IntheBullseye.com  

Go Back   IntheBullseye.com > Hot Reads ...In the Bullseye > The NFL Draft
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-26-2009, 01:30 PM
Nconroe Nconroe is offline
All-Pro
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Lake Conroe
Posts: 2,897
Default

Shipley, Clemons, Jennings my likely guesses , FWIW. There are several
RB's out there to consider at this time.
  #2  
Old 04-26-2009, 01:37 PM
idymoe idymoe is offline
Veteran Depth
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Boise, ID
Posts: 158
Default

I think they have to go running back here. Jennings, Peerman or Ian Johnson.
  #3  
Old 04-26-2009, 01:40 PM
WMH WMH is offline
Pro Bowler
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,795
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by idymoe View Post
I think they have to go running back here. Jennings, Peerman or Ian Johnson.
We've been saying that for 3 rounds.........
  #4  
Old 04-26-2009, 01:45 PM
Big Texas Big Texas is offline
Pro Bowler
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,469
Default

Im hoping for Jennings
  #5  
Old 04-26-2009, 01:46 PM
TexanJedi TexanJedi is offline
Regular Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 277
Default

If we want him we can have him. No way the Giants take another back, unless they trade....
  #6  
Old 04-26-2009, 01:52 PM
gunslinger57 gunslinger57 is offline
Drafted Rookie
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 72
Default

Texans love them some versatility this year.

James Casey, TE, Rice.
  #7  
Old 04-26-2009, 01:52 PM
jcp jcp is offline
Drafted Rookie
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 57
Default

are we trading owen daniels?
  #8  
Old 04-26-2009, 01:57 PM
dadmg dadmg is offline
Veteran Depth
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Spearfish, SD
Posts: 203
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jcp View Post
are we trading owen daniels?
I don't think so. But, of our potential big free agents in the next few years, Daniels would be the one that I am not crazy about paying megabucks for. If they can develop someone to replace him and hang onto our other guys, I can deal.
  #9  
Old 04-26-2009, 02:22 PM
sinnister sinnister is offline
Veteran Depth
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Shreveport, La
Posts: 165
Default

I am wondering if they are going to try and work with Hill as an OL prospect. I dont see us keeping 4 TEs, but who knows. I do like the Casey pick, and he may be another OD. I guess we will find out soon enough.
  #10  
Old 04-26-2009, 01:40 PM
Roy P Roy P is offline
All-Pro
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,761
Default

Jax just added Jarett Dillard, to go with Thomas and Holt. We better be able to get some pass rush and cover.
__________________
Originally Posted by chuck
I'm just sitting here thinking (pacing, actually) that whatever my issues with Kubiak he is apparently a goddam genius at tutoring quarterbacks.
  #11  
Old 04-26-2009, 01:45 PM
Roy P Roy P is offline
All-Pro
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,761
Default

McKillop next to Willis in SF. The 49ers just got better.
__________________
Originally Posted by chuck
I'm just sitting here thinking (pacing, actually) that whatever my issues with Kubiak he is apparently a goddam genius at tutoring quarterbacks.
  #12  
Old 04-26-2009, 01:47 PM
sinnister sinnister is offline
Veteran Depth
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Shreveport, La
Posts: 165
Default

I like Jennings, Canfield, D.Byrd. If Ricky Jean Francois keeps falling, he would be a good pick as well. Oh, forgot about Freeman.
  #13  
Old 04-26-2009, 01:50 PM
dadmg dadmg is offline
Veteran Depth
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Spearfish, SD
Posts: 203
Default

And the Giants grab Bomar the pick before us. Oh well.
  #14  
Old 04-26-2009, 01:52 PM
James James is offline
Undrafted Rookie
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Houston
Posts: 43
Default

Another TE . . .great
  #15  
Old 04-26-2009, 01:53 PM
papabear papabear is offline
Regular Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Houston
Posts: 838
Default

i'd love the casey pick if we didn't already take a TE....he could run the wildcat for us maybe???
__________________
"Well, at least our players kept their helmets on, so that showed some intelligence"-BobMcNair
  #16  
Old 04-26-2009, 01:54 PM
idymoe idymoe is offline
Veteran Depth
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Boise, ID
Posts: 158
Default

Wow! Casey. No way I thought he would wind up with the Texans. They must have thought him too good to pass up, because I'm pretty sure they would have expected to take a running back by the 5th round. I had Jennings in the 3rd round in mocks where he was available.
  #17  
Old 04-26-2009, 01:55 PM
TexanJedi TexanJedi is offline
Regular Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 277
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by idymoe View Post
Wow! Casey. No way I thought he would wind up with the Texans. They must have thought him too good to pass up, because I'm pretty sure they would have expected to take a running back by the 5th round. I had Jennings in the 3rd round in mocks where he was available.
He was listed at 71 on Gosselin's top 100. I think Rick Smith looked at his board and saw value. However, Ingram was rated even higher and is younger so he has more upside but there are injury concerns.
  #18  
Old 04-26-2009, 01:52 PM
TexanJedi TexanJedi is offline
Regular Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 277
Default

Wow, James Casey from Rice. Two TE's, did not see that. Good value though.
  #19  
Old 04-26-2009, 01:52 PM
gunn gunn is offline
Veteran Depth
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 149
Default

James Casey
  #20  
Old 04-26-2009, 01:54 PM
popanot popanot is offline
Pro Bowler
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,916
Default

What the hell, let's have Barwin convert back to TE too.
Closed Thread

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:23 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.