OTAs

[barrett]

Originally Posted by HPF Bob

All these glowing words about the wide receivers and I ask (again) "Gee maybe we didn't need to spend two of our first three choices on wide receivers."

I agree Bob. The good report from Texans.com OTA proves we didn't need WRs.

I found some other great nuggets from the first day of OTAs

http://www.houstontexans.com/news/ar...6-002732075947

Louis Nix looked great, Clowney is set to dominate, Feidoriwitz looked good, the QBs are the best ever in Houston, and ***the WRs look great***

Obviously that was from last year Bob. The OTA reports always look great no matter how bad the players are. You can continue your stance about not needing WRs, but don't pretend that OTAs are proof of anything either way.