IntheBullseye.com  

Go Back   IntheBullseye.com > Hot Reads ...In the Bullseye > The NFL Draft
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-28-2014, 08:58 AM
Joshua Joshua is offline
Regular Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 549
Default

And to answer your hypo, coming away with the best QB and a decent defensive player is always preferrable to coming away with the best defender and a decent QB.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-28-2014, 11:30 AM
popanot popanot is offline
Pro Bowler
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,916
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Joshua View Post
And to answer your hypo, coming away with the best QB and a decent defensive player is always preferrable to coming away with the best defender and a decent QB.
Not if I don't like the QB's at the top of the draft. I'm not taking a QB I don't like or think is way overvalued at #1 just because I need a QB.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-28-2014, 06:05 PM
barrett barrett is offline
All-Pro
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 2,902
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by popanot View Post
Not if I don't like the QB's at the top of the draft. I'm not taking a QB I don't like or think is way overvalued at #1 just because I need a QB.
I totally agree with this. Don't force it if you don't think any of the 3 are 1st round talent.

I don't get the idea that if you don't go QB 1.1 you should at 2.1 or you should immediately trade for some relatively young guy. Why force a mediocre prospect (Carr), when you wouldn't force a good prospect (Bridgewater)? Why throw away the 33 pick? If your future at QB is not there, sign a stop gap veteran, don't draft a guy who excelled at behind the LOS passes in a gimmick offense, against terrible competition.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01-28-2014, 07:41 PM
chuck chuck is offline
All-Pro
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,845
Default

I've decided that Bridgewater is the real deal and will be happy if the team takes him. But I certainly see both sides of this. It's clear that to win in this league you need a top quarterback. It's also clear that reaching for a guy when you're desperate for a quarterback gets you a Matthew Stafford (or much, much worse). Stafford's pretty good but I don't see him winning a Super Bowl.

If those guys aren't convinced that any of the available QBs can and will take the Texans to the Super Bowl then I'm happy to wait and get the best football players available at #1 and #33 and go from there.

To answer a question occasionally asked around here, yes, I would have been content to watch Tony Banks play for a few years. It turns out I had no idea just how content I would have been, in fact.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 01-29-2014, 09:18 AM
barrett barrett is offline
All-Pro
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 2,902
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by chuck View Post
I've decided that Bridgewater is the real deal and will be happy if the team takes him. But I certainly see both sides of this. It's clear that to win in this league you need a top quarterback. It's also clear that reaching for a guy when you're desperate for a quarterback gets you a Matthew Stafford (or much, much worse). Stafford's pretty good but I don't see him winning a Super Bowl.

If those guys aren't convinced that any of the available QBs can and will take the Texans to the Super Bowl then I'm happy to wait and get the best football players available at #1 and #33 and go from there.

To answer a question occasionally asked around here, yes, I would have been content to watch Tony Banks play for a few years. It turns out I had no idea just how content I would have been, in fact.
I like a lot about Bridgewater. His pro style offense credentials are very intriguing. Of course, Leinhart was a pro style guy out of college too, so some of just comes down to good old fashioned talent.

Hopefully Teddy is well prepared AND talented. Most of all, I really hope there is a QB that is worth 1.1, since this is likely the best chance at a franchise QB that we will get this decade. Even if we delay, it's not like there is some QB in next year's class to get all excited about (no Andrew Luck on the horizon).

So unless Tom Brady breaks his neck this year, gets cut, and goes looking for work in 2015, I hope we come out of this draft with a real QB.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 01-29-2014, 10:44 AM
Keith Keith is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,761
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by chuck View Post
It turns out I had no idea just how content I would have been, in fact.
Hahaha, yes, the power of hindsight.

You wouldn't say this about Kent Graham though.
__________________
Support ...IntheBullseye.com and follow us on Twitter
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 02-07-2014, 12:38 AM
HPF Bob HPF Bob is offline
All-Pro
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 4,149
Default 2-5-14 Update

1. Blake Bortles, QB, Central Florida

(I'd rather have Bridgewater over Bortles,)

2. Antonio Richardson, OT, Tennessee

(Won't argue with this)

3. Jeremiah Attaochu, DE-OLB, Georgia Tech

(ILB Christian Jones of Florida State would be my choice)

4. E. J. Gaines, CB, Missouri

(overall not bad but disagree with Bortles at 1-1)
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 02-16-2014, 02:25 AM
painekiller painekiller is offline
All-Pro
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Near the Galleria
Posts: 2,852
Default Feb 12, 2014

1 Blake Bortles, QB, Central Florida
33 Antonio Richardson, OT, Tennessee
65 Carl Bradford, DE/OLB, Arizona State
97 Brandon Thomas, G/OT, Clemson


I could see this, not sure I like it, but I could see it.
__________________
There is no failure, only feedback.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:23 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.