IntheBullseye.com  

Go Back   IntheBullseye.com > Hot Reads ...In the Bullseye > The Texans
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-21-2008, 04:35 PM
Joshua Joshua is offline
Regular Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 549
Default

Hasn't Kubiak only carried 2 QBs on the 53 man roster? Has he indicated that he plans to deviate from this this year?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 07-21-2008, 04:40 PM
papabear papabear is offline
Regular Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Houston
Posts: 838
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Joshua View Post
Hasn't Kubiak only carried 2 QBs on the 53 man roster? Has he indicated that he plans to deviate from this this year?

That was the story during the Quinn Gray experiment....that not having someone behind Sage last year when Schaub was out really scared him. Kubiak claimed he was a changed man and wanted to have three QB's this year....I never bought it. I just assumed that was just spin until a deal for Sage was final. That never happened and they released Gray. It will be interesting to see if he does go with three.

I think it's possible that Brink beats out Boyd if he does.
__________________
"Well, at least our players kept their helmets on, so that showed some intelligence"-BobMcNair
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07-21-2008, 05:06 PM
Joshua Joshua is offline
Regular Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 549
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by papabear View Post
That was the story during the Quinn Gray experiment....that not having someone behind Sage last year when Schaub was out really scared him. Kubiak claimed he was a changed man and wanted to have three QB's this year....I never bought it. I just assumed that was just spin until a deal for Sage was final. That never happened and they released Gray. It will be interesting to see if he does go with three.

I think it's possible that Brink beats out Boyd if he does.
If he truly wanted a number 3 behind Sage, Gray seems like he would have been a perfect candidate. I can't imagine why we would cut Gray if we wanted a third QB on the roster. I'll be very surprised if we carry a third QB (and will be second guessing our release of Gray).
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 07-21-2008, 05:40 PM
painekiller painekiller is offline
All-Pro
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Near the Galleria
Posts: 2,852
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Joshua View Post
If he truly wanted a number 3 behind Sage, Gray seems like he would have been a perfect candidate. I can't imagine why we would cut Gray if we wanted a third QB on the roster. I'll be very surprised if we carry a third QB (and will be second guessing our release of Gray).
The team never said it, but McClain referred to Gray not bothering to learn the playbook, it was inferred that Gray was sign to be Schaubs backup and Sage would be traded, and when that did not happen Gray pouted.

Kubiak never called him out in public, but let him go, and the last I saw he had not been resigned anywhere.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:19 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.