![]() |
#41
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Well, If I were the GM and the coach kept T. P. on the bench while a lesser talent got all the playing time, I might start looking for a new coach.
I've talked about this before, but I am not sure how the relationship between Smith is vs. how it should be. I understand the two needing to work together to develop an identity and a philosophy. However, I buy into the Head Coach working for the GM model. Maybe it's my prior military service, but that's just the way I see it. My observations of Smith is that he takes a lot of input from Kubiak. I would imagine if Kubiak fails to make progress this season, then both would have to be shown the door. Smith would not be able to say, I wanted Kubiak to play better player than player X but he just wouldn't listen, so I passed on drafting/signing player Y.
__________________
Originally Posted by chuck I'm just sitting here thinking (pacing, actually) that whatever my issues with Kubiak he is apparently a goddam genius at tutoring quarterbacks. |
#42
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
And where do you think this is happening? You aren't attempting to describe the situation at safety I hope.
|
#43
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
All I'm saying is if we draft for example William Moore and Chip Vaughn in the 2nd and 3rd respectively, whose to say they're gonna get the nod over Wilson, Ferguson, Barber, Harrison, Molden, Bennett, Reeves, Williams, and Pittman. How many DB's do we really need to draft this year with so many guys already fighting for minutes.
|
#44
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I guess the thought is if you have 23rd ranked defense a few positions ought to be upgradeable from guys you had the year before, although tough for a rookie to beat out a good veteran for playing time. And you need 82 guys at start of camp, and about 30 don't make it. New coaches and a year more experience will help as well.
|
#45
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
OK you got me with that one, but Chung's overall game is much better at this point.
__________________
There is no failure, only feedback. |
#46
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
The lesson I learned here is NEVER do more than 3 rounds. Secondly, stick with your gut instincts on YOUR draft board. The guy that you want in the 2nd round may very well be there in the 4th round. Lastly, nobody knows nothing until after the draft. It's easy to come in and cherry pick who you could have gotten in the 7th round after the fact. Also, those hidden gems are there because everybody else is looking for something completely different on the 2nd day. I had a draft board of 67 players, but could have filled my slots with what I considered 5th round talent, or better with a draft board of 48. I thought Moore, Vaughn, and Brown were all 2nd round talented players and could have drafted all three of them after getting what I considered the 6th best player in the draft (3rd best for our roster). In fact, I could have traded down to 42 and gotten him along with more draft picks. That's why the Professionals get paid the big bucks
__________________
Originally Posted by chuck I'm just sitting here thinking (pacing, actually) that whatever my issues with Kubiak he is apparently a goddam genius at tutoring quarterbacks. |
#47
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thanks Roy for all your great insights and sharing your hard work. You helped me feel much more informed this year.
|
#48
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Yeah, the mocks and forecasts are kind of silly. However, they provide a genuine service for us. They give us a framework to discuss team needs and also to talk about the exiting college talent. So, here's hoping you subject yourself to some more humble pie next year with a lot of 7 round mock drafts. I'll be complicit. Next year we can all be a little more aware that it is an exercise only and perhaps we won't sit around on draft day screaming that a guy we had rated 45th is sitting on the board in the 4th round. |
#49
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
No disrespect to anyone because we all have a right to do what they want with their own time, but I pay much more attention to player/team analysis and discussion than I do to someone's mock. That includes here as well as the Interwebs. Mocks are so damn silly to me and it's laughable at how wrong most people are on them. Especially ones that go beyond the 1rst or 2nd round.
|
#50
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I also want to add my thanks to Roy. I always read all his posts. One of my goals these days is to learn all I can about the Texans, and predraft predictions help me do that.
However, I do agree with Papanot that player/team analysis and discussion is ultimately much more important. |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|