IntheBullseye.com  

Go Back   IntheBullseye.com > Hot Reads ...In the Bullseye > The Texans

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old 01-19-2012, 11:56 AM
Joshua Joshua is offline
Regular Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 549
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by NBT View Post
Fonz and Joshua, Mario himself has had to be put on IR the last two years. Get the #2 WR in the Draft, but try to sign and trade Mario for a good veteran CB.
Mario played in all 16 games his first 4 years. In his fifth year, he played in 13 games and then went on IR because the team sucked and the season was effectively over, but I seem to recall the Texans indicating that he could have played out the string if the games had meant something (haven't looked for this but that is my recollection). Last year, he did miss 11 games after a freak pectoral injury. In short, last year is the only year he absolutely had to be shut down. If you think 1 non-knee/leg injury in 6 six years is enough to write him off, we'll just have to agree to disagree.

And to take your argument further, are you in favor of ditching AJ? He's 30 years old and missed 7 games in 2007, 3 games in 2010 (just like Mario) and 9 games in 2011 (2 less than Mario). Plus, his recent injuries have been leg-related and are much more likely to reoccur than Mario's.
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 01-19-2012, 12:22 PM
nunusguy nunusguy is offline
All-Pro
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Houston
Posts: 2,399
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Joshua View Post
Mario played in all 16 games his first 4 years. In his fifth year, he played in 13 games and then went on IR because the team sucked and the season was effectively over, but I seem to recall the Texans indicating that he could have played out the string if the games had meant something (haven't looked for this but that is my recollection). Last year, he did miss 11 games after a freak pectoral injury. In short, last year is the only year he absolutely had to be shut down. If you think 1 non-knee/leg injury in 6 six years is enough to write him off, we'll just have to agree to disagree.

And to take your argument further, are you in favor of ditching AJ? He's 30 years old and missed 7 games in 2007, 3 games in 2010 (just like Mario) and 9 games in 2011 (2 less than Mario). Plus, his recent injuries have been leg-related and are much more likely to reoccur than Mario's.
Mario is a very good defensive football player, but AJ will be the first Houston Texan to become a member of the NFL HOF and is clearly the best football player this franchise has had to date. So you are comparing apples and oranges. However there will probably come a time when the Texans need to approach Andre about restructuring his contract. And BTW, you are absolutely right about Mario's durability - he's been very dependable up until this past season.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 01-19-2012, 12:29 PM
Joshua Joshua is offline
Regular Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 549
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by nunusguy View Post
Mario is a very good defensive football player, but AJ will be the first Houston Texan to become a member of the NFL HOF and is clearly the best football player this franchise has had to date. So you are comparing apples and oranges. However there will probably come a time when the Texans need to approach Andre about restructuring his contract. And BTW, you are absolutely right about Mario's durability - he's been very dependable up until this past season.
That is true, but NBT appears to be suggesting that Mario is too much of an injury concern to keep. On that basis alone, AJ is much more of a concern. He injured both hamstrings this year in separate non-contact incidents. To me, this suggests that AJ is much more likely to miss time going forward than Mario. But, you are right that to compare players, you need to take into account not only their propensity for injury but also the caliber of player they are. AJ clearly is at the top of the heap in this regard.
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 01-19-2012, 01:10 PM
chuck chuck is offline
All-Pro
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,845
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Joshua View Post
And to take your argument further, are you in favor of ditching AJ? He's 30 years old and missed 7 games in 2007, 3 games in 2010 (just like Mario) and 9 games in 2011 (2 less than Mario). Plus, his recent injuries have been leg-related and are much more likely to reoccur than Mario's.
This is one reason why when anyone suggests that the team go find a #2 receiver I keep thinking, Well, how about trying to find a #1 receiver? I fully realize that there are only so many people on the planet who have the basket of skills that Andre has but I would hope the team is looking for someone in the draft who will be a monster for years to come rather than a marginally less stupid version of Jacoby Jones.
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 01-19-2012, 03:58 PM
jcp jcp is offline
Drafted Rookie
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 57
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by chuck View Post
This is one reason why when anyone suggests that the team go find a #2 receiver I keep thinking, Well, how about trying to find a #1 receiver? I fully realize that there are only so many people on the planet who have the basket of skills that Andre has but I would hope the team is looking for someone in the draft who will be a monster for years to come rather than a marginally less stupid version of Jacoby Jones.
This is my point...AJ is a premier WR1 when healthy but his health has begun to fade. I don't by any means want to get rid of him, but we must start looking for a WR1b that can step in when required.

