IntheBullseye.com  

Go Back   IntheBullseye.com > Hot Reads ...In the Bullseye > The Texans
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old 09-08-2015, 03:04 PM
Arky Arky is offline
Hall of Fame
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 9,291
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Arky View Post
..........4. The Hard Knocks factor. These guys got excellent exposure to the other 31 teams which allowed them to be showcased league wide. Along with James, Nix and Brown who cut bait, I think EZ is now on the Dolphin PS. So, that's (at least) four who migrated to another team which has to be a Texans record....
I forgot about Ferentz (Broncos) so that's 5 migrations. I was actually somewhat pleased to see him (Ferentz) go - letting him hang around always smelled of "buddy move" to me...
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 09-08-2015, 03:10 PM
barrett barrett is offline
All-Pro
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 2,902
Default

James signed with the Ravens. The DBs ahead of him there have major injury history increasing his chances of making the 53. These guys who are trying to catch on a roster will do anything to make it. They don't care if coach is nice, they care if they make the NFL.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 09-08-2015, 03:15 PM
WMH WMH is offline
Pro Bowler
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,795
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Arky View Post

4. The Hard Knocks factor. These guys got excellent exposure to the other 31 teams which allowed them to be showcased league wide. Along with James, Nix and Brown who cut bait, I think EZ is now on the Dolphin PS. So, that's (at least) four who migrated to another team which has to be a Texans record....
Nix and Brown were claimed thru waivers. They didn't have much choice.

James probably saw the depth in Bmore vs Houston, and figured he'd have a better chance to get a game check with them. EZ as well.
__________________
In B'OB we trust, until he pisses us off!
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 09-08-2015, 03:22 PM
Arky Arky is offline
Hall of Fame
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 9,291
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by WMH View Post
Nix and Brown were claimed thru waivers. They didn't have much choice.

James probably saw the depth in Bmore vs Houston, and figured he'd have a better chance to get a game check with them. EZ as well.
Doh! You're right. I believe Ferentz was also waiver wire....

Still, I can't recall a year where Texans have been "raided" so much... mostly due to Hard Knocks, I suspect...
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 09-08-2015, 03:39 PM
chuck chuck is offline
All-Pro
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,845
Default

The idea that the Texans coaches are difficult is absurd to me. Other than Seattle every other team in the league has coaches that are verbally extremely demanding, who get in your face, yell, curse, etc. Even palm licker was and is like that away from the cameras.

So if players don't like being coached they can go to Seattle and participate in meditation sessions or they can play croquet on the lawn of an old folks' home.

Losing pretty good players that our guys have cut is surely a sign that the Texans are turning the corner in terms of talent. We still need a quarterback and the OL depth is bad but we're getting to the point where most of the Texans starters would start for any good team.
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 09-08-2015, 03:49 PM
WMH WMH is offline
Pro Bowler
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,795
Default

FWIW -
Field Yates ‏@FieldYates 5m5 minutes ago
Source: DT Louis Nix failed his physical with the Giants. He goes back to the waiver system.
__________________
In B'OB we trust, until he pisses us off!
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 09-08-2015, 04:27 PM
chuck chuck is offline
All-Pro
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,845
Default

What a joke that guy is. Imagine having NFL talent but being far too stupid to do anything with it.

I wonder who among the Texans wanted that loser. The more I see of Rick Smith the more I realize he's just a guy who sits in an office and looks out the window. I don't see him deciding what color Kool-Aid he wants with his lunch much less anything having to do with real football decisions.
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 09-08-2015, 05:25 PM
Arky Arky is offline
Hall of Fame
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 9,291
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by chuck View Post
The idea that the Texans coaches are difficult is absurd to me. Other than Seattle every other team in the league has coaches that are verbally extremely demanding, who get in your face, yell, curse, etc. Even palm licker was and is like that away from the cameras.

So if players don't like being coached they can go to Seattle and participate in meditation sessions or they can play croquet on the lawn of an old folks' home.
You have a point - especially with the younger players. When Vrabel says, "Get off the field, Trail", he's being pretty harsh on the young guy... Perhaps Mr. Trail is not doing his job correctly and Vrabel is tired of putting it up with it. OTOH, how do you think "Get off the field, Cushing" would fly with Brian Cushing? Coaches should be allowed to coach (with passion) but there will always be "good coaches" and "bad coaches" (yes, even at the pro level)....

As an aside, I quit my last real job after 6 months because I had a gung-ho boss (actually he wasn't a "boss" more like a group leader) some 15 years my junior. I'd come to work, do my job and, IMO, be productive yet he always found a reason to "push" me. Just never pleased. Not his fault, I suppose, he was wired that way. I had come from a laid-back corporate environment where I was given the latitude to work on my own and was quite productive....It was a professional atmosphere, IMO, encouraging what-can-you-do-to-help.. So, working for said boss was like getting kicked back to being a no-nothing 18 year old just starting out in the real world. So I quit, left the job.... told his boss I can't work with him. Been self-employed and loving life ever since... So, I would encourage anybody employed in a less than satisfying environment to GTFO and find something else...

