Im going to stick this here, there were other places or a new thread but this works too I think.
I am certain that the last 2 years when the defence started getting better towards the end of the year we have heard that they are making the scheme simpler and being more agressive. Every year they are better at the end of the year, and this is the reason we get. Year 1-- Well it was just too much to take in all at once so we made it simpler. Year 2-- With all the injuries and new players we needed to make it simpler. Year 3- We decided to make it more simple and be more aggressive.
This isnt Pitt or Baltimore. Our defence cannot be nearly that complicated, and evidently the only team it confuses is our own.
This is just something I have noticed and it bugs the hell out of me. Maybe Richard Smith needs to tear out the last half of his Defensive Coordinator for Dummies book and stick with the front portion.
|