IntheBullseye.com  

Go Back   IntheBullseye.com > Hot Reads ...In the Bullseye > The NFL Draft
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-12-2009, 08:50 PM
Roy P Roy P is offline
All-Pro
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,761
Default Duane Brown's replacement?

I know we spent a 1st round pick, but did Duane Brown calm us? Want to guess how many sacks he was credited for giving up? He tied for last in the NFL with 11.5, oh yeah, he had Ephraim Salaam spelling him every other series so he wouldn't get tired and run down.

Am I suggesting that we trade up for Mike Oher? No, while I would love to see him at #15. Can the Texans "save face" and not spend their 1st round pick on an OT, but still get somebody to compete? I'm speculating, yes they could.

Both Troy Kopog - Tulane and William Beatty - Connecticut have some experience of blocking for a successful running game (Mike Forte and Donald Brown, respectively). They also have the agility to play in the ZBS of Gibbs.

One other option is the possibility of Jason Smith - Baylor at #15. I'm not saying that would necessarily be the smartest move, but depending upon who is available, could be the Texans' move.

Just thought I'd start a little conversation that I haven't seen here recently.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-12-2009, 09:00 PM
barrett barrett is offline
All-Pro
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 2,902
Default

I agree that Brown is not there yet, but my concern is what to do with him if we make this pick. Many LTs fail because they are not athletic enough so you move them over and they are good RTs. But with Brown, he is not that physical or strong and I'm not sure he is a RT. Nor am I sure a guy lacking a physical nature fits on the interior. Not to mention position switches never help with development.

Honestly Brown seems like a guy with one position so I guess we hope the flashes he showed are signs of good things to come.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-12-2009, 10:01 PM
Bigtinylittle Bigtinylittle is offline
Regular Starter
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 262
Default

Since the question is what the Texans WILL do and not what they SHOULD do, here is my answer: The Texans, in my opinion, think Brown had an excellent rookie season as a run blocker and greatly improved in the second half as a pass blocker. I think they are counting on his pass blocking improving even more next year. I think they still believe they were correct in their pre-draft evaluation of his ability and think he just needs more work, more polish. Remember, if they don't have a winning season next year, Kubiak knows he is probably history, so he will likely use his first pick for an IMMEDIATE upgrade. If we pick a LT at 15, there is no guarantee that whoever we might pick at LT wouldn't go through the same rookie problems that most rookie LTs go through.

Also if we go LT, that means no first rounder to throw at DT, Running Back, or Safety, positions where one could say the need will be greater next year and also whoever we draft would arguably require less break-in time than LT does. There are at least half a dozen positions I could easily see us drafting, but LT just isn't one of them.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01-13-2009, 12:34 AM
mussop mussop is offline
Regular Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: livingston
Posts: 360
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Roy P View Post
I know we spent a 1st round pick, but did Duane Brown calm us? Want to guess how many sacks he was credited for giving up? He tied for last in the NFL with 11.5, oh yeah, he had Ephraim Salaam spelling him every other series so he wouldn't get tired and run down.

Am I suggesting that we trade up for Mike Oher? No, while I would love to see him at #15. Can the Texans "save face" and not spend their 1st round pick on an OT, but still get somebody to compete? I'm speculating, yes they could.

Both Troy Kopog - Tulane and William Beatty - Connecticut have some experience of blocking for a successful running game (Mike Forte and Donald Brown, respectively). They also have the agility to play in the ZBS of Gibbs.

One other option is the possibility of Jason Smith - Baylor at #15. I'm not saying that would necessarily be the smartest move, but depending upon who is available, could be the Texans' move.

Just thought I'd start a little conversation that I haven't seen here recently.
When talk of Oher (falling) started I said then that if He or Monroe were to somehow fall we would be crazy to pass them up. You never pass up a franchise LT. Factor in that Brown was a big dissapointment (IMO) and there is no way we pass on either of them.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 01-13-2009, 10:19 AM
painekiller painekiller is offline
All-Pro
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Near the Galleria
Posts: 2,852
Default

You cannot cheer Gibbs and his work here and at the same time bitch about Myers and Brown, they are what a Gibbs OL looks like.

