IntheBullseye.com  

Go Back   IntheBullseye.com > Hot Reads ...In the Bullseye > The Texans
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-13-2014, 04:02 PM
HPF Bob HPF Bob is offline
All-Pro
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 4,149
Default

You could be right. If the price goes down, that will make it all the easier to pull the trigger on a deal.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-13-2014, 04:38 PM
Arky Arky is offline
Hall of Fame
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 9,291
Default

He'll have to get in line. We haven't had time to bitch about Mallet and Savage, yet....
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-13-2014, 04:54 PM
WMH WMH is offline
Pro Bowler
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,795
Default

You want a guy that can't beat out Hoyer? He even had the advantage of being a 1st round pick and couldn't grab the reigns.

I'd rather roll the dice with Winston.

Same maturity problems, better NFL potential, IMHO.
__________________
In B'OB we trust, until he pisses us off!
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-13-2014, 04:59 PM
barrett barrett is offline
All-Pro
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 2,902
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by WMH View Post
You want a guy that can't beat out Hoyer? He even had the advantage of being a 1st round pick and couldn't grab the reigns.

I'd rather roll the dice with Winston.

Same maturity problems, better NFL potential, IMHO.
Way different maturity problems. Manziel had a fake ID and signed some autographs. Winston had shoplifting, multiple run ins with police, rape investigation that still hasn't entirely gone away, and the loud table top misogyny.

Winston is bigger and more likely to play 16 games. Aside from that I'd give every nod to Manziel. I don't think I want either of them, but I don't want any of the other guys coming out/available either.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-13-2014, 05:48 PM
chuck chuck is offline
All-Pro
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,845
Default

I'd rather have Manziel than Winston but that's like saying I'd rather have gonorrhea than syphilis.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 10-13-2014, 06:14 PM
Warren Warren is offline
Regular Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 623
Default

I don’t see a trade for Johnny happening since the Texans probably could have moved up from #33 to get him in the draft if they’d wanted to (it cost the Browns #26 and the 3rd rounder that the Texans ended up getting to take Nix). O’Brien said later that there wasn’t any debate about trading up for him. The Browns also may not be in a big rush to get rid of him, remembering when they thought the Hoyer-like Derek Anderson was “the guy,” although the leadership in Cleveland has turned over several times since then. And under the current CBA, even though Johnny was a first-rounder he’s not eating up a big chunk of cap space. I’d be interested for the right price but I don’t think O’Brien would be.

I can’t see the Texans (McNair especially) wanting any part of Winston. It’s unlikely he’ll be prosecuted for sexual assault, possibly due to the police at best mishandling or at worst hindering the investigation, but he could still face university discipline. And with all that still going on, in the midst of the Ray Rice furor, he does the student union thing, seemingly totally oblivious to how that would look.

I haven’t seen much of Hundley but I know he’s taken a lot of sacks and there’s been talk that he holds the ball way too long. Not exactly a trait of successful NFL QBs. The more Cousins plays, the less he looks like a potential quality NFL starter.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 10-13-2014, 06:39 PM
HPF Bob HPF Bob is offline
All-Pro
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 4,149
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Warren View Post
I don’t see a trade for Johnny happening since the Texans probably could have moved up from #33 to get him in the draft if they’d wanted to
They may have believed that he or Bridgewater would fall through the first round for them and gambled a trade-up would not be necessary. They sure spent a lot of time pre-draft studying him when they had a 1-1. Maybe that was just to pacify the Aggie faithful or energize the local media but we sure saw lots of stories how the Texans should take him.

McNair doesn't seem worried about attendance however.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 10-13-2014, 06:20 PM
Nconroe Nconroe is offline
All-Pro
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Lake Conroe
Posts: 2,897
Default

It looks like Cleveland has over 20 mil cap space so they can easily keep both QB and even sign some other high impact player.

If Manziel demands out likely that lowers trade value even further.

I'd like to see Mallett and Savage some at some point when clear out of playoffs.

Maybe anything possible but unlikely Manziel to Texans is my thinking.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 10-13-2014, 08:50 PM
barrett barrett is offline
All-Pro
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 2,902
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nconroe View Post
It looks like Cleveland has over 20 mil cap space so they can easily keep both QB and even sign some other high impact player.

If Manziel demands out likely that lowers trade value even further.

I'd like to see Mallett and Savage some at some point when clear out of playoffs.

Maybe anything possible but unlikely Manziel to Texans is my thinking.
They CAN easily keep both, but Manziel is the last thing you want in a backup. You want your backup to keep his head down and chart plays, stay ready, and be a pro. You don't want him to be a star, a distraction, or competition if you have anointed someone else your starter. If Cleveland signs Hoyer to a long term extension (he's a FA next year and the price tag keeps going up right now), then no way do they want Johnny around.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:40 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.