![]() |
|
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dunta WAS good, yes! But last year he was coming off a bad injury. He only got to play in the last part of the season and he still wasn't full speed yet. So it is still problematical if he is or WILL, get back to his old self. So saying, I want the Texans to continue to negotiate in good faith until we find out what his fair market price is going to be. If, say by June, he is not signed, is time enough to think about the dreaded tag.
__________________
NBT - Elder statesman. Wisdom comes with age - Now if i could remember what it was! |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
If Dunta is indeed tagged, it will happen in February. I don't have the exact date on me, but it will definitely be before UFA signing begins.
fyi - I'm guessing the transition tag is roughly $8.0 million... problem is a match might mean a poison pill, which would be a big problem. Plus, transition tags come with no compensation. Both reasons are why you don't see the transition tag used all that much. and... welcome dalemurphy. Braves fan? |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Is a transition tag the same as a franchise tag?
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
They're different. F-tags are offered the top 5 average salaries, T-tags are top 10. F-tags give the old/current team a right to match, and if they choose not to, they then receive two first round picks from the new team. T-tags give the old/current team the right to match an offer but no trade compensation if they choose not to.
Scout.com seems to think they know the tag #s for 2009, though I haven't confirmed yet how official this is. Fwiw though: Quote:
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
They should at least it make so that the T-Tag is compensated with one #1. Some teams would probably be willing to spend or receive a #1 for some players. I could certainly see that being the case with someone like DRob.
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I think that is effectively how the f-tag works. I don't recall anyone having to actually give up two, first rouders on a guy, I am sure it has happened, I just can't recall. More often once the f-tag is used if another team is interested they work out a trade with the current team for something below the two 1st rounders
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
I'm assuming that poison pills are kind of a non-issue with the collective bargaining agreement ending and the uncapped year in 2010. But, that's just a guess. I just think the transition tag is a way to negotiate with Dunta if he's demanding huge dollars without destroying the team's relationship with him, franchise him, and end up in the same position next year- only with a higher franchise level. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Quote:
No team would ever give up two #1s for Dunta, but if the Texans f-tagged him, they might be in a better position to negotiate a trade for more reasonable compensation if so desired, a position that would be basically non-existent if Dunta received a transition tag. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
More on Dunta and the tag written here:
http://www.inthebullseye.com/archive/2009/20090130.html Those franchise and transition #s I posted in this thread yesterday look good, too. |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Wonderful article as usual. You captured my thoughts perfectly.
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
|
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|