But draft Oher/Monroe in the 1st and Jonathan Luigs/Eric Wood in the 3rd and you have an OL that can compete with any OL in the league.

Oher, Pitts, Luigs, Winston, Brown

That would be some beef that can run.
__________________
There is no failure, only feedback.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 01-13-2009, 11:57 AM
idymoe idymoe is offline
Veteran Depth
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Boise, ID
Posts: 158
Default

Most of Brown's sacks allowed were in the first few games going against some of the top rushers in the league. Kubiak has said several times that he is very pleased with Brown's progress. BTW, Salaam didn't alternate every other series with Brown. He came in every third series and less so in the last few games. People remember sacks, and it's easy to look back on a sack he gave up on a bullrush and conclude he is not strong. I think he is adequately strong, adequately physical, very athletic and has a very desirable disposition.
I would expect him to be stronger next season, after an off-season weight program. I would expect his technique and footwork to improve after going through a rookie season.

Having said all that, painkiller's line would be awesome.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 01-13-2009, 02:59 PM
papabear papabear is offline
Regular Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Houston
Posts: 838
Default

I think Brown showed obvious improvement as the season went along. There's no reason to suspect that won't continue with a full off season to work on technique and strength. I doubt we go LT early. I won't complain if we do because a dominant line on either side of the ball makes all the other positions look better.

One thing to remember is that just because a guy is big doesn't mean he can't play in this scheme. Sure, the average lineman in a ZBS tends to be a little lighter than average, but that doesn't mean a mammoth OL can't do it. Most people questioned the Spencer pick because he didn't fit the norm for a ZBS. He had the feet for it though, and had he not been injured it looked like the sky was the limit.
__________________
"Well, at least our players kept their helmets on, so that showed some intelligence"-BobMcNair
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 01-13-2009, 03:48 PM
NickO NickO is offline
Drafted Rookie
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Perth, Western Australia
Posts: 57
Default

Brown's 11.5 sacks given up would concern me more if he wasn't part of the league's 4th best passing offense.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 01-13-2009, 05:25 PM
NBT NBT is offline
Pro Bowler
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: S.E. Texas Coast
Posts: 1,836
Default

I would be very surprised (and dissappointed), if this Draft isn't heavy on the defensive side of the ball. I also think it is premature to dismiss out of hand, a young OT like Brown, who has just now finished his first year at the position.
__________________
NBT - Elder statesman. Wisdom comes with age - Now if i could remember what it was!
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 01-13-2009, 07:35 PM
mussop mussop is offline
Regular Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: livingston
Posts: 360
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by idymoe View Post
Most of Brown's sacks allowed were in the first few games going against some of the top rushers in the league.

Having said all that, painkiller's line would be awesome.
I keep hearing this but havent seen any stats to back it up. Does anyone have the sacks allowed by game?

If we are going to use this draft to finish the line then I would go

Oher, Pitts, Mack, Winston, Brown
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 01-13-2009, 09:00 PM
painekiller painekiller is offline
All-Pro
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Near the Galleria
Posts: 2,852
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mussop View Post
I keep hearing this but havent seen any stats to back it up. Does anyone have the sacks allowed by game?

If we are going to use this draft to finish the line then I would go

Oher, Pitts, Mack, Winston, Brown
Most list point to Mack being a late 1st to early 2nd round guy, so you want to trade up/back in to grab Mack?
__________________
There is no failure, only feedback.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 01-13-2009, 10:13 PM
mussop mussop is offline
Regular Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: livingston
Posts: 360
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by painekiller View Post
Most list point to Mack being a late 1st to early 2nd round guy, so you want to trade up/back in to grab Mack?
No trade up but if he isnt there i'd gladly take Unger.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 01-14-2009, 10:12 AM
papabear papabear is offline
Regular Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Houston
Posts: 838
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mussop View Post
I keep hearing this but havent seen any stats to back it up. Does anyone have the sacks allowed by game?

If we are going to use this draft to finish the line then I would go

Oher, Pitts, Mack, Winston, Brown

I can't find anywhere that breaks them down game by game. If you look at the schedule though we played Pitt, Tenn, and Indy in the first four weeks. Those are all teams that can get to the QB. I specifically remember Brown getting abused in the Pitt game. Harrison had three sacks in that game alone and I think there were like five total.

