Quote:
Originally Posted by nunusguy
Here's my logic: NFL coachs are like employees in any industry in that they probably value job security more than monetary compensation or any other element when it comes to employment opportunities. So with that in mind and knowing the most talented get the best opportunities, going to work for regimes like Shanahans in Washington or Carrolls in Seattle would represent the top-range of job security while those where the HC has only a single year remaining on his contract would represent the other extreme.
Now of course if Kubiak gets an extension of time on his existing contract to reduce the uncertainy of his longevity here in Houston, that's changes things.
|
I think your logic is seriously flawed here. There is no way you can say the guy with the longest contract has the best job and is thus the best coach.
You have guys who are payed more for two years then another guy is for 4. It would be insane to say I have a better job making 500k for 4 years then you have making 2 million for 2 years. Not to mention buyout levels, bonuses, etc... These contracts are not simple things. They are also not concrete or permanent. You could be under contract for years when some crypt keeper takes out his overhead projector and explains why he isn't going to pay you anymore money.
Either way, Kubiak runs our offense and I am not extremely concerned about who the OC is, as long as Kubiak is comfortable.
01-11-2010, 01:46 PM
Threaded Mode