Anyone else hoping the top 3 QBs go before the Texans pick?

[painekiller]

Originally Posted by chuck

Dude. I knew Bob literally has no sense of humor whatsoever and would not spot my post as extreme self-deprecation but I expected most of the other regulars to get what I was doing. See, unlike SOME people around here I actually recognize and to a degree embrace the space in the Venn diagram where chuck and the absurd overlap. And, because I have a sense of humor and despite what you may think do not take myself particularly seriously when it comes to sports commentary, I am happy to joke about it.

.

Nice post, from someone who who missed your tone on that one.

[barrett]

I think Brock is more likely to give us what we need to win (solid, above average QB play) than anyone in the draft. He's less of a dice roll. This move was made to complete a team that was competitive despite the QB the last two years.

But I also think Brock has a relatively low ceiling, and he costs us 5 times more money. Teams like Seattle and Indy operated with a $15 million+ cap bump by playing a rookie QB. That allows you to screw up a lot and still put together a great roster because you get to spend 10% more than the rest of the league. I would have liked that advantage for our front office since they've been known to screw up plenty.

[HPF Bob]

Good point. Now that the Seahawks have to actually *pay* Russell Wilson, Pete Carroll isn't looking as smart.