I have no desire to lose Mario either...he provides premier depth at the OLB position...we need a 3-man rotation there. I'm clearly in the minority but I don't see the secondary as a need position this year. The two balls caught against KJ in BAL were exceptionally well covered but good throws and excellent catches. He has improved dramatically this year with some good coaching and I think he and Allen make a pretty good CB2 going forward with a developing rookie in Harris (and Carmichael) waiting in the wings.
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 01-19-2012, 07:48 PM
Nconroe Nconroe is offline
All-Pro
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Lake Conroe
Posts: 2,897
Default

So obvous thing is draft 2 WR fairly early this year.
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 01-19-2012, 11:07 PM
TheMatrix31 TheMatrix31 is offline
Pro Bowler
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,042
Default

Sign a guy like Early Doucet or Eddie Royal to be WR2 and draft another WR to compete with 'em and Walter. We don't have money for one of those top FAs anyway.
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 01-20-2012, 02:54 PM
jcp jcp is offline
Drafted Rookie
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 57
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nconroe View Post
So obvous thing is draft 2 WR fairly early this year.
Not necessarily opposed to this idea...but I'd say we should start drafting for WR3 replacement who could grow into WR2 role but drafting WR is very inexact science...moreso than most positions. For once we are real close and could be that one player away we've always dreamed of...I trust they can make the money work if a solid WR1b is available and wants to come collect some rings.

We aren't exactly in cap hell...challenging but doable
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 01-21-2012, 01:27 PM
angrydre angrydre is offline
Training Camp Fodder
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 17
Default

I'm not understanding all this garbage about getting rid of Mario. The kid plays through pain, and while looking only marginally comfortable (if even that) standing up, he still registered 5 sacks in 17 quarters. Get him comfortable, and he's got the potential to be sackmaster the likes of which the league has never seen. His cap number in 2011 was over $15 mil. and the cap is expected to jump around $10 mil. A backloaded deal isn't anywhere near prohibitively expensive. Besides, he came to a 2-14 football team and watched us grow up from the sidelines. You don't think a deep run into the playoffs is something he wants to be a part of, when it's something he's helped build from the ground up? I just can't see a scenario where we don't have everyone back next year. My gut says it won't happen. Angry Dre literally cried in public over the amount of money McNair gave him. I'm pretty sure he'd be willing to give a little back if it meant keeping Arian or Mario around and happy.

As for the actual point of this thread, I'd love a DeSean Jackson (if he can get some big boy pants), or Stevie Johnson, but I think a guy like Robert Meacham is gonna me more our speed. I've got a feeling Jason Allen walks, so we're gonna have to replace him, though Brice McCain did make strides in the second half.
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 01-22-2012, 06:06 PM
Nconroe Nconroe is offline
All-Pro
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Lake Conroe
Posts: 2,897
Default

Seems as I watch these playoff games a lot of WR drop catchable balls.

On DeSean Jackson
After the Eagles' season finale on Sunday, Jackson said he wanted to return to the team, and apologized for letting uncertainty about his contract affect his play this season. He had 58 receptions for 961 yards and four touchdowns in 2011.

Jackson was benched one game after missing a team meeting and sidelined late in another for dropping several passes.

This year Jackson had 58 catches with 4 TD, some big plays.

Last year he had 47 catches.

In 4 years he fumbled 12 times.

He was drafted 49th in second round.

He is 5 ft 10 inch, 175 lbs.

He wants a new contract at 10 mil a year.

Just me , think I'd try draft and save the money.
Reply With Quote
  #31  
Old 01-23-2012, 06:20 AM
itssharif itssharif is offline
Undrafted Rookie
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 29
Default

I know this thread is technically FA WR but was wondering.

Assuming we do a trade to get into the top 5 how much would we technically have to give up draft picks wise and whatever this amount is would it be worth it for Blackmon? The one thing I like about drafting from here on out is that they affect a team's cap a lot less after the way they handled it in the CBA. So it might as well be a hell of a lot more beneficial that we find out next stud WR through the draft. Just wondering.
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 01-23-2012, 07:08 AM
popanot popanot is offline
Pro Bowler
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,916
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by itssharif View Post
Assuming we do a trade to get into the top 5 how much would we technically have to give up draft picks wise and whatever this amount is would it be worth it for Blackmon? The one thing I like about drafting from here on out is that they affect a team's cap a lot less after the way they handled it in the CBA. So it might as well be a hell of a lot more beneficial that we find out next stud WR through the draft. Just wondering.
Here's the closest measuring stick... The Falcons moved up 21 spots to #6 last year to select Julio Jones. To do so, they gave up their 2011 #1, #2, #4, and their 2012 #1 and #4. IMO, we'd have to go higher than that to get Blackmon. That is a steep price to pay and I don't think there's any way the Texans would do it, nor should they.

