IntheBullseye.com  

Go Back   IntheBullseye.com > Hot Reads ...In the Bullseye > The Other 31 Teams
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #6  
Old 03-17-2015, 08:12 PM
barrett barrett is offline
All-Pro
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 2,902
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Warren View Post
In 1993, every team had two bye weeks so the 16-game regular season was spread over 18 weeks. Ratings dipped so they went back to one bye the next year. I wouldn't be surprised to see them try it again. I would think that revenue from the extra week of games would more than offset a drop in ratings in the various TV markets in weeks when the local teams were off. Plus they could spin it as a player safety move.

I'm just relieved that Sean Gilbert lost his bid to be the NFLPA executive director. That was a work stoppage waiting to happen.
But in 1993 Fantasy Football was in its infancy. Today, football fans watch every game almost as much as they watch their home team. I watched a Tennessee-Jacksonville game last year on a Thursday night because it was the only game on. I think the ratings impact would be next to nothing and the extra 1-2 weeks of programming to sell would be huge. Plus it has a player safety appeal like you said. To me an extra bye week elevates the level of play and lets guys get healthy. While increasing games lowers the level of play and increases injuries.

I'd also be in favor of eliminating 1 or 2 preseason games.
Reply With Quote
 

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:24 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.