IntheBullseye.com  

Go Back   IntheBullseye.com > Hot Reads ...In the Bullseye > The Texans
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #6  
Old 02-19-2013, 12:22 PM
nunusguy nunusguy is offline
All-Pro
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Houston
Posts: 2,399
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by barrett View Post
40 time can be important for WRs if it confirms speed or lack of speed seen on film. But if a guy is very fast on film and slow by stop watch like Kendall wright last year, the 40 time might be completely ignored.
I knew that Wright was the Titans' 1st round pick last year, but was unfamiliar with his Combine performance until I checked, and sure enough his record shows
a very unimpressive 4.61 forty and frankly I'm surprised ? And BTW, I realize that's about the same 40 time that the player usually rated the greatest receiver of all time ran when coming out of college, but that was > 25 years ago and with the improvements in training, equipment, running surface, etc., the great Jerry Rice runs much faster than 4.6 in a current-day Indy combine.
But as you point out, nothing is more important in evaluating potential than the tape on a player, and obviously the Titans liked what they saw in Wright's tape. But neither does a stop-watch lie, and I'd be reluctant to use the 20th overall on a WR with such pedestrian long or sprinting speed. He may be quick, even explosive, but pure sprinting speed is also very important for outside NFL WRs.
BTW, how did Wright do his rookie year in Nashville, I've no idea right off hand ?
Reply With Quote
 

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:31 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.