![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
10 questions with Frank Okam on the official site is a must read.
The light has seemed to come on for the young man. He has thrown himself into being in the best shape of his life. He says he has lost 25 lbs. This is all good news. Now if Okam can dominate in the NFL like he did his junior year, and Frank Bush's system really does let the big guys penetrate, this defense can become a real difference maker. The last few years our defense has been weak against the run, and IMO the best way to stop the run is disrupt the play in the back field. Okam with his size and wiggle, and Okoye with his quickness can become real stars. With 2 DTs capable of shedding blocks so quick, O-lines are not left many options. Add this to Mario needing a triple team who is left to block Smith? I think Frank Okam's development has the potential to be the biggest gain this off season. Bigger than Cushing, or the signing of Smith.
__________________
There is no failure, only feedback. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
That would be really great for our defense if Okam can remain motivated to meet his apparent potential to be that big guy up the middle. Seems we are hearing a little about him quite often this off season, so maybe, gotta see what really happens. I'll root for Okam to become dominant.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I agree. It would be like found money for us if Okam takes a big jump. Very few things could help our defense next year more than the sudden appearance/development of a huge DT playing angry in the middle of the field. Obviously it's way too early to tell, but it would be nice.
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I'd want to actually see him performing well before considering him a big upgrade. If the light has truly come on, great. But I want to see proof.
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
That's my point. He hasn't shown anything in the NFL up to this point, and I don't think we were relying on him in any way. So if he shows up for camp and is a contributor, it would be a huge and unexpected bonus. I hope we see it.
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I am also waiting to see, thus the word potential.
Like barrett, I see few items that added to this team could impact as much as a huge DT playing angry. That is why I was looking for a true NT for this defense this offseason. But few men have the size/quickness combo that Okam brings.
__________________
There is no failure, only feedback. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
If Okam really were to reach "his potential" (which I'm very doubful of), then the teams defensive direction should be obvious: convert to the 3-4. Okam would be our NT and Mario and AS would both be excellenct 3-4 DEs. ILBs would be DeMeco & Diles and I think Cushing could play strong-side OLB
in the 3-4 just as he's going to be doing in the 4-3. And Barwin would be over on the weak side, as practically everybody feels that Barwin's "natural poistion" in the NFL is as a 3-4 OLB. What to do about Okoye ? Time to be honest with ourselves and cut our losses now - he just isn't gonna be the player in the NFL Smith & Kubiak hoped he would be. Not as a 4-3 one-gapper DT or anywhere else - lot a guys do well in college (especially in their senior year), and have disappointing pro careers. And we sure can't use him in the 3-4. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Are you serious with this post? First, there is no need to convert to a 4-3 simply because we found a guy that can play NT in it. The Ravens championship team played a 4-3 and had two guys (Sam Adams and Siragusa) that fit that description. Barwin comes into the league bigger and stronger than Dwight Freeney did and Jason Taylor- among others, who were both excellent DEs in 4-3 Defenses. Clearly, Brian Cushing fits the profile of a SLB in a 4-3. Most disturbing about your post is that you think we should go ahead and "cut our losses now" with Okoye. You don't think it's a little premature to quit on a 1st round talent at DT who is just about to turn 22 years old and entering his 3rd season in the NFL? Finally, our best defensive player (Mario), would become a much less effective playmaker in a 3-4 because he would be moved into the line and play almost every snap as a 5 technique. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Not to mention Demeco is very small to play ILB in the 3-4. Fewer DL in front of him means more OL getting into him, and his biggest weakness is getting off of blocks. And that Mario gets minimized as a pass rusher in the 3-4.
All around it would be a stupid idea to switch 7 guys' positions because one guy fits a 3-4 better. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
While I don't totally agree with a previous poster, I don't believe it would be a bad idea to switch to a 3-4 during games to throw off opposing offenses, especially to run blitzes or fake blitzes. I think the ability to have different lineups and looks would make us less predictable on defense and more disruptive in the backfield. Given some of the flexibility we have now on defense, I'd be open to the idea. I think Barwin could play DE, OLB or ILB in a 3-4, as well as Cushing. If Okam is going to have a breakout year, that could be HUGE for us this year with all the recent additions on defense.
I cant wait till August. |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
I'm just not very optimistic about AO and I don't think he's that valuable to us or most other teams. But AS is much more of a 3-4 DE than he is a 4-3 downlineman, either at DE or inside at DT. And Mario would be a premier 3-4 DE. Of course he's also a premier 4-3 DE, I wouldn't deny that. But this whole scenario is based on a hypothesis that Okam could be effective at nose, which would then also permit Barwin to realize his full potential as a 3-4 outside backer and not a downlineman in the 4-3. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
What are you basing that off of?
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Don't be too hasty on Okoye. The typical norm for DTs is three years to make an impact in the NFL, and sometimes more.
Just pull up the numbers on Haynesworth, who is widely considered the most dominant NFL DT. 2002 - 1 sack, 30 tackles 2003 - 2.5 sacks, 32 tackles 2004 - 1 sack, 36 tackles It took him 4 years to get his tackles up to 50 (52 in 2005) It took him 6 years to get his sacks over 5 (6 in 2007) The fact that Okoye came in as the youngest player ever doesn't help his ability to impact immediately. During last season I started seeing flashes of dominant play, but the high ankle sprain kicked in and hampered his efforts (Haynesworth has never started a full season btw.) |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
I think Okoye should be nicknamed 'the excuse' because that's all he amounts to thus far. |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|