IntheBullseye.com  

Go Back   IntheBullseye.com > Hot Reads ...In the Bullseye > The NFL Draft
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #9  
Old 04-09-2009, 08:10 AM
dalemurphy dalemurphy is offline
Regular Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 259
Default

Okay, here's one with 2 trades... both of them we are getting unfavorable points and they are deals the two teams are very likely to have interest in based on the Drafttek board and the team's situation:

Trade #1: 15 to phillie for 28 and 53 (has the 2 first rounders and may want to jump up and grab an OT or RB)
Trade #2: 28 and 5th in 2010 to NE for 34 and 89 (NE is looking to trade some picks for next year and trade up)

34. Clint Sintim (competition at SLB and ability to play DE on pass downs)
46. Darius Butler (gifted CB)
53. Louis Delmas (bested pure FS in the draft)
77. Rashod Jennings (talented, bigger back)
89. Antoine Caldwell (athletic C/G can play ZBS but more of a mauler than Myers)
112. David Bruton (athletic SS)
122. Terrence Taylor (run-stuffing DT that can push or replace Okam)
152. Javaris Williams (small college RB with a lot of production... powerful, good blocker, explosive)
188. Gronkowski (Powerful TE that is a very good blocker but has some hands also)
7th. P.J.Hill (Power RB that has too much upside not to grab this late)


Any scenario where we trade down should mean we take at least 2 RBs, maybe 3 out of this draft. Because there is room for 2, maybe even three RBs to actually make the team. Maybe I'm crazy but I would absolutely love this draft!

Last edited by dalemurphy; 04-09-2009 at 08:16 AM.
Reply With Quote
 

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:34 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.