IntheBullseye.com  

Go Back   IntheBullseye.com > Hot Reads ...In the Bullseye > The Texans

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-24-2011, 01:09 PM
popanot popanot is offline
Pro Bowler
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,916
Default

TJ's inexperience and ability (or lack thereof) is showing through and definitely a main factor, but the current problems with this offense go way beyond him at this point. The starting WRs on this team right now (not including AJ, of course) would be WR 3 or 4 or non-starters on most teams. You can give all the kudos you want to Walter for his blocking, but his WR skills are average at best and it doesn't help the rookie QB. I'm not even going to bring up JJ because all know what a slug WR he is. But in addition to that, at least in the Colts game, Caldwell and Winston were downright awful and TJ didn't have any time in the pocket when he took and normal 3-5 step drop. Again, it is what it with TJ. He's a rookie for crying out loud so what did people expect? What I'm saying is it's not only him and this team has far deeper issues.

It's hogwash to say the D wasn't a factor in that loss. The Colts drove up and down the field the whole game - they just couldn't put it in the end zone. In addition, the Texans offense had a 5min+ drive before the last Colts drive, so they had plenty of time to catch their breath. They choked it just as much as the offense.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-24-2011, 01:20 PM
chuck chuck is offline
All-Pro
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,845
Default

I would like to see TJ play four or five games with AJ (or ten or twelve) before I declare him unable to play in the league. He is not a plus athlete but he's far from laughable. I don't consider him particularly inaccurate. He's a woefully unprepared rookie thrust into a high pressure situation. Quarterback is by far the most difficult position in the NFL, maybe in all sports. Just look around. There are 32 teams and about 8 quarterbacks that look like they have any business being out there at all.

I'm certainly not saying that TJ has been good; he hasn't. But I'm not at all ready to assert that he can't play in the league.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-24-2011, 01:25 PM
barrett barrett is offline
All-Pro
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 2,902
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by chuck View Post
I would like to see TJ play four or five games with AJ (or ten or twelve) before I declare him unable to play in the league. He is not a plus athlete but he's far from laughable. I don't consider him particularly inaccurate. He's a woefully unprepared rookie thrust into a high pressure situation. Quarterback is by far the most difficult position in the NFL, maybe in all sports. Just look around. There are 32 teams and about 8 quarterbacks that look like they have any business being out there at all.

I'm certainly not saying that TJ has been good; he hasn't. But I'm not at all ready to assert that he can't play in the league.
I also will not say he cannot play in the NFL. He has had way too much to ovecome for any long term judgement to be made here. But we honestly don't need a long term judgment about the guy. He is not a long term option for us. Schaub is the QB going forward and Yates is not the guy to change that. What we need is a short term answer and we don't have one. We have a guy who is not ready to play QB in the NFL.

I sincerely hope Schaub is replaced (though I bet we "stay the course") but only if it is a chance at a real upgrade. Spend a 1st round pick on a guy you love who has all the tools Schaub doesn't. Don't try to sell a guy who has a chance to become Matt Schaub in 3 years if everything falls just right for him.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-24-2011, 01:41 PM
Big Texas Big Texas is offline
Pro Bowler
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,469
Default

I understand completely what you are saying Barrett. You are right to be skeptical of TJ. However, I just can't share your sentiment because the guy has not been given a fair shot.

As has been mentioned over and over again, our receiving core sucks. On top of that he has had lttle time to prepare. He was thrown into this job and asked to learn an offense that took Shaub 4 years.

Maybe I just like to look for potential, but I saw some good things from this guy. When he gets the chance he throws a better deep ball than Shaub and he is more athletic than Shaub. He is still learning. Just like Shaub was doing. The only bad thing I have seen from TJ is his tendency to throw the medium pass high at times.

Concerning the playaction pass, most of the time the deep guy (Jacoby) is not even looking for the ball.

Overall, I am not going to say a guy sucks after 4 games, minimal practice reps, and no training camp.

One final note, its not like Shaub has been the most accurate QB. He has been known on multiple occasions to make the dumb ass pass.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-24-2011, 02:16 PM
barrett barrett is offline
All-Pro
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 2,902
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Big Texas View Post
I understand completely what you are saying Barrett. You are right to be skeptical of TJ. However, I just can't share your sentiment because the guy has not been given a fair shot.

As has been mentioned over and over again, our receiving core sucks. On top of that he has had lttle time to prepare. He was thrown into this job and asked to learn an offense that took Shaub 4 years.

Maybe I just like to look for potential, but I saw some good things from this guy. When he gets the chance he throws a better deep ball than Shaub and he is more athletic than Shaub. He is still learning. Just like Shaub was doing. The only bad thing I have seen from TJ is his tendency to throw the medium pass high at times.

Concerning the playaction pass, most of the time the deep guy (Jacoby) is not even looking for the ball.

Overall, I am not going to say a guy sucks after 4 games, minimal practice reps, and no training camp.

One final note, its not like Shaub has been the most accurate QB. He has been known on multiple occasions to make the dumb ass pass.
I get what you are saying, I just don't think it is particularly relevant. Yates isn't auditioning for a starting job in the future. I highly doubt he is ever given real consideration for that role. If I am ever wrong I will evaluate him on what he becomes.

But circumstances have given him the job right now and for however long our season lasts. It really doesn't matter what level of preparation he has or what is around him. He has what he has. He can only be evaluated for the job he currently has, and he stinks at that job. No amount of daydreaming over whether he can one day be better than Matt Schaub in the right circumstances changes the fact that he stinks right now. I don't blame him for it at all, and I don't think anyone else in his shoes would be any better, but it is what it is. The end of our football season.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 12-24-2011, 06:06 PM
Nconroe Nconroe is offline
All-Pro
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Lake Conroe
Posts: 2,897
Default

It is what it is for sure.

But I choose to hope our season isn't over with one and done in playoffs.


Perhaps the checkdowns are partially due to Yates having a sore shoulder which will get better in next 10 days?

Perhaps getting AJ back will stabalize offense a little.

Perhaps with