IntheBullseye.com  

Go Back   IntheBullseye.com > Hot Reads ...In the Bullseye > The Texans
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #81  
Old 01-01-2012, 09:52 PM
barrett barrett is offline
All-Pro
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 2,902
Default

If Casey was on new England they would have invented him a position and he'd catch 10 TDs. Instead we bury him. Not sure why.
Reply With Quote
  #82  
Old 01-01-2012, 10:24 PM
chuck chuck is offline
All-Pro
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,845
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by barrett View Post
If Casey was on new England they would have invented him a position and he'd catch 10 TDs. Instead we bury him. Not sure why.
Exactly. Casey creates such coverage mismatches. Think of a defense having to cover him and OD and AJ and JJ and Walter on one play. If they do, great, Arian has an insane amount of room to work, just what he does best. I don't know why they don't split Casey out wide. If the defense puts a corner on him the speed guy in the slot should be able to write his own script. If they float a LB out Casey will abuse him.
Reply With Quote
  #83  
Old 01-02-2012, 12:22 AM
HPF Bob HPF Bob is offline
All-Pro
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 4,149
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by chuck View Post
Exactly. Casey creates such coverage mismatches. Think of a defense having to cover him and OD and AJ and JJ and Walter on one play. If they do, great, Arian has an insane amount of room to work,
And we would be flagged for too many men on the field (5 receivers plos Arian) but the point is made. Casey ought to get more looks.

Last edited by HPF Bob; 01-02-2012 at 12:11 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #84  
Old 01-02-2012, 12:40 AM
Keith Keith is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,761
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by HPF Bob View Post
And we would be flagged for two many men on the field (5 receivers plos Arian) but the point is made. Casey ought to get more looks.
Ha, good point.

The Texans ran quite a few plays with 3 TEs on the field today. I liked it. Who knew drafting all those TEs would pay off... since all 3 of those guys, plus OD, are all good pass catchers, there's bound to be a mismatch somewhere once the ball is snapped.
__________________
Support ...IntheBullseye.com and follow us on Twitter
Reply With Quote
  #85  
Old 01-02-2012, 12:08 PM
HPF Bob HPF Bob is offline
All-Pro
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 4,149
Default

The Patriots are burning up the league with their Gronkowski-Hernandez combo.

You actually can have five receivers and Arian if Arian is running the Wildcat but then how useless would those five receivers be?
Reply With Quote
  #86  
Old 01-02-2012, 09:54 PM
barrett barrett is offline
All-Pro
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 2,902
Default

I can't remember who it was, but someone earlier this year argued that you can't have a TE or RB as your #2 option and we need a better #2 wr. Well, New England got 2300+ yards and 25 TDs from their TEs, and new Orleans top 2 targets were Graham and sproles. We definitely have no shortage of weapons if we can get them all on the field healthy.
Reply With Quote
  #87  
Old 01-02-2012, 10:13 PM
popanot popanot is offline
Pro Bowler
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,916
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by barrett View Post
Well, New England got 2300+ yards and 25 TDs from their TEs, and new Orleans top 2 targets were Graham and sproles. We definitely have no shortage of weapons if we can get them all on the field healthy.
I don't think anyone would confuse our TEs to Gronk/Hernandez and Graham, and we certainly don't have a Brees or Brady throwing to them. I could flip your comment around and say GB is doing just fine with multiple threats at WR and very little at TE this year. I like our TEs, QB play with Schaub and our running game, but to say or imply we couldn't use an upgrade at WR beyond AJ is being shortsighted, IMO. The way I see it, WR and CB are top priorities next year. Throw an OL and NT in there too.
Reply With Quote
  #88  
Old 01-02-2012, 11:07 PM
barrett barrett is offline
All-Pro
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 2,902
Default

I would absolutely put Daniels with Hernandez. OD is slower but runs better routes, has better hands, and blocks better. Foster is as dangerous as sproles or any rb.

If we run it 30+ times we are at our best. Then get the ball to AJ, foster, OD, and the other TEs. How many balls are left? Our problem is definitely not a lack of weapons.
Reply With Quote
  #89  
Old 01-02-2012, 11:21 PM
Keith Keith is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,761
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by barrett View Post
Our problem is definitely not a lack of weapons.
List of our problems:

1. Lack of healthy weapons
2. Kareem Jackson
__________________
Support ...IntheBullseye.com and follow us on Twitter
Reply With Quote
  #90  
Old 01-02-2012, 11:33 PM
barrett barrett is offline
All-Pro
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 2,902
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Keith View Post
List of our problems:

1. Lack of healthy weapons
2. Kareem Jackson
Jackson is on a list of his own.

And I think we have plenty of healthy weapons, we just lack a trigger man to get it to them.
Reply With Quote
  #91  
Old 01-06-2012, 03:18 PM
NBT NBT is offline
Pro Bowler
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: S.E. Texas Coast
Posts: 1,836
Default

I like all 3 of our TEs too, but I would still love to see the Team draft a more viable #2WR this year.

I sometimes wonder why Kubiak drafted all those young TEs, if he weren't going to better integrate into them into the offense.
__________________
NBT - Elder statesman. Wisdom comes with age - Now if i could remember what it was!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:08 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.