IntheBullseye.com  

Go Back   IntheBullseye.com > Hot Reads ...In the Bullseye > The Texans
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

View Poll Results: Sign Vick for the Minimum for 2 years?
Yes please. 2 8.33%
No thanks. 22 91.67%
Voters: 24. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-29-2009, 01:32 PM
Nconroe Nconroe is offline
All-Pro
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Lake Conroe
Posts: 2,897
Default

I guess if someone gave me a choice of Vick or Farve I'd pick Vick right now, but hopefully it never comes to that choice.

I heard some guy on radio say Tony Dungy was Vicks counsellor right now and he was putting his reputation on the line for Vick. And he guessed maybe one of Dungy's good friends who coach might take Vick as a favor, which could be Pittsburgh or Chicago, not that either needs him.

Not much else to talk about for a couple more days.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 07-29-2009, 02:29 PM
nunusguy nunusguy is offline
All-Pro
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Houston
Posts: 2,399
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nconroe View Post
I heard some guy on radio say Tony Dungy was Vicks counsellor right now and he was putting his reputation on the line for Vick. And he guessed maybe one of Dungy's good friends who coach might take Vick as a favor, which could be Pittsburgh or Chicago, not that either needs him.
The thing is this is more of a business decision than a football decision. If it weren't for the business ( which of course includes sponsers, team PR, etc.)
end of it, probably most of the teams in the league would take a shot at Vick if they could come to terms about the money.
So no matter how much Dungys HCoaching buddies may feel beholden to repay him for past favors, they've got to clear this decision with the guy who pays all the bills.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07-29-2009, 02:48 PM
coloradodude coloradodude is offline
Regular Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 255
Default

Interesting thoughts.

Personally, I couldn't stand the guy as a QB because he ran when he should've been going through his reads. Similar problem with Vince Young.

But I would love to know what Gibbs thinks about him, behind closed doors as opposed to some interview he's given in the past, because his opinion is the one that truly counts.

If we go 10 and 6 without him or 12 and 4 with him, I'd take him. I no longer value the character issue when it comes to the NFL because they seem to have an entirely different level of legal standards than I do, much like politicians.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 07-29-2009, 09:23 PM
superbowlbound superbowlbound is offline
Veteran Depth
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 126
Default

I've gotta say "pass" on this one. I absolutely think he should have another shot at the NFL, and I think this conditional reinstatement is the best thing for him. He certainly won't be up to speed by week 1, and not allowing him back till week 6 gives him and whatever team signs him a built-in excuse for sub-par play. Methinks Miami is his best fit, since he's a wildcat-running OC's wet dream, though I think that is a bit of a long shot, especially since they just invested a 2nd round pick in pat white, who I like a whole helluva lot.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-06-2009, 09:20 AM
Big Texas Big Texas is offline
Pro Bowler
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,469
Default

Me personally, I like the guy's skill set. An analyst from nfl network (the name escapes me) puts it best to me. When Vick was in the league, concerning athleticism only, Vick was 10 steps ahead of everyone else. If he comes back even half that he is still a threat for any team.

However, we had the third best offense last season. Our interest now is on defense.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:50 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.