The next week Vanden Bosch and Kearse each had one.

Freeny had one in the first Indy game.

I don't know how many of these were credited to Brown, and that's the big problem with the sacks allowed stat. Only the team knows what the protection scheme was, so it might look like a T got beat badly, but the TE might have blow his assignement to help. That being said it's likely Brown could be credited with 5 sacks allowed in just these first three games.

I seem to remember him struggling the second time around against Freeney as well, but the eyeball test tells me that he improved in both pass protection and run blocking. One thing to remember is that Brown was a TE for his first couple years of college...and I think only had one year at LT before going to the NFL. It's hard to imagine him not getting better as he has more time at the position.
__________________
"Well, at least our players kept their helmets on, so that showed some intelligence"-BobMcNair
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 01-14-2009, 11:30 AM
idymoe idymoe is offline
Veteran Depth
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Boise, ID
Posts: 158
Default

In the 4th game against the Dolphins, Porter had a sack and quite a few hurries. You can go to the game books for each game at nfl.com to see who had the sacks, but it doesn't say who allowed. I do remember a couple of times in the last part of the season that McClain or LZ mentioned a large number of his sacks in the 1st several games. I wouldn't swear to it, but I think it was 5 1/2 sacks allowed in the 1st 4 games. That certainly seems reasonable.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 01-14-2009, 01:43 PM
Maninthebox Maninthebox is offline
On the Sidelines
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: The Woodlands
Posts: 7
Default

This topic is a waste of time. Let's move on.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 01-14-2009, 02:01 PM
idymoe idymoe is offline
Veteran Depth
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Boise, ID
Posts: 158
Default

Yes, let's quit wasting time and roll up our sleeves and really get something done in those other 3 active threads. We're burnin' daylight, boys.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 01-14-2009, 10:58 PM
kravix kravix is offline
Regular Starter
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 285
Default

Not to speak for maninthebox, but if his feeling on this subject is anything like mine...

I was shocked, and then not so much, when this thread poped up. Hanging a rookie LT out to dry in his first season. We arent drafting from other NFL rosters, we are drafting from college rosters.

I think I saw it earlier and I will reiterate it. Brown was a TE, moved to RT, and played his last season in college as a LT. So he has a whoping 3 years playing as a tackle, and he played against some of the best pass rushers in the league this year very early. I would say he was average. With that resume and his upside that would make him awesome.

The odds of even drafting a tackle in this draft, with intent to start rather than put on the PS, are probably slimmer than drafting a QB.

Also like someone else said, given the rank of our pass offense, the kid cant be all that bad.

Sometimes I wonder at the people who think that all 52 players on the roster should be pro bowlers. I think I need their jobs so I can eat filet and lobster prepared by a master chef every night too. I bet Bob McNair wishes the same thing.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 01-14-2009, 11:54 PM
Roy P Roy P is offline
All-Pro
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,761
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kravix View Post
Brown was a TE, moved to RT, and played his last season in college as a LT.

I would say he was average. With that resume and his upside that would make him awesome.


I think I need their jobs so I can eat filet and lobster prepared by a master chef every night too. I bet Bob McNair wishes the same thing.
Yup, he's the next Orlando Pace, we're set at LT.

Average = Awesome? That's realistic expectations. You are a glass half full kind of guy, right?

Bob McNair and I definitely need to switch places for a year.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 01-15-2009, 09:54 AM
kravix kravix is offline
Regular Starter
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 285
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Roy P View Post
Yup, he's the next Orlando Pace, we're set at LT.

Average = Awesome? That's realistic expectations. You are a glass half full kind of guy, right?

Bob McNair and I definitely need to switch places for a year.
What I meant was that a kid with very little experience in the position came into the NFL and started from the get go at a postion that is one of the hardest to fill. He showed improvement and played ok. To me that is awesome. IMO next year should be much better and even if he does only elevate his game to slightly above average that is way better than having a lesser LT.

I never said he played like a HOF LT, but I am excited about where he may be skill wise next year.

PS. My glass is always full.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 01-15-2009, 12:39 PM
Roy P Roy P is offline
All-Pro
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,761
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kravix View Post

PS. My glass is always full.
That's fine, just make sure to check what it's full of.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:30 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.