IntheBullseye.com  

Go Back   IntheBullseye.com > Hot Reads ...In the Bullseye > The NFL Draft
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-09-2009, 10:52 AM
Keith Keith is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,761
Default Forbes: Texans Best at Drafting Over Last Three Years

Quote:
To judge them, we looked at the percentage of players from those three draft classes who were still listed as active members of the team. The results were surprising.

Topping the list of the best drafting teams: the Houston Texans, who have kept on their current roster an amazing 85% of the players they've drafted in the last three years. The Texans have also produced two All-Pros (linebacker DeMeco Ryans and defensive end Mario Williams). But the Texans' record over the last three years is a less-than-mediocre 22-26. ...
http://www.forbes.com/2009/04/08/nfl...nfl-draft.html
__________________
Support ...IntheBullseye.com and follow us on Twitter
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-09-2009, 11:04 AM
papabear papabear is offline
Regular Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Houston
Posts: 838
Default

I think we drafted pretty well in recent history, but this is probably more of a function of how bad the team was than anything else. We've had some great draft picks along the way, but things were a mess when Kubiak got here.
__________________
"Well, at least our players kept their helmets on, so that showed some intelligence"-BobMcNair
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-09-2009, 06:32 PM
HPF Bob HPF Bob is offline
All-Pro
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 4,149
Default

Props have to go to Charley Casserly and Dom Capers for this. I'm sure part of the reason we played 85% of our draft picks was because the cupboard was so bare after the 2-14 season plus our defense was full of 3-4 players while we converted to the 4-3 under the new regime.

IOW, while Smith/Kubiak deserve props for getting players who fit their system, the reason we are #1 as opposed to, say, the Patriots or the Colts is because we had so many jobs available while other teams didn't.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 04-09-2009, 07:11 PM
kRocket kRocket is offline
Veteran Depth
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 176
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by HPF Bob View Post
.... I'm sure part of the reason we played 85% of our draft picks was because the cupboard was so bare after the 2-14 season ....
This was my first thought also! It showed our overall lack of talent.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 04-10-2009, 12:01 AM
gunn gunn is offline
Veteran Depth
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 149
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kRocket View Post
This was my first thought also! It showed our overall lack of talent.

Well... maybe partially. But you still have draft the players. You could be the 49ers, Lions, or Raiders. I would think alot of their players could be replaced.... No?
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:58 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.