IntheBullseye.com  

Go Back   IntheBullseye.com > Hot Reads ...In the Bullseye > The Texans
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-18-2012, 10:15 AM
HPF Bob HPF Bob is offline
All-Pro
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 4,149
Default

One thing DeSean Jackson does that the others don't is he *commands* coverage, meaning d-coords will have to account for both he and AJ at *all* times because of his home run potential. But the maturity issues scare me, the same as with Steve Johnson. Knowing McNair's reputation for boy scouts, I don't think Jackson will fit in unless AJ sits on the lad to keep his head straight.

Colston would be my preferred choice here. He is used to being in an offense where the ball gets spread around and is a low-ego guy. He also catches the ball in traffic and runs great routes But Colston is probably a replacement for Walter, not JJ and you JJ-haters are going to be upset if/when that happens. We'd still need JJ as a stretch-the-field option.

Wallace would be a great add but he's restricted so I wouldn't get anyone's hopes raised. Bowe drops too many passes and some of the others are either too slow or are head cases.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-18-2012, 10:40 AM
barrett barrett is offline
All-Pro
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 2,902
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by HPF Bob View Post
One thing DeSean Jackson does that the others don't is he *commands* coverage, meaning d-coords will have to account for both he and AJ at *all* times because of his home run potential. But the maturity issues scare me, the same as with Steve Johnson. Knowing McNair's reputation for boy scouts, I don't think Jackson will fit in unless AJ sits on the lad to keep his head straight.

Colston would be my preferred choice here. He is used to being in an offense where the ball gets spread around and is a low-ego guy. He also catches the ball in traffic and runs great routes But Colston is probably a replacement for Walter, not JJ and you JJ-haters are going to be upset if/when that happens. We'd still need JJ as a stretch-the-field option.

Wallace would be a great add but he's restricted so I wouldn't get anyone's hopes raised. Bowe drops too many passes and some of the others are either too slow or are head cases.
I agree %100. Of this list I would want Colston. He is big and physical and gives us the kind of body/blocker we look for in a #2, but with far superior receiving skills. He is also a replacement as a #1 if injury again demands it.

Like Bob said though, he is not at all a JJ replacement. But for salary reasons I would just as soon see JJ AND walter released. I think Walter could be cut and brought back on the cheap (or even brought back later in a DA situation, I just don't think he would be as valuable to anyone else as he is to us due to blocking).

But JJ could be easily replaced in the draft. In the age of the spread offense there are a million guys who are great in the slot and return kicks. Maybe there is even another WR/PR/DB/KR/ST guy playing QB for some mid-major and available late in the draft like an Eddleman.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-18-2012, 11:13 AM
Keith Keith is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,761
Default

Colston is 29 and is damaged goods. Too much risk for my taste.
__________________
Support ...IntheBullseye.com and follow us on Twitter
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01-18-2012, 11:16 AM
NBT NBT is offline
Pro Bowler
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: S.E. Texas Coast
Posts: 1,836
Default

The only thing JJ is is a fumble about to happen.
__________________
NBT - Elder statesman. Wisdom comes with age - Now if i could remember what it was!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:08 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.