IntheBullseye.com  

Go Back   IntheBullseye.com > Hot Reads ...In the Bullseye > The Texans
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old 09-17-2009, 12:05 PM
nunusguy nunusguy is offline
All-Pro
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Houston
Posts: 2,399
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike View Post
Lance Z had some great insight this AM on why we had so many issues Sunday. Part of it was disguising who the Mike LB was, and showing overloads to a different side of the line, causing the protections to slide towards the overload, then bringing the blitzers who were playing games from the other side.
They've already covered some of that in other places, TV spots I've seen this week. The thing is this is nothing new or innovative for a D, certainly not
the 3-4s which are known for these kinds of unconventional schemes.
Jeez, Kubiak has been in this league forever and he has assistants who've been around much longer. Gibbs is a real old-timer. None of that stuff should
surprise or confuse them.
I'm still completed mystified how any team could have caught the Texans offense with theirs pants down on this deal ?
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 09-17-2009, 12:31 PM
mussop mussop is offline
Regular Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: livingston
Posts: 360
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by nunusguy View Post
They've already covered some of that in other places, TV spots I've seen this week. The thing is this is nothing new or innovative for a D, certainly not
the 3-4s which are known for these kinds of unconventional schemes.
Jeez, Kubiak has been in this league forever and he has assistants who've been around much longer. Gibbs is a real old-timer. None of that stuff should
surprise or confuse them.
I'm still completed mystified how any team could have caught the Texans offense with theirs pants down on this deal ?
Mee too! Wish we could catch some teams with some of this trickery.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 09-17-2009, 12:42 PM
Mike Mike is offline
Regular Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 512
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by nunusguy View Post
They've already covered some of that in other places, TV spots I've seen this week. The thing is this is nothing new or innovative for a D, certainly not
the 3-4s which are known for these kinds of unconventional schemes.
Jeez, Kubiak has been in this league forever and he has assistants who've been around much longer. Gibbs is a real old-timer. None of that stuff should
surprise or confuse them.
I'm still completed mystified how any team could have caught the Texans offense with theirs pants down on this deal ?
I'm not saying there is an excuse for what the Texans did. They should have known exactly what was going to happen after what Rex did to them with the Ravens.
__________________
Even though I walk through the valley of the shadow of death, I fear no evil, for You are with me; Your rod and Your staff, they comfort me. PS 23:4
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 09-17-2009, 01:38 PM
Fonz the Boss Fonz the Boss is offline
Regular Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 351
Default

The reason why we cannot blitz as much as the Jets is because we dont have a secondary that can stay on an island playing cover 1 on receivers. Frank Bush tried blitzing Sanchez on almost every third down and you saw what happened. That is why the Richard Smith schemes involved little to no blitzing. He knew he didnt have the defensive personnel for the more complex and exotic blitz packages.
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 09-17-2009, 02:37 PM
papabear papabear is offline
Regular Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Houston
Posts: 838
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fonz the Boss View Post
The reason why we cannot blitz as much as the Jets is because we dont have a secondary that can stay on an island playing cover 1 on receivers. Frank Bush tried blitzing Sanchez on almost every third down and you saw what happened. That is why the Richard Smith schemes involved little to no blitzing. He knew he didnt have the defensive personnel for the more complex and exotic blitz packages.
Richard Smith also showed very little imagination in his blitzes...for the most part if a LB walked up to the line and showed a blitz that's exactly where it was coming from. Not really trying to defend the secondary, because it's a problem too, but the blitzes we bring generally didn't get there either. There's no such thing as a secondary that can maintain coverage if the QB is given enough time. There were a few times when one man got pressure, but because everyone else got stonewalled there was plenty of room for Sanchez to maneuver away from it.
__________________
"Well, at least our players kept their helmets on, so that showed some intelligence"-BobMcNair
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:37 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.