IntheBullseye.com  

Go Back   IntheBullseye.com > Hot Reads ...In the Bullseye > The Texans

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-27-2015, 11:56 AM
HPF Bob HPF Bob is offline
All-Pro
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 4,149
Default The J.J. Watt Conundrum

How did the group that whiffed on Amobi Okoye and Louis Nix get J.J. Watt so right in 2011 with the #11 overall pick?

One of those random thoughts that pop up while in the shower. While he did not win the MVP last season, he was arguably the best player in the NFL last year and we didn't have to trade up or sell the farm to get him.

If you look at the 2011 draft, the first 10 picks, other than the QBs, weren't all that bad:

1. Cam Newton QB
2. Von Miller OLB
3. Marcel Dareus, DT
4. A.J. Green, WR
5. Patrick Peterson, CB-KR
6. Julio Jones, WR
7. Aldon Smith, DE
8. Jake Locker, QB
9. Tyron Smith, OL
10. Blaine Gabbert, QB

Other than Locker and Gabbert, you can't say any were busts. If the 9ers had no idea Smith was bipolar, that could be excused as well.

The talk in Houston that spring was drafting Robert Quinn whom the Rams took a couple of picks later and hasn't played poorly.

So were the Texans' FO "blind squirrels" that year or did they have some real insight on how great Watt could be?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-27-2015, 12:15 PM
chuck chuck is offline
All-Pro
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,845
Default

How could anyone possibly know that JJ Watt would work himself into being the best player in the league? Even a competent front office could not have chosen Watt imagining that outcome.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-27-2015, 12:54 PM
Warren Warren is offline
Regular Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 623
Default

Rick Smith has said that they had a deal in place with the 49ers to move up to #7 if Patrick Peterson slipped that far. So obviously they wanted Peterson more. They clearly liked JJ and maybe they saw some things in him that other teams didn't, but if they had strong feelings that he'd become the player that he has they would've been trying to trade up to get him.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 04-27-2015, 01:58 PM
popanot popanot is offline
Pro Bowler
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,916
Default

I'm inclined to give Smith and company credit for identifying and drafting JJ, but then I look at the rest of the 2011 draft and think they merely lucked out and caught lightning in a bottle.

http://www.drafthistory.com/index.php/teams/texans
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 04-27-2015, 03:07 PM
WMH WMH is offline
Pro Bowler
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,795
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by popanot View Post
I'm inclined to give Smith and company credit for identifying and drafting JJ, but then I look at the rest of the 2011 draft and think they merely lucked out and caught lightning in a bottle.

http://www.drafthistory.com/index.php/teams/texans
3 starters out of the '11 draft. That's not too shabby in my eyes.

ESPN had an article about how well the Texans have drafted. Most of us will roll the eyes and disagree, but stats are stats.
http://espn.go.com/blog/houston-texa...for-most-teams

"With the help of ESPN Stats & Info, our Kevin Seifert examined how many players on each team's roster were drafted by that team. Only five teams have more -- the Bengals, Packers, Vikings, Patriots and 49ers. Twenty-eight members of the Texans' roster were drafted by the team."

I'm of the opinion that all GM's are blind squirrels to some degree, as is everyone that is in a hiring position. Sometimes you win, sometimes you lose. It happens. With the amount of time, effort, and money they put into this stuff you'd think they'd be more accurate, but none of them are. More hits than misses is the key to keeping your job as a GM.

Or, in Smith's case, having some sort of dirty laundry on the McNair's.......
__________________
In B'OB we trust, until he pisses us off!
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 04-27-2015, 05:37 PM
barrett barrett is offline
All-Pro
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 2,902
Default

It's not the same group as Nix and Okoye. Wade Phillips was on board for Watt, along with dozens of other coaching/FO changes. The only constant is Smith. The draft is clearly a group process in Houston and 3 different groups drafted those 3 players. And though nobody realistically thought they were drafting the best defensive player of a generation, everyone involved gets a ton of credit.

And even though nobody could have predicted it at draft time, Wade did say JJ was going to the HOF after his 5 sack rookie year. http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com...ed-for-canton/

Wade is clearly a guy who knows NFL defense.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 04-27-2015, 07:08 PM
HPF Bob HPF Bob is offline
All-Pro
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 4,149
Default

I couldn't recall if Wade Phillips was here for the 2011 draft so I stayed clear of the subject. Different d-coords in those three examples, true. I don't want to call Clowney a bust but I wonder if that will someday be looked upon like the Raiders and JaMarcus Russell if he fails to produce.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 04-27-2015, 10:02 PM
chuck chuck is offline
All-Pro
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,845
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by WMH View Post
3 starters out of the '11 draft. That's not too shabby in my eyes.
Well, they ended up with two impact players which is the only time that has happened since 2006 so one does have reason to celebrate.

But in general looking over the team's draft history depresses me profoundly and I always end up wondering how they have ever had a winning season.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 04-27-2015, 10:39 PM
Arky Arky is offline
Hall of Fame
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 9,291
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by HPF Bob View Post
I couldn't recall if Wade Phillips was here for the 2011 draft so I stayed clear of the subject. Different d-coords in those three examples, true. I don't want to call Clowney a bust but I wonder if that will someday be looked upon like the Raiders and JaMarcus Russell if he fails to produce.
I don't think so. JaMarcus Russell turned out to be a slacker. If Clowney fails to live up to his selection, it will be because the injuries and repairs got the best of him.....
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 04-28-2015, 01:48 AM
Nconroe Nconroe is offline
All-Pro
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Lake Conroe
Posts: 2,897
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by WMH View Post
3 starters out of the '11 draft. That's not too shabby in my eyes.

ESPN had an article about how well the Texans have drafted. Most of us will roll the eyes and disagree, but stats are stats.
http://espn.go.com/blog/houston-texa...for-most-teams

"With the help of ESPN Stats & Info, our Kevin Seifert examined how many players on each team's roster were drafted by that team. Only five teams have more -- the Bengals, Packers, Vikings, Patriots and 49ers. Twenty-eight members of the Texans' roster were drafted by the team."

I'm of the opinion that all GM's are blind squirrels to some degree, as is everyone that is in a hiring position. Sometimes you win, sometimes you lose. It happens. With the amount of time, effort, and money they put into this stuff you'd think they'd be more accurate, but none of them are. More hits than misses is the key to keeping your job as a GM.

Or, in Smith's case, having some sort of dirty laundry on the McNair's.......
I agree, we are building our team thru draft better than most teams. Which means most teams draft even worse than texans.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:39 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.