IntheBullseye.com  

Go Back   IntheBullseye.com > Hot Reads ...In the Bullseye > The Texans
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #61  
Old 12-28-2015, 08:03 PM
HPF Bob HPF Bob is offline
All-Pro
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 4,149
Default

I think the regular continent-hopping that the London players would do would more than outweigh any advantage a prolonged homestand might have.
Reply With Quote
  #62  
Old 12-29-2015, 08:31 AM
popanot popanot is offline
Pro Bowler
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,916
Default

A distinct advantage would come if the London team had home playoff games. The travelling US-based team would have no buffer time. I'm sure the NFL wouldn't give a rats-arse, but it would be an advantage nonetheless. I personally can't stand the idea of a London-based team. I think it causes more problems than it's worth.
Reply With Quote
  #63  
Old 12-29-2015, 09:32 AM
Nconroe Nconroe is offline
All-Pro
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Lake Conroe
Posts: 2,897
Default

Pretty much agree, teams already have some trouble adjusting to 3 time zones. Try another Euro League if really need to expand overseas, try a B league with some percent of Euro citizen players involved, perhaps with some B league cities her e in Americas.
Reply With Quote
  #64  
Old 12-29-2015, 11:25 AM
chuck chuck is offline
All-Pro
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,845
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by popanot View Post
A distinct advantage would come if the London team had home playoff games.
We're talking about the Jaguars here, dude. Let's remain realistic.
Reply With Quote
  #65  
Old 12-29-2015, 10:15 PM
Keith Keith is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,761
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by popanot View Post
A distinct advantage would come if the London team had home playoff games.
Over the long-term though this is probably much more of a disadvantage to a London team having to play road games in the playoffs. The London Jags would be smart to keep a second home of sorts on the continental US for training camps and for deep playoff runs.

Generally, London seems forced. Can't imagine this market really wants an NFL team. The league though is just looking for new revenues. Mexico City would make more sense for a first international team (not counting when the Bills play in Toronto or somesuch).
__________________
Support ...IntheBullseye.com and follow us on Twitter
Reply With Quote
  #66  
Old 12-30-2015, 09:36 AM
Nconroe Nconroe is offline
All-Pro
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Lake Conroe
Posts: 2,897
Default

Merry Christmas and Happy New Year Everyone. Wishing us all a great 2016.

I might be wrong, but seems with Weeden at QB, then our WR, RB, even TEs, seem to be doing better. Maybe a maturing process , takes a little patience with these mostly young players and coaches and revolving QB. And Texans at 8-7, have a few good wins to go with their blooper losses. BUT a 34- 6 win is pretty good against any team.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:04 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.