.
My money's on Rick Dennison.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 01-04-2010, 01:59 PM
Arky Arky is offline
Hall of Fame
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 9,291
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheMatrix31 View Post
I wonder who the candidates are to fill Shanahan's spot.
Aren't Kubiak's sons recently graduated? j/k
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 01-04-2010, 02:35 PM
Keith Keith is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,761
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by James View Post
I can't say that coaching with his dad is going to be as much of a resume builder with Redskins as staying here and leading the Texans to the playoffs with one of the premier aerial attacks in the league.
This was the first thing that crossed my mind a few weeks or so ago when rumors of his father's return began. And unsaid here is that the Texans would have to grant permission to the Redskins for an interview since this would be a lateral move, right?

There would presumably be better job security by moving to the Redskins, given his father would just be entering a multi-year contract whereas Kubiak will be entering the last year of his in Houston (barring an extension, of course). Job security does not equal job sanity though.
__________________
Support ...IntheBullseye.com and follow us on Twitter
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 01-04-2010, 03:38 PM
chuck chuck is offline
All-Pro
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,845
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Keith View Post
There would presumably be better job security by moving to the Redskins, given his father would just be entering a multi-year contract whereas Kubiak will be entering the last year of his in Houston (barring an extension, of course). Job security does not equal job sanity though.
You know who owns the Redskins, right?
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 01-04-2010, 05:07 PM
Keith Keith is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,761
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by chuck View Post
You know who owns the Redskins, right?
Of course. But as it stands now, Kubiak has just one year left. Snyder may decide to axe Shanahan after one year, but I doubt it given the amount he'll be investing in his next head coach. And one would think that Mike wouldn't fire his son after one season, right?

But that's why I also referenced job sanity... working long days and nights with your father (seems over-romanticized to me once the "teehee, this is fun!" wears off) not to mention working for a crazy boss like Snyder might be detrimental to one's mental well-being.
__________________
Support ...IntheBullseye.com and follow us on Twitter
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 01-04-2010, 09:25 PM
Keith Keith is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,761
Default

chron.com has the short list of candidates to replace baby Shan:

Quote:
The four candidates to replace Texans offensive coordinator Kyle Shanahan are Tennessee offensive line coach Mike Munchak, Denver offensive line coach Rick Dennison, Atlanta quarterbacks coach Bill Musgrave and Kansas City offensive coordinator Chan Gailey. ...

Kubiak worked with Dennison, Musgrave and Gailey in Denver. He's never worked with Munchak, who has spent his entire 28-year playing and coaching career the Oilers/Titans.

Munchak has never been an offensive coordinator. He's coached the offensive line since he retired after the 1993 season.

Musgrave, a former NFL quarterback, coached Matt Schaub at the University of Virginia and with the Falcons.
Kubiak tried to bring Dennison with him from the Broncos in 2006, but Mike Shanahan wouldn't let him out of his contract.
http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/...t/6798435.html
__________________
Support ...IntheBullseye.com and follow us on Twitter
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 01-04-2010, 09:47 PM
Roy P Roy P is offline
All-Pro
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,761
Default

Atlanta quarterbacks coach Bill Musgrave

Musgrave, a former NFL quarterback, coached Matt Schaub at the University of Virginia and with the Falcons.


--Put me down for this guy. The offense was able to produce some yardage, so I would like some "continuity" and familiarity. I realize there were times when the offense could not score in the red zone or convert short yardage situations, but I blame most of that on the interior OL and the RB.
__________________
Originally Posted by chuck
I'm just sitting here thinking (pacing, actually) that whatever my issues with Kubiak he is apparently a goddam genius at tutoring quarterbacks.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 01-04-2010, 09:55 PM
bckey bckey is offline
Drafted Rookie
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 97
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Roy P View Post
Atlanta quarterbacks coach Bill Musgrave

Musgrave, a former NFL quarterback, coached Matt Schaub at the University of Virginia and with the Falcons.


--Put me down for this guy. The offense was able to produce some yardage, so I would like some "continuity" and familiarity. I realize there were times when the offense could not score in the red zone or convert short yardage situations, but I blame most of that on the interior OL and the RB.

I'm with Roy on this one.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 01-05-2010, 09:28 AM
Mike Mike is offline
Regular Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 512
Default

I like Musgrave as well. Although Chan Gailey was a very good OC, just a terrible HC. He is like the offensive version of Capers.
__________________
Even though I walk through the valley of the shadow of death, I fear no evil, for You are with me; Your rod and Your staff, they comfort me. PS 23:4
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 01-05-2010, 09:39 AM
popanot popanot is offline
Pro Bowler
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,916
Default

All of those candidates have qualities I like and all would probably be fine in this system, although, Munchak is the least known commodity from an OC standpoint and probably the highest risk. It would be pretty cool having him and Bruce Matthews on staff, but I don't see him getting the job.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 01-05-2010, 04:45 PM
NBT NBT is offline
Pro Bowler
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: S.E. Texas Coast
Posts: 1,836
Default

I don't know, I kind of like Mike Munchak for the OC job. He would certainly improve the run blocking and working with Kubiak, it shouldn't hurt the passing game too much. Besides it would piss off Bud Adams to lose him to the Texans. I like that thought. After thought: it would also reunite Munchak and Mathews, the best two Olinemen the old Oilers ever had.
__________________
NBT - Elder statesman. Wisdom comes with age - Now if i could remember what it was!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:59 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.