IntheBullseye.com  

Go Back   IntheBullseye.com > Hot Reads ...In the Bullseye > The Texans
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-17-2008, 03:37 PM
infantrycak infantrycak is offline
On the Sidelines
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 6
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by papabear View Post
Why do you say that? I remember their comments as being that they think he is better suited to the man scheme that we run....wouldn't that mean that they plan on doing the same thing we've been doing with Reeves that we have done with other corners?

....or am I missing something?
As I recall, they also made several comments about him playing better in bump and run rather than with a big cushion. There was also a comment by Bennett I believe about working on hand work for bump and run with Ray Rhodes.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 06-17-2008, 03:40 PM
papabear papabear is offline
Regular Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Houston
Posts: 838
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by infantrycak View Post
As I recall, they also made several comments about him playing better in bump and run rather than with a big cushion. There was also a comment by Bennett I believe about working on hand work for bump and run with Ray Rhodes.
I guess I missed that ....or it just didn't stick. Either way I think it is a good idea to mix it up a little and let the corners be a little more aggressive occasionally.
__________________
"Well, at least our players kept their helmets on, so that showed some intelligence"-BobMcNair
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 06-17-2008, 03:42 PM
kravix kravix is offline
Regular Starter
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 285
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by infantrycak View Post
As I recall, they also made several comments about him playing better in bump and run rather than with a big cushion. There was also a comment by Bennett I believe about working on hand work for bump and run with Ray Rhodes.
Thats what I remember from the post signing interviews also. It would mean no more Faggins and a 12 yard cushion and more press at the line and disturb routes.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 06-18-2008, 01:06 PM
cadams cadams is offline
Regular Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 461
Default

7 yard cushion was necessary last year. does anybody really want petey doing bump and run coverage?
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 06-18-2008, 01:38 PM
papabear papabear is offline
Regular Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Houston
Posts: 838
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cadams View Post
7 yard cushion was necessary last year. does anybody really want petey doing bump and run coverage?
That's not necessarily going to be any worse. I wouldn't think he has the size to effectively "bump" some of today's big WR, but some guys are just better playing tighter press coverages. Some are better if they can sit in a zone and read everything.

I'm not saying that Petey is going to be better as bump and run corner. Only that it's not automatic that if a guy struggles with one technique that he will automatically struggle just as badly in another.
__________________
"Well, at least our players kept their helmets on, so that showed some intelligence"-BobMcNair
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 07-04-2008, 03:43 PM
Brando Brando is offline
On the Sidelines
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 5
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by infantrycak View Post
As I recall, they also made several comments about him playing better in bump and run rather than with a big cushion. There was also a comment by Bennett I believe about working on hand work for bump and run with Ray Rhodes.
Watch the one on one segment on houstontexans.com and it will also give an indication the defense will be playing a lot of bump and run.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Patti Smith
What do you like most about the sytem and staff here?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jacques Reeves
It allows me to play up on the receivers more.

Therefore I can get my hands on the receivers and dictate what they do and easier to read routes that way.

LINK
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 07-05-2008, 04:30 PM
NBT NBT is offline
Pro Bowler
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: S.E. Texas Coast
Posts: 1,836
Default

I, for one, am sure that Jacque Reeves will NOT play like P-Buc, for the simple reason that he was signed by Rick Smith, not Charlie Casserly!

I go to the other message boards in our division because I like to see how ludicrous their homerism can become. The two worst, of course, are 1. The Jags, and 2. the Titans. Both seem to have more than their fair share of post puberty teen agers.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 07-05-2008, 09:13 PM
edo783 edo783 is offline
Regular Starter
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Tomball
Posts: 313
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by NBT View Post
I, for one, am sure that Jacque Reeves will NOT play like P-Buc.
I'm not sure why, but I have just have a feeling that will be true statement. Like you, I have a lot more faith in who did the choosing on this one.
__________________
Old age just comes at a real bad time.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:17 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.