IntheBullseye.com  

Go Back   IntheBullseye.com > Hot Reads ...In the Bullseye > The Texans

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-24-2008, 09:45 AM
mussop mussop is offline
Regular Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: livingston
Posts: 360
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by KJ3 View Post
now that all the facts are out are you still blaming me for the texans wanting zero part of brett favre? either you're bringing up old topics to keep a stupid argument going or you're jealous that somehow i was able to gather that favre was a detriment to our team.
So now who would you rather have?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-24-2008, 10:21 AM
barrett barrett is offline
All-Pro
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 2,902
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mussop View Post
So now who would you rather have?
not brett favre. We already have a cheaper version to throw multiple interceptions for us.

Now if you are asking what defense and running game I'd rather have I would say the Jets. Or if you are asking whose schedule I'd rather have, I'd say the Jets. But I still wouldn't touch Brett Favre and his league leading INT total.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-24-2008, 04:05 PM
coloradodude coloradodude is offline
Regular Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 255
Default

The question remains though, would the Jets be 8 and 3 right now if they had Schaub? Rosenburp?

Nope.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-24-2008, 06:30 PM
popanot popanot is offline
Pro Bowler
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,916
Default

Favre - 20TDs / 13Ints.

Our QBs - 15TDs / 17Ints.

Yeah, I hate it when your QB has more TDs than INTs.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-24-2008, 06:38 PM
mussop mussop is offline
Regular Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: livingston
Posts: 360
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by popanot View Post
Favre - 20TDs / 13Ints.

Our QBs - 15TDs / 17Ints.

Yeah, I hate it when your QB has more TDs than INTs.
You left out games missed. 0!
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-24-2008, 06:45 PM
barrett barrett is offline
All-Pro
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 2,902
Default

the guy leads the NFL in INTS and we have people lamenting the fact we didn't sign him. Probably the same people who chanted We Want Sage at the dolphins game.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 11-24-2008, 07:07 PM
mussop mussop is offline
Regular Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: livingston
Posts: 360
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by barrett View Post
the guy leads the NFL in INTS and we have people lamenting the fact we didn't sign him. Probably the same people who chanted We Want Sage at the dolphins game.
He also leads the #2 scoring offense (25th last year) in the leauge, hasnt missed a game this year and is leading his team to a playoff berth. Yeh what a looser huh? Wish our QB was that big of a looser.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 11-25-2008, 06:15 AM
popanot popanot is offline
Pro Bowler
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,916
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by barrett View Post
the guy leads the NFL in INTS and we have people lamenting the fact we didn't sign him. Probably the same people who chanted We Want Sage at the dolphins game.
I'll agree with you this wouldn't be the best place or fit for Favre, nor have I ever stated that I wanted him here (and wanting Sage is laughable). I just think the INT argument against Favre doesn't hold much weight. So what if he leads the league in INTs? He has more TDs than INTs, he's tough as hell, knows how to lead, and his teams win. We could only be so lucky to have those sort of tangibles or qualities at QB.

Last edited by popanot; 11-25-2008 at 06:27 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 11-25-2008, 07:42 AM
KJ3 KJ3 is offline
Regular Starter
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: h-town baby!
Posts: 563
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mussop View Post
So now who would you rather have?
drew brees
__________________
Cowher Power 2011!!!!!!!!!!!!
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 01-01-2009, 12:57 PM
barrett barrett is offline
All-Pro
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 2,902
Default

I notice Mussop had nothing to say.

Luckily a few of Favre's teammates did. Maybe we can take theirs as the final word for whether Favre would have been a good pick-up for us this year.

From Thomas Jones - "The other day, the three interceptions really hurt us. I mean, that's just reality," Jones told the radio station. "If I were to sit here and say, 'Oh, man, it's OK,' that's not reality. ... I don't like it, I know everybody else on the team doesn't like it. You're jeopardizing the whole team because you're having a bad day. To me, that's not fair to everybody else. You're not the only one on the team. So when you get to the wire and somebody is just giving the game up, I mean, it's just not [fair]."

...

A veteran Jets player, quoted anonymously by Newsday, described Favre as a "distant" teammate who, when at the Jets' practice facility, spent his down time away from teammates in an office specially designated for him. "There was a lot of resentment in the room about him. He never socialized with us, never went to dinner with anyone."


Sounds like our front office was smart to stay well away from Favre, especially if they wanted to keep their job.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 12-28-2008, 07:03 PM
barrett barrett is offline
All-Pro
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 2,902
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mussop View Post
So now who would you rather have?

So I noticed you dug up this old thread after months of silence back in November. Any reason you didn't dig it up again lately?

Perhaps...
-(NFL leading 22 ints),
-Missed zero games (you were big on that) but has a 38 year old shoulder that gave out half way through the season leading to an epic collapse with the NFL's easiest schedule (2 TD and 9 INT in the last 5 games).
-Enough Pick 6's this year to start at QB for LSU
-probably got his coach fired and made Jets fans miss Chad Pennington
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 12-28-2008, 09:26 PM
Bigtinylittle Bigtinylittle is offline
Regular Starter
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 262
Default

I guess It's easy to fall in love with an older player based on what they've done before. We did it with Colvin, Molden, and Green. I'm glad we didn't do it with Favre. It made no sense. Schaub is pleanty good enough to take us a long way if we surround him with more good players. And his best years should still be ahead of him.
By the way, if Favre retires now, how do the Jets know he really means it?
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:14 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.