Just as an FYI, Torrey Smith was taken at pick 26 in the 2nd round and who wouldn't love to have him right now...?? You don't have to give up your draft to find a good player.
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 01-23-2012, 10:45 AM
popanot popanot is offline
Pro Bowler
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,916
Default

To clarify my above statement re:Smith, I didn't mean we should have taken Smith over Reed. What I'm saying is who wouldn't rather have Smith with pick #58 as opposed to giving up all those picks ATL did to get Jones. Comparing the 2 WRs and the price, ATL paid an insane amount of picks to move up. It also proves we can potentially find a good WR with our current picks that fits in perfectly with what we need (someone like Smith).
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 01-23-2012, 10:53 AM
Joshua Joshua is offline
Regular Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 549
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by popanot View Post
To clarify my above statement re:Smith, I didn't mean we should have taken Smith over Reed. What I'm saying is who wouldn't rather have Smith with pick #58 as opposed to giving up all those picks ATL did to get Jones. Comparing the 2 WRs and the price, ATL paid an insane amount of picks to move up. It also proves we can potentially find a good WR with our current picks that fits in perfectly with what we need (someone like Smith).
The draft is such a crapshoot (just pull up any year and look at all the 1st round flameouts from supposedly can't miss prospects). As a general proposition, the only scenario I can really see trading away a bunch of picks to move up is to take a perceived franchise QB. That's about the only situation I would consider doing it.
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 01-23-2012, 11:18 AM
chuck chuck is offline
All-Pro
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,845
Default

Julio Jones is pretty good but come on.
Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old 01-24-2012, 03:55 PM
Fonz the Boss Fonz the Boss is offline
Regular Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 351
Default

Blackmon is going to be an NFL stud and perennial Pro Bowler but we will have to give up alot more than ATL did and I don't see that happening.
__________________
Follow Fonz_The_Boss on Twitter
Reply With Quote
  #37  
Old 01-25-2012, 12:19 PM
NBT NBT is offline
Pro Bowler
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: S.E. Texas Coast
Posts: 1,836
Smile

Quote:
Originally Posted by Joshua View Post
Mario played in all 16 games his first 4 years. In his fifth year, he played in 13 games and then went on IR because the team sucked and the season was effectively over, but I seem to recall the Texans indicating that he could have played out the string if the games had meant something (haven't looked for this but that is my recollection). Last year, he did miss 11 games after a freak pectoral injury. In short, last year is the only year he absolutely had to be shut down. If you think 1 non-knee/leg injury in 6 six years is enough to write him off, we'll just have to agree to disagree.

And to take your argument further, are you in favor of ditching AJ? He's 30 years old and missed 7 games in 2007, 3 games in 2010 (just like Mario) and 9 games in 2011 (2 less than Mario). Plus, his recent injuries have been leg-related and are much more likely to reoccur than Mario's.
JOSHUA, don't put words in my mouth. 1) Mario has been hurt, but I am interested in exploring what might be available if we franchise him, and see what kind of offers we might get. 2) He wants a huge contract, I think. 3) We now have 3 young pass rushers in Barwin, Reed, & Watt to put on the heat. 4) We have to give Foster a new very significant contract.

Try to stick to things I did say. To make your point by alluding to things I might have said about AJ will get you absolutely nowhere!
__________________
NBT - Elder statesman. Wisdom comes with age - Now if i could remember what it was!

Last edited by NBT; 01-25-2012 at 12:25 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #38  
Old 01-25-2012, 01:18 PM
Joshua Joshua is offline
Regular Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 549
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by NBT View Post
JOSHUA, don't put words in my mouth. 1) Mario has been hurt, but I am interested in exploring what might be available if we franchise him, and see what kind of offers we might get. 2) He wants a huge contract, I think. 3) We now have 3 young pass rushers in Barwin, Reed, & Watt to put on the heat. 4) We have to give Foster a new very significant contract.

Try to stick to things I did say. To make your point by alluding to things I might have said about AJ will get you absolutely nowhere!
I don't think I was putting words in your mouth. To "stick to the things you did say," the post I was responding to said "Fonz and Joshua, Mario himself has had to be put on IR the last two years. Get the #2 WR in the Draft, but try to sign and trade Mario for a good veteran CB." I read this to mean that you think Mario is too injury prone to be worth keeping. Is this putting words in your mouth? Really not sure how this post could be taken any other way.

As for AJ, where did I suggest you said something about him? I asked you a question. If you are hesitant to keep Mario because of injury concerns, do you have the same concerns for AJ, considering he has been more injury prone than Mario, as well as older and suffering injuries more likely to reoccur in the future. It was nothing more than a simple question.

As for your other points, I agree Mario will want a huge contract and reasonable minds can differ over whether the Texans should give it to him. I happen to think they should if they can make it work, but if you don't, I can certainly understand that. Reed did fill in well with Mario out but I don't think we've seen enough from him yet to confidently say we can let our best pass rusher walk.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:05 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.