IntheBullseye.com  

Go Back   IntheBullseye.com > Hot Reads ...In the Bullseye > The NFL Draft
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-05-2009, 04:37 PM
Roy P Roy P is offline
All-Pro
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,761
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by painekiller View Post

I would rather take Alphonso Smith for his cover and ball skills then Jenkins.
I keep thinking about that little guy for my draft board. He's not as fast as he looks on the field, but he's a playmaker. As for shadowing those little jitterbugs, he's got those skills and would be a very good nickle CB covering the slot. My biggest problem is that for somebody that short, he's not a lightning fast guy and he's not going to remind anybody of Antoine Winfield with his tackling.
__________________
Originally Posted by chuck
I'm just sitting here thinking (pacing, actually) that whatever my issues with Kubiak he is apparently a goddam genius at tutoring quarterbacks.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-10-2009, 11:08 AM
Keith Keith is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,761
Default

DGDB&D has had some entertaining anti-Jenkins commentary and analysis on their site, most recently in this post.

Quote:
Teams went at Jenkins, with success, throughout his career. In the early days, this was because Ashton Youbouty was opposite him. In 2006-2008, however, teams still didn’t really shy away from him. ESPECIALLY not the teams OSU faced outside the Big 10. I’m going to come back to this specific point in a bit, but briefly consider: Jenkins had primary responsibility for Quan Cosby in this year’s Fiesta Bowl, and that ended with Cosby putting up 14 catches for 171 yards and 2 TDs while Jenkins… well… watched ...
__________________
Support ...IntheBullseye.com and follow us on Twitter
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-10-2009, 11:50 AM
HPF Bob HPF Bob is offline
All-Pro
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 4,149
Default

Actually, the Buckeyes had a young corner (name escapes me) that the Longhorns picked on in the Fiesta Bowl who was not Jenkins. The Longhorns looked at Shipley and Cosby and decided who they were going to based on how they were covered. Jenkins was matched against Shipley most of the day which was why Cosby had the big day and not Shipley. Tressel mixed coverages but I think McCoy was aware of where Jenkins was and picked on the young corner instead.

On the game-winning TD, the Longhorns went four wide and put Cosby in the slot. The Buckeyes tried to match him with a safety whom the Longhorn coaches knew was inclined to cheat up towards the line. So they watched the safety cheat up and realized they could beat him to the point of the throw. Boom-boom. Slip the tackle...touchdown. McCoy and Cosby saw the key and must have been licking their chops when they saw the safety move up. Both said they KNEW they had that play as soon as they saw the safety cheat up.

So, whether Jenkins is first-round quality can be debated but I don't think you can fault Jenkins for Cosby's performance or the Fiesta Bowl loss.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 04-10-2009, 03:56 PM
papabear papabear is offline
Regular Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Houston
Posts: 838
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by HPF Bob View Post
So, whether Jenkins is first-round quality can be debated but I don't think you can fault Jenkins for Cosby's performance or the Fiesta Bowl loss.
I really would have to go back and watch that game to remember how much Jenkins got thrown at, but Matt is a huge Michigan fan...so he watches way more Big 10 football than me, but he also despises Ohio State with every fiber in his body. So you have to take that analysis with a grain of salt.
__________________
"Well, at least our players kept their helmets on, so that showed some intelligence"-BobMcNair
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 04-12-2009, 08:54 AM
popanot popanot is offline
Pro Bowler
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,916
Default

There's no denying Jenkins is a first round talent. And on the surface, he's probably one of the the safest and most sensible pick for us. He can play two positions and with Dunta's future with the team in doubt, he'd provide some security while we found a replacement at CB. Whether we go that route or not, who knows? But I can see Jenkins being a high probablity if he's still there at #15.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 04-12-2009, 09:47 PM
Nconroe Nconroe is offline
All-Pro
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Lake Conroe
Posts: 2,897
Default

but seems like Jenkins draft rank is dropping to end of first round. lot of vlue difference between picks 15 and 30, even though both in first round. but who knows, could work out great in a couple years.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 04-13-2009, 06:59 AM
popanot popanot is offline
Pro Bowler
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,916
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nconroe View Post
lot of vlue difference between picks 15 and 30, even though both in first round.
A lot of factors go in to value. Depends who's there and how you have your board rankings, what your needs are, if your willing to deal and if there's another team willing to deal, etc., etc. I don't have a problem moving down if we can, but I'm of the opinion that if the guy you want is there, then take him and don't play around with the odds someone you like will there if you move down. Also, I'm not advocating we take Jenkins, but he does make sense and I could see them going that route regardless if they pick him at #15 or later.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:48 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.