|
|
#145
09-19-2010, 06:47 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Schaub 38 of 52 for 497 yards. But Foster only 19 for 69 officially. He ran well, good enough, and we won. Way to go Rackers.
Looking at Stats , we deserved to win, but we were so far behind, sure didn't feel like it. HOUSTON STATISTICS WASHINGTON 29 First Downs 21 6 Rushing 3 23 Passing 17 0 Penalty 1 43% (6 of 14) Third Down Efficiency 20% (2 of 10) 50% (1 of 2) Fourth Down Efficiency 0% (0 of 0) 526 Total Net Yards 421 81 Total Offensive Plays 58 5-45 PENALTIES: Number-Yards 7-58 0-0 FUMBLES: Number-Lost 0-0 39:49 TIME OF POSSESSION 31:47 
|
|
#146
09-19-2010, 06:50 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
We are just letting everyone know that we are multi-dimensional... Damn...Shaub almost threw for 500 yards...  
|
|
#148
09-19-2010, 06:54 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
I never doubted we'd win this game. I lied, actually I can't believe we won !
Can I revise my my prediction for an 8-8 season ? I firgured this would be a close game coming right down to the end. That part I had right but I also thought it would be low scoring, which it sure wasn't. Whatever, I'll gladly take it. Now we have to get ready for the NFC SB rep next week. Say have they fired Wade yet ?
|
|
#149
09-19-2010, 07:04 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
In a 16 game schedule, every game is just so important. Last year's playoff tie breaker showed us that if we didn't see it already. In the end of the season they only care about how many you win and lose. Nobody cares how you win them.
And that's good, because today was one ugly win for an undeserving team. But in December it will just count as one in the W column. Way to go Texans.
|
|
#152
09-19-2010, 07:27 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
It's tough for a rookie CB to open his career against Peyton Manning and Donovan McNabb. I thought Jackson played well over all but they were clearly picking on him and he's going to need to make a couple of really big plays or they'll keep picking on him all year.
Can you get used to this? THE AFC SOUTH LEADING HOUSTON TEXANS!!! We have the division lead all to ourselves for possibly the first time in our history.
|
|
#153
09-19-2010, 08:57 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Question: I was suprised that Kubes didn't let Rackers attempt the 52 yarder, but then later thought about the wind being a possible issue. 2nd half kickoffs in that direction were a TON shorter than they were in the first half. Did anybody catch whether the goalpost flags were moving at the time of the potential 52 yard kick? Last edited by today; 09-19-2010 at 09:17 PM.
|
|
#154
09-19-2010, 09:40 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#155
09-19-2010, 10:17 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Pollard is the man!!
Great game, great, great game. I wish our DB's could just play a little better defense, but I think it may have to do with all the zone we play. And like HPF Bob stated, this was Peyton and McNabb.... And nice call icing the rookie kicker, Kube's had some real head-scratchers in the first half, but that made up for it.
|
|
#156
09-20-2010, 12:36 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
I think Kubiak knew Rackers was not reliable from 50+ yards, having never kicked one in real NFL competition. He chose to punt whereas I would have tried to go for it on 4th and 4,
From the 35, if you fail on fourth down, the Redskins take it over from that spot on an incomplete. If you miss the FG, they take it over at the 42 where the theoretical kick would be tried. The punt went into the end zone and the Redskins took over at the 20. If Houston goes for it and succeeds on fourth down, maybe they wind up with something like a 45-yd FG for the win if they can make 7 yards. Obviously, if he tried the long FG and succeeds, the game is over. So, it's a risk-reward equation. The punt is the safest play but you may not get the ball back. The FG was the riskiest play but you can end the game right there. Going for it would have been the middle ground but, if you succeed, you are almost sure of a better FG try. Yes, the winning FG was kicked in the same direction and appeared to have plenty of distance. We won so it's all smiles but if Washington won on their FG try, Kubiak would have had a lot of second-guessing.
|
|
#157
09-20-2010, 02:19 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Its scary though, I mean, we're going to need a 50+ yarder at SOME point. Should we carry two kickers or something? It would be ridiculous to blow a roster spot on one but what if we come down to a playoff game and we need a 50+ yarder?
|
|
#158
09-20-2010, 02:39 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Neil Rackers, for his career is 19-of-39 from 50+.
|
|
#159
09-20-2010, 05:21 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#160
09-20-2010, 08:33 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
 |
| Bookmarks |
|
|
Linear Mode
