IntheBullseye.com  

Go Back   IntheBullseye.com > Hot Reads ...In the Bullseye > The Texans
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-10-2013, 10:50 PM
Nconroe Nconroe is offline
All-Pro
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Lake Conroe
Posts: 2,897
Default

It seems the main question is pace, lots of variables in plays per game.

Anyways, after one week Texans had 75 offensive plays, the same as San Francisco and two less than 77 offensive plays by Philadelphia.

As far as team offensive stats, Texans were third behind Denver and San Fran.

Similarly team defense ranked third overall behind Titans and Seattle.

And Schaub was fourth overall ranked passer in yards and passer rating.

So, atleast after one week some of these theories discussed might not hold much water.

But sure, we could get better and hopefully we are progressing that way.

Now after four weeks or 16 weeks will have a better measure and who knows where this will end up.

Last edited by Nconroe; 09-12-2013 at 01:10 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-11-2013, 06:30 AM
popanot popanot is offline
Pro Bowler
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,916
Default

Not sure I put much weight into offensive play totals. While it can give an indication of pace, there are a lot of other factors that go into it. Factors like the opposition turning the ball over (or just plain stinking it up with 3 and outs), or perhaps the offense has numerous long drives from dinking it up and down the field. Those can run up offensive play totals too.

Anyway, when I brought up pace, I wasn't necessarily talking quick-snap move-move-move all the time like the Eagles want to do. It's more about getting back after a play and being at the LOS quickly. And then if the situation merits a quick-snap, do it. The Broncos, 49ers and Packers use almost all of the play clock on the majority of their plays, but they're up at the LOS so fast it puts incredible pressure on the D.

I loved our pace in the 2nd half. I'd be happy with that pace if they ran it the majority time rather than only when they're down and in panic mode. I don't know, maybe this has more to do with Kubiak not having confidence in Schaub being able to run it or calling the right play/audible. Maybe Kubiak doesn't feel we can physically do it. It'd be nice to see them try it though. Maybe against the Titans??
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-12-2013, 12:59 PM
Foo'ball Fool Foo'ball Fool is offline
Drafted Rookie
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 82
Default

This is a good thread. Yes the up-tempo offense is fun to watch, etc. Y'all have covered the bases here. New England does run a chunk of the Oregon offense, but what they do really well is change the pace. One play, it's hurry back to the line and throw a quick slant. Then they may hurry to the line, then audible to something else, using up the play clock. It makes it hard to substitute players, and it keeps the defense guessing. Someone mentioned that a disadvantage can be that you end up gassing your own defense. What the Pats do gives their defense some time to rest between possessions. The Eagles ran Kelly's offense the whole 1st half, and their defense was worn out in the 2nd half.The Texans defense occasionally gets caught napping when the other team, playing a "normal" offense, suddenly hurries to the line and runs a play. I'd definitely like to see the Texans do that once in awhile. Barrett was right. NFL coaches will learn ways to control that offense, just like they're figuring out how to defend the zone read, and how they figured out the Run-and-Shoot, the veer, etc.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:44 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.