Time to look at changes?

[popanot]

Originally Posted by Arky

OK..... Can you explain why he would "like to agree with me but...."? I've said a lot of things in this thread and wondering specifically which one...

I see NBT post a lot here and a) it's usually one or two sentences, b) sometimes vague/general and c) sometimes "zingerlike".

I don't think he is necessarily disagreeing with anything you said. I think he's just using your comment "Maybe we're just slow starters" as a springboard and saying something to the effect of - 'don't count on any quick turnaround because the problems that have been there for years still persist today'. I think he's implying he 'wishes' we are just slow starters (thus he would like to agree with you but...). At least that's how I took his post.

[Arky]

Originally Posted by popanot

I don't think he is necessarily disagreeing with anything you said. I think he's just using your comment "Maybe we're just slow starters" as a springboard and saying something to the effect of - 'don't count on any quick turnaround because the problems that have been there for years still persist today'. I think he's implying he 'wishes' we are just slow starters (thus he would like to agree with you but...). At least that's how I took his post.

OK, that sounds logical.

Was just wondering because my first statement was in response to the "Tennessee sat on the ball" debate and the second statement was just a jest - maybe not a good one, but eh... thought the razzy face would help it out....

Time to move on.....