![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
__________________
There is no failure, only feedback. |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
I'm guessing it's Paxton Lynch if available or Connor Cook. We shall see.
__________________
Originally Posted by chuck I'm just sitting here thinking (pacing, actually) that whatever my issues with Kubiak he is apparently a goddam genius at tutoring quarterbacks. |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
On another note, the team's second and third round picks are usually a shitshow so as far as I'm concerned if the team grabs a dude named Pharoah and then another dude named Scooby I'm going to have to call that a win. |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
What if they use #22 on Hack?
![]() That would certainly stir things up...... What if that was OB's plan all along? Use schmucks for 2 years until Hackenberg came out... Not sure I would like it but it would certainly put OB in a make or break situation... |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Maybe Hackenberg stunk it up for 2 years just in case the Texans didn't have the #1 overall pick so he could ensure that he could be reunited with OB.
__________________
Originally Posted by chuck I'm just sitting here thinking (pacing, actually) that whatever my issues with Kubiak he is apparently a goddam genius at tutoring quarterbacks. |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
IMO the downside is not that severe when and if missing with the 22nd pick in the Draft. Now if they were to use that pick, along with the second and/or third round pick, and our future first round from the 2017 Draft to move up for a QB, that move has a very steep downside if the QB were to crash&burn. But for the the 22nd Draft pick alone, they should use it on Hack if they like him even if they have him rated as only a second-round value.
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|