![]() |
#61
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I think the regular continent-hopping that the London players would do would more than outweigh any advantage a prolonged homestand might have.
|
#62
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
A distinct advantage would come if the London team had home playoff games. The travelling US-based team would have no buffer time. I'm sure the NFL wouldn't give a rats-arse, but it would be an advantage nonetheless. I personally can't stand the idea of a London-based team. I think it causes more problems than it's worth.
|
#63
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Pretty much agree, teams already have some trouble adjusting to 3 time zones. Try another Euro League if really need to expand overseas, try a B league with some percent of Euro citizen players involved, perhaps with some B league cities her e in Americas.
|
#64
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
We're talking about the Jaguars here, dude. Let's remain realistic.
|
#65
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Generally, London seems forced. Can't imagine this market really wants an NFL team. The league though is just looking for new revenues. Mexico City would make more sense for a first international team (not counting when the Bills play in Toronto or somesuch). |
#66
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Merry Christmas and Happy New Year Everyone. Wishing us all a great 2016.
I might be wrong, but seems with Weeden at QB, then our WR, RB, even TEs, seem to be doing better. Maybe a maturing process , takes a little patience with these mostly young players and coaches and revolving QB. And Texans at 8-7, have a few good wins to go with their blooper losses. BUT a 34- 6 win is pretty good against any team. |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|