![]() |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
http://www.dallasnews.com/sharedcont...k.3cacf47.html
Despite his reputation, I think he is way off on Spiller and Thomas still being on the board when we pick. And if they both are, he's off on who we pick. I think we would definately go Thomas over Spiller. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I just have not seen CJ Spiller show good north south skills needed by the Texans. I'd think the Texans would take Thomas, too.
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
He's predicting a Cowboy trade up, and the most likely to me is Tennessee. If that's the case, then Kyle falls.
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I would feel a lot more comfortable with this choice if our offensive line was more settled. Has anyone heard any info on Pitts. Is he done officially or on his way back and they know something we don't. That would change the picture.
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
My prayers on offensive line.
Dear Lord, Let Wade Smith be of sufficient talent to become the starting center. If he isn't, please make it so. I pray that Caldwell has become a beast at RG. Give guidance to Rick Smith in finding that LG who will fortify a rejuvenated running attack. Please grant Winston and Brown good health, added strength, and some good luck. Peace be with you and please don't strike me down for self centered prayers. Amen |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
It seems to me Gosselin's top 100 player list is always more accurate than his mock. I have found Lance Zierlein's final mock to be more accurate at least in recent years.
http://blogs.chron.com/fantasyfootba...ock_draft.html |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Don't care which one you use. I don't want an RB in 1st round! Not enough value unless the F.O. knows something that we don't, which BTW is highly likely!
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
To me it's a BPA sort of thing. IMO, we need a player at almost every position. On offense, we could use a better RB, OL, and shoot, I could even make a case for having another stud WR if Bryant or one of the top WRs falls and he's the obvious BPA. AJ's not getting any younger and we still don't have a high-quality #2 WR. On defense, it's DL/NT, OLB, DB. That pretty much covers the whole gamut of positions you'd consider using your #1 on. I don't care what position they take as long as it's upgrade to a need and it's not some wild-arse selection (e.g., Jason Babin). I'd be perfectly happy with Ryan Mathews if it finally solves the RB problem long-term.
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The words running back and long-term don't belong in the same sentence, hehe. We have had two decent RB's and neither lasted more than a year. We need a line first and then we'll get as good a RB as we can find after that. That is just my opinion. Now my opinion is not worth much or I would be in someone's war room drafting and getting well-paid for it instead of sitting at my computer talking about it.
![]() |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
__________________
There is no failure, only feedback. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
4. RB C.J. Spiller 5. S Earl Thomas 7. LB Sean Weatherspoon 9. CB Devin McCourty 10. CB Kareem Jackson It's close, but I'm taking Spiller. You don't pass up Barry Sanders type talent to get Bob Sanders. Yeah, I like Bob Sanders too.
__________________
Originally Posted by chuck I'm just sitting here thinking (pacing, actually) that whatever my issues with Kubiak he is apparently a goddam genius at tutoring quarterbacks. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Gosselin's top 20 on the board:
13. Jimmy Clausen QB Notre Dame 30. Rodger Saffold OT Indiana 32. Sergio Kindle OLB Texas 33. Taylor Mays S Southern Cal 34. Rob Gronkowski TE Arizona 36. Brian Price DT UCLA 38. Sean Lee MLB Penn State 39. Nate Allen S S. Florida 40. Koa Misi DE Utah 41. Golden Tate WR Notre Dame 42. Daryl Washington OLB TCU 43. Chris Cook CB Virginia 44. Charles Brown OT Southern Cal 45. Everson Griffen DE Southern Cal 46. Terrence Cody NT Alabama 47. Damian Williams WR Southern Cal 48. Tony Moeaki TE Iowa 49. Ben Tate HB Auburn 50. Navorro Bowman OLB Penn State 51. Regus Benn WR Illinois 52. Colt McCoy QB Texas He has Toby at 65. Last edited by TexanJedi; 04-22-2010 at 10:12 PM. Reason: Forgot all about Clausen |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|