Quote:

Losing pretty good players that our guys have cut is surely a sign that the Texans are turning the corner in terms of talent........
Woah, that sounds almost like an indirect compliment to the Texans organization? You feeling OK, chuck?
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 09-08-2015, 08:50 PM
HPF Bob HPF Bob is offline
All-Pro
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 4,149
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by WMH View Post
FWIW -
Field Yates ‏@FieldYates 5m5 minutes ago
Source: DT Louis Nix failed his physical with the Giants. He goes back to the waiver system.
He sprained his gut eating mo chicken.
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 10-13-2015, 01:14 PM
WMH WMH is offline
Pro Bowler
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,795
Default

Aaron Wilson ‏@AaronWilson_NFL 1m1 minute ago
Texans signed DT Brandon Dunn to active roster off Bears' practice squad, per source
__________________
In B'OB we trust, until he pisses us off!
Reply With Quote
  #31  
Old 10-13-2015, 02:58 PM
popanot popanot is offline
Pro Bowler
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,916
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by WMH View Post
Aaron Wilson ‏@AaronWilson_NFL 1m1 minute ago
Texans signed DT Brandon Dunn to active roster off Bears' practice squad, per source
Someone hurt of ineffectiveness? I'm actually surprised we're not raiding more practice squad's with the lack of overall talent and depth this team has. WTH, I can't imagine our 40th best player on down is any better than taking a flyer on a PS player.
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 10-13-2015, 03:25 PM
WMH WMH is offline
Pro Bowler
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,795
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by popanot View Post
Someone hurt of ineffectiveness? I'm actually surprised we're not raiding more practice squad's with the lack of overall talent and depth this team has. WTH, I can't imagine our 40th best player on down is any better than taking a flyer on a PS player.
Saw where Crick pulled up lame on Monday, but that's a DE spot, not DT/NT. The Wilfork experiment hasn't exactly yielded the results we had hoped, that's for sure.

Saw this a few minutes ago, guess that means Washington/Shorts are getting in better shape:

Daniel Gotera ‏@DTGoteraKHOU 5m5 minutes ago
#Texans have waived WR Chandler Worthy
__________________
In B'OB we trust, until he pisses us off!
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 10-13-2015, 03:29 PM
barrett barrett is offline
All-Pro
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 2,902
Default

The same Worthy who played ahead of Strong.

I don't think the bottom of our roster is actually worse than most teams. Many of our cuts found homes other places. This isn't surprising since we actually do very well in rounds 6-7 and UDFA. But we are terrible in rounds 2-4 and I think that shows up more in how bad our roster is from spots 10-40.
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 10-13-2015, 09:46 PM
HPF Bob HPF Bob is offline
All-Pro
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 4,149
Default

We aren't worthy...
We aren't worthy...
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 10-14-2015, 07:49 AM
WMH WMH is offline
Pro Bowler
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,795
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by barrett View Post
The same Worthy who played ahead of Strong.
Different spots, and return ability (allegedly), but still a bad look for Strong.

FWIW - They did resign Worthy to the PS.

Aaron Wilson ‏@AaronWilson_NFL 3m3 minutes ago
Texans cut rookie Chandler Worthy from active roster, to rejoin practice squad http://blog.chron.com/ultimatetexans...andler-worthy/
__________________
In B'OB we trust, until he pisses us off!
Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old 10-14-2015, 10:09 AM
barrett barrett is offline
All-Pro
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 2,902
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by WMH View Post
Different spots, and return ability (allegedly), but still a bad look for Strong.

FWIW - They did resign Worthy to the PS.

Aaron Wilson ‏@AaronWilson_NFL 3m3 minutes ago
Texans cut rookie Chandler Worthy from active roster, to rejoin practice squad http://blog.chron.com/ultimatetexans...andler-worthy/
I think it's more a bad look for O'Brien. We played a guy that 32 NFL teams passed on after we waived him ahead of the guy who caught 2 TDs in his first NFL game.

As for return ablility, nobody on our team has shown any.
Reply With Quote
  #37  
Old 10-14-2015, 10:43 AM
nunusguy nunusguy is offline
All-Pro
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Houston
Posts: 2,399
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by barrett View Post
I think it's more a bad look for O'Brien. We played a guy that 32 NFL teams passed on after we waived him ahead of the guy who caught 2 TDs in his first NFL game.
O'Brien has had lots of bad looks lately. For instance, unless he's intentionally trying to undermine the confidence and performance of his QBs, I have no idea what his thinking process is at that position ?
Reply With Quote
  #38  
Old 10-14-2015, 11:51 AM
chuck chuck is offline
All-Pro
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,845
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by barrett View Post
As for return ability, nobody on our team has shown any.
They would be better off rushing the punter with 11 guys and hoping for the best. The only thing that ever happens on a return is a block in the back penalty which you can avoid entirely with the chuck system. I'll take my chances on the bounce of the football.
Reply With Quote
  #39  
Old 10-15-2015, 02:07 PM
painekiller painekiller is offline
All-Pro
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Near the Galleria
Posts: 2,852
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by chuck View Post
They would be better off rushing the punter with 11 guys and hoping for the best. The only thing that ever happens on a return is a block in the back penalty which you can avoid entirely with the chuck system. I'll take my chances on the bounce of the football.
Sadly, I think you have a point here.
__________________
There is no failure, only feedback.
Reply With Quote
  #40  
Old 10-15-2015, 08:46 PM
chuck chuck is offline
All-Pro
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,845
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by painekiller View Post
Sadly, I think you have a point here.
I am, as usual, sort of acting like an idiot. But at the same time I am absolutely certain that with the chuck formation the opposition's net punting average would decrease.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:37 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.