IntheBullseye.com  

Go Back   IntheBullseye.com > Hot Reads ...In the Bullseye > The Texans
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-15-2013, 04:11 PM
chuck chuck is offline
All-Pro
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,845
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by barrett View Post
We may not like the professional decision makers in Houston, but it is better than having some guy with a business sense acting out his whims as a fan because his bank account lets him.
I don't view it as an either/or proposition.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-15-2013, 05:04 PM
barrett barrett is offline
All-Pro
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 2,902
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by chuck View Post
I don't view it as an either/or proposition.
I agree with you that they are not entirely mutually exclusive. But I do think owners who value winning first do not truly exist. These are guys who are all about money. That is how they got where they are. They do not throw away money in the name of ideals. They might be willing to spend short term to secure a superbowl, but every owner in the NFL is self serving and business first. They use public money to build stadiums, and then they charge the public for the right to buy tickets in public funded stadiums (PSLs). Owning an NFL team is basically a right to print money (at taxpayer expense).

Now some owners are content to own a franchise and be a part of the club. Clearly Bob McNair values being a "well respected" member of the owners fraternity more than the W/L record of the Texans. I am fine with that. I don't think Bob Kraft is any different. He just made 1 really good hire a decade into his ownership. Same thing with any of the other generally quiet owners who have won superbowls. They keep their head down, collect mountains of cash, and enjoy the perks of being filthy rich.

NFL owners as a group know very little about the game of football and should have nothing to do with game of football decisions. I like the ones who are content to fleece the paying customers on the business end, and not play amateur football "genius".

I don't know of a single NFL owner who is proactive about winning first, but smart enough to let actual professionals make the decisions.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-16-2013, 12:24 AM
chuck chuck is offline
All-Pro
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,845
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by barrett View Post
I am fine with that.
Really? No, really?

You view this whole thing as a random lottery?
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-16-2013, 07:49 AM
barrett barrett is offline
All-Pro
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 2,902
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by chuck View Post
Really? No, really?

You view this whole thing as a random lottery?
Not at all. I just think owners have little positive influence and best serve a team by staying out of the way and cutting checks (even if they spend more to make more). McNair does both of those and because of that is no obstacle to winning. Any good head coach could win with an owner like McNair. Even Kubiak with all his flaws has won with McNair as an owner.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-16-2013, 08:36 AM
BigBull BigBull is offline
Regular Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 268
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by barrett View Post
Not at all. I just think owners have little positive influence and best serve a team by staying out of the way and cutting checks (even if they spend more to make more). McNair does both of those and because of that is no obstacle to winning. Any good head coach could win with an owner like McNair. Even Kubiak with all his flaws has won with McNair as an owner.
^^^this^^^ My only problem with McNair is that in my opinion he is to patient with his coaching staff. I think he needs to put them on a shorter leash.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 10-16-2013, 10:37 AM
nunusguy nunusguy is offline
All-Pro
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Houston
Posts: 2,399
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BigBull View Post
^^^this^^^ My only problem with McNair is that in my opinion he is to patient with his coaching staff. I think he needs to put them on a shorter leash.
Kubiak is coming off of 2 successive double-digit winning seasons & 2 successive AFC South division championship seasons including 12 wins last year. If McNair were to delay firing Kubiak until after this season is over, would that still be too much patience for you ?
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 10-16-2013, 12:19 PM
BigBull BigBull is offline
Regular Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 268
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by nunusguy View Post
Kubiak is coming off of 2 successive double-digit winning seasons & 2 successive AFC South division championship seasons including 12 wins last year. If McNair were to delay firing Kubiak until after this season is over, would that still be too much patience for you ?
I not talking about just this year. I don't think he should have given Kubiak the extention in the first place and this team started falling apart last season. Kubiak should have been fired after the defensive coordinator debacle. I believe he waited to long with Dom Capers too.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:01 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.