IntheBullseye.com  

Go Back   IntheBullseye.com > Hot Reads ...In the Bullseye > The Texans
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-26-2010, 12:15 PM
painekiller painekiller is offline
All-Pro
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Near the Galleria
Posts: 2,852
Default

Being a DE in college is not the same as being a DE in the NFL. Shepard is quicker than the OGs he will face in the middle, but he is not fast enough to play against the OTs in the NFL, IMO.

DT is the correct position for him in the 4-3 we run.
__________________
There is no failure, only feedback.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-26-2010, 01:50 PM
WMH WMH is offline
Pro Bowler
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,795
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by painekiller View Post
Being a DE in college is not the same as being a DE in the NFL. Shepard is quicker than the OGs he will face in the middle, but he is not fast enough to play against the OTs in the NFL, IMO.

DT is the correct position for him in the 4-3 we run.
I just hope it freaking works......if we can at least get into the lower middle of the pack D, we would be able to do some damage.

While I have faith in the O, we can't survive week in and week out coming back in the fourth quarter. It just ain't gonna happen.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-26-2010, 01:56 PM
Arky Arky is offline
Hall of Fame
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 9,291
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by painekiller View Post
Being a DE in college is not the same as being a DE in the NFL. Shepard is quicker than the OGs he will face in the middle, but he is not fast enough to play against the OTs in the NFL, IMO.

DT is the correct position for him in the 4-3 we run.
I dunno, man. He might have Freeney-like quickness. But the larger point is we won't know till he gets some live reps. Live games always shake out different than practice or preseason. Let's have a look and then we can judge....
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-26-2010, 04:40 PM
painekiller painekiller is offline
All-Pro
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Near the Galleria
Posts: 2,852
Default

let me be clear, I like Shepard a lot. He impressed me at the open practices, no one could block him.

His biggest asset that I saw was his burst of the ball. Maybe he can move outside, time will tell that, but I don't see it.

But as for his potential at DT, I see him and Mitchell as a great combo together in a couple years.
__________________
There is no failure, only feedback.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-27-2010, 02:32 AM
cland cland is offline
Veteran Depth
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 132
Default

This is just a thought, but it seems like the Texans are trying to copy a page out of the Giants and Eagles play book. With the Texans best blitzing LB in Cushing moving to the middle spot as well as the signing of smaller, gap-penetrating DTs, I am expecting to see a lot more blitzing through the A gap (between the guard and center).

Typically most of the Texans' blitzing has come from the edges allowing a little half-step more time for the QB--even when it is successful. The nice thing about the center blitz is that it's fairly easy to show and pull back without affecting the scheme. When the fake works it can force a mis-alignment that your gap penetrating DTs can get through, or it makes doubling the edge (aka. Mario Williams) much more difficult.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 10-27-2010, 02:36 PM
NBT NBT is offline
Pro Bowler
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: S.E. Texas Coast
Posts: 1,836
Default

Blitzing will only work if the DB can maintain cover on the WR for 3 to 4 seconds, which means the quick ins, Screens, and flats. So far we haven't seen this from our DBs. frank Bush, I hope you are working the heck out of your guys these past two weeks to improve on this.
__________________
NBT - Elder statesman. Wisdom comes with age - Now if i could remember what it was!
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 10-27-2010, 09:05 PM
superbowlbound superbowlbound is offline
Veteran Depth
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 126
Default

I think we're at the point now where we HAVE to blitz anyway. Our guys can't cover when we give them extra help, they're still giving up big plays, and it's not gonna get any better, barring a light bulb coming on. Let's try to get after the quarterback. Clearly we get beat if he has time to throw, so let's get exotic with our blitzes, see if we can't disrupt some rhythm. We're getting beat for big plays anyway, so let's get aggressive, see if we can't create some of our own. Like cland said, I think we're gonna be blitzing a lot up the middle, especially in indy. Okoye was dominant in week 1 getting to that A gap and getting penetration. He was in Manning's lap all day, and that game was never in doubt. Let's maximize the formula. Take away his room to step up into the pocket, and he makes errant throws. Get the pressure by any means necessary, maybe we luck into a couple confidence-inspiring ints by the corners, and we can start getting this D turned around so we can make the push we all know we've got in us!
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 10-28-2010, 05:50 PM
NBT NBT is offline
Pro Bowler
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: S.E. Texas Coast
Posts: 1,836
Default

My gut hunch is Frank Bush would like to do more "exotic" blitzing. It is 'Ol conservative Kubiak that is afraid it will put his offense in a bad position. As I say, just my hunch.
__________________
NBT - Elder statesman. Wisdom comes with age - Now if i could remember what it was!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:26 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.