IntheBullseye.com  

Go Back   IntheBullseye.com > Hot Reads ...In the Bullseye > The NFL Draft
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old 04-27-2009, 11:43 PM
dalemurphy dalemurphy is offline
Regular Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 259
Default

I'd be very interested in hearing from someone that really understands X's and O's at the NFL level how specifically Hill solves our issues on the goalline with the SAM LB and how we become less predictable in our one back sets.

I was of the opinion that both Dressen and OD have become fairly accomplished blockers, particularly given how threatening they are as receivers.

I get the basic concept that a good, powerful blocker gives us an advantage but I'm interested in the real detail of it.

thanks.
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 04-28-2009, 12:06 AM
barrett barrett is offline
All-Pro
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 2,902
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dalemurphy View Post
I'd be very interested in hearing from someone that really understands X's and O's at the NFL level how specifically Hill solves our issues on the goalline with the SAM LB and how we become less predictable in our one back sets.

I was of the opinion that both Dressen and OD have become fairly accomplished blockers, particularly given how threatening they are as receivers.

I get the basic concept that a good, powerful blocker gives us an advantage but I'm interested in the real detail of it.

thanks.
On the goalline predictability is less an issue because a TE does not need to be a genuine receiving threat to score a TD on the goalline. The field is so shrunk down that he does not need to run great routes or stretch the field vertically. He just has to block well enough that you can run it in, and catch it if they leave him uncovered on a play action. This is why Vrabel has like 10career TDs. Not because he is a great receiver, but because inside the 5 your 2nd TE is the same Play Action threat regardless of if he's a great pass catcher or not.

So a guy like Hill gives us a great blocker in close but can still catch a 5 yard flip off of play action (the only pass your 2nd TE is catching in the end zone). So despite his lack of versatility, he doesn't make us any more predictable on the goalline. Some teams even go as far as putting the DT at FB down there and it isn't any more predictable because a goalline passing play is never going to have 5 receiving options in the play anyways.

As far as how he helps the running game on the goalline, that is fairly obvious. He blocks better than the guys who did it for us last year (I assume since I've never seen him play). Much of the same holds true in short yardage off of the goalline, but not as much so since there is a bigger field to challenge and defend, and thus you are tipping your hand a bit in those spots.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 04-28-2009, 12:13 AM
dadmg dadmg is offline
Veteran Depth
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Spearfish, SD
Posts: 203
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Roy P View Post

On that same note, I have to believe that DeMeco Ryans and Antoine Caldwell faced off in those Bama practices more than once. It makes sense to go back to the well if you need water, right?
On Caldwell's thread, I posted a quote I got from the Texans website, which I think is appropriate to pop in again here:

Quote:
"DeMeco was a mentor to me when I was at Alabama - kind of took me under his wing - and I’ve always admired the way he works," Caldwell said. "I admire his leadership. And actually to be a part of his team now, I know he’s done a great job out there, so I’m just excited. It’s truly a blessing and I’m looking forward to it."
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 04-28-2009, 07:36 AM
popanot popanot is offline
Pro Bowler
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,916
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dadmg View Post
"DeMeco was a mentor to me when I was at Alabama - kind of took me under his wing - and I’ve always admired the way he works," Caldwell said. "I admire his leadership. And actually to be a part of his team now, I know he’s done a great job out there, so I’m just excited. It’s truly a blessing and I’m looking forward to it."
They have got to get DeMeco's contract done. It's obvious he's a leader and his teammates respect him. I'm almost to the point where I want them to trade DRob (Shelton Brown, maybe?), but I hope they definitely take care of DeMeco.
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 04-28-2009, 11:49 AM
nero THE zero nero THE zero is offline
Regular Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Spring
Posts: 366
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by popanot View Post
They have got to get DeMeco's contract done. It's obvious he's a leader and his teammates respect him. I'm almost to the point where I want them to trade DRob (Shelton Brown, maybe?), but I hope they definitely take care of DeMeco.
I'd like them to trade Dunta too, but I'm starting wonder if we'd get as much for him as we'd like to think.

Ellis Hobbs was just traded for two 5ths. Anthony Henry was traded for a back-up QB.

The market doesn't seem to be as lucrative as we'd like.

I wouldn't personally take anything less than a third for him. Otherwise, I let him walk after '09 and take the compensatory pick in '11.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:42 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.