![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Vikings rush for 2. 3rd and 6 coming up.
Vikes kneel it. Tick, tick, tick... On 4th and 7, Vikings kneel it again. Texans take over on downs with 21 seconds left and they kneel it. Final Score: Vikings 23, Texans 6 Man, I've been kinda neutral on Schaub over the years but he just hasn't looked real good lately and the offense centers around him.... I think they will be ready to go at Indy - they should be.... It's not a "breather" game anymore... Last edited by Arky; 12-23-2012 at 03:00 PM. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The defense has some issues, but nothing like the offense. Even with Schuab's mediocre arm, if he just had some mobility it would make a big difference in some
situations. But that line, they are gonna have to make it top priority in next years Draft, we've got to upgrade our offensive line at multiple positions. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
But Schaub's arm and legs (or lack of), and the OL have all been a part of a highly successful offense in the very recent past. We entered the NE game as the #2 scoring offense in the NFL, now we've managed a total offensive flop in NE (with some garbage time stats), and 1 offensive TD and 7 FGs in the last two games against mediocre teams.
We are rarely attempting to throw the ball deep, we have almost stopped running the bootleg, and have completely stopped the bootleg throwback. Kubiak has gone into ultimate "no chances/play not to lose/conservative mode" and the execution has not been there to convert the 3rd downs (or make the early downs work). What happened to the offense that went to Denver and hit long TD passes off of Play action and allowed the run game to get going. That offense was a safety's nightmare. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
That was a ridiculously bad showing as a team. They did manage to hold AP to under 100 yards, but that didn't help. Sounds like Fosters irregular heartbeat is gonna be ok.
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I had this same thought, but that makes no sense, does it?
__________________
There is no failure, only feedback. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
It made sense against Indy and New England because we were apt to see them again. It makes no sense against Minnesota because it wouldn't matter what they saw against us. There is the thought of keeping something off future game films but, otherwise, why would they ever run some of the plays? It's usually only trick plays that you keep off of film.
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
There is nothing left to hide with this offense. Everyone in the NFL is familiar with the principals since it has been continuously used since the mid 80s. None of our players are a suprise either. I can't come up with any other reason why we're calling plays like this, but it still blows my mind that we all of a sudden stopped doing all of the things that worked so well. Especially since we built the whole offense around the bootleg and none of the pieces are really equipped to excel in a drop back offense or in a power running scheme. We have to create run/pass confusion or we are not very good.
|
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|