IntheBullseye.com  

Go Back   IntheBullseye.com > Hot Reads ...In the Bullseye > The Texans
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #41  
Old 10-27-2014, 08:50 AM
HPF Bob HPF Bob is offline
All-Pro
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 4,149
Default

We may be 4-4 and we may be second in our division (a game behind the Colts) but we have the fifth-worst record in the conference.

Tennessee (2-6), Jacksonville (1-7), NY Jets (1-7) and Oakland (0-7) are the only sub-.500 teams in the AFC.

By contrast 9 teams in the NFC are sub-.500.

So, yes, we have Tennessee once and the Jaguars twice but among the rest of the opponents, Cleveland might be the only other opponent where we could be considered a favorite and that might be a stretch.
Reply With Quote
  #42  
Old 10-27-2014, 11:35 AM
barrett barrett is offline
All-Pro
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 2,902
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by HPF Bob View Post
We may be 4-4 and we may be second in our division (a game behind the Colts) but we have the fifth-worst record in the conference.

Tennessee (2-6), Jacksonville (1-7), NY Jets (1-7) and Oakland (0-7) are the only sub-.500 teams in the AFC.

By contrast 9 teams in the NFC are sub-.500.

So, yes, we have Tennessee once and the Jaguars twice but among the rest of the opponents, Cleveland might be the only other opponent where we could be considered a favorite and that might be a stretch.
I agree with all of that. I just think we play in the worst division in football and the two teams below us are jokes.

Or look at it this way, if I set the over/under on 6.5 based on your prediction, what would you bet?
Reply With Quote
  #43  
Old 10-27-2014, 11:44 AM
barrett barrett is offline
All-Pro
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 2,902
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by WMH View Post
Based on what?
The only teams with a losing records outside of our division is Washington and Oakland.

IMO, that's hardly a easy schedule.
The NYG also have a losing record. The combined record of our 2014 schedule is 55-65-1. But even with that, I have to admit you are right. The competence of Cleveland and Buffalo, combined with Pittsburgh's huge win yesterday tells me this schedule has turned out to be harder than I thought.
Reply With Quote
  #44  
Old 10-27-2014, 12:33 PM
chuck chuck is offline
All-Pro
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,845
Default

If the Texans could eliminate the bone crushingly stupid things they do sometimes there's not a team on the schedule that they can't or even shouldn't beat. They don't play either of the two teams that the Texans effectively can't beat, the Broncos or the Patriots. I haven't seen a single game that I thought the Texans had no chance to win and doubt that I will. Although you can go ahead and use ink when you write in the game in Indy as a loss.
Reply With Quote
  #45  
Old 10-27-2014, 12:45 PM
Nconroe Nconroe is offline
All-Pro
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Lake Conroe
Posts: 2,897
Default

The nice thing is we have remaining 5 home games and three away games.

Philly, Bengals and Ravens are good teams we play at NRG stadium .

Colts and Cleveland away.

If we play with few turnovers and few penalties, like yesterday, could be we maybe win atleast four or five more games. Probably that exceeds my expectations when the year started.

It is a tough choice of trying to win vs see your possible future QB?

And Foster is great again, keep him several more years at this pace.
Reply With Quote
  #46  
Old 10-27-2014, 02:20 PM
WMH WMH is offline
Pro Bowler
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,795
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by barrett View Post
The NYG also have a losing record. The combined record of our 2014 schedule is 55-65-1. But even with that, I have to admit you are right. The competence of Cleveland and Buffalo, combined with Pittsburgh's huge win yesterday tells me this schedule has turned out to be harder than I thought.
Yep, forgot about the GMen. Looking at the schedule before the first whistle blew had me somewhat optimistic about a false showing, IE beating up on the scrap heap for a 8-8/9-7 record. Now that they're actually playing, its definitely turned in to a more competitive schedule than is typically placed on the last place team. The parity of the NFL is real, and certainly makes it more entertaining.

Quote:
If the Texans could eliminate the bone crushingly stupid things they do sometimes there's not a team on the schedule that they can't or even shouldn't beat. They don't play either of the two teams that the Texans effectively can't beat, the Broncos or the Patriots. I haven't seen a single game that I thought the Texans had no chance to win and doubt that I will. Although you can go ahead and use ink when you write in the game in Indy as a loss.
Wow, a semi postive thought from Chuck that I actually agree with. Definitely need to bookmark this page.
__________________
In B'OB we trust, until he pisses us off!
Reply With Quote
  #47  
Old 10-28-2014, 09:40 AM
popanot popanot is offline
Pro Bowler
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,916
Default

Anyone else notice the first play that Clowney was in for Lewan went right for his knees? Lewan knew exactly what he was going to do and didn't even think twice about ducking and diving for the knee. Clowney made a nice move to avoid getting taken out and Lewan later hurt his knee. Like they say, karma's a bitch.
Reply With Quote
  #48  
Old 10-28-2014, 04:00 PM
nunusguy nunusguy is offline
All-Pro
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Houston
Posts: 2,399
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by WMH View Post


Yep, forgot about the GMen. Looking at the schedule before the first whistle blew had me somewhat optimistic about a false showing, IE beating up on the scrap heap for a 8-8/9-7 record. Now that they're actually playing, its definitely turned in to a more competitive schedule than is typically placed on the last place team. The parity of the NFL is real, and certainly makes it more entertaining.



Wow, a semi postive thought from Chuck that I actually agree with. Definitely need to bookmark this page.
I know man, relatively speaking this is like the Chuckster going absolutely pollyanna on the Texans - hey I'm gonna start shopping for playoff tickets
@ NRG.
Reply With Quote
  #49  
Old 11-05-2014, 01:35 PM
barrett barrett is offline
All-Pro
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 2,902
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by WMH View Post
Based on what?
The only teams with a losing records outside of our division is Washington and Oakland.

IMO, that's hardly a easy schedule.
I know I came around to your thinking that our schedule was harder than it first looked, but our remaining schedule is the 3rd easiest in the NFL.

http://grantland.com/the-triangle/nf...n-the-numbers/
Reply With Quote
  #50  
Old 11-05-2014, 02:46 PM
Nconroe Nconroe is offline
All-Pro
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Lake Conroe
Posts: 2,897
Default

just looking at schedule seems maybe to contradict that we have 3rd easiest schedule for remaining seven games.

sometimes win-loss or point differential can give misleading results. how did he decide we had easiest, based on last year?

we play 4 teams with a winning record and 3 with a loosing record

4 winning teams now are @ 11/16Cleveland, 11/23Cincinnatti, @12/14Colts, 12/21Ravens

3 teams with loosing records are @12/7Jaguars, 11/30Titans, and 12/28Jaguars.

So Mallet will face Cleveland, Cincinnatti, Titans , and Jaguars, two away games and two home games. A fair schedule.

Last three games are Colts, Ravens, and Jaguars, one away and two home, also a fair schedule.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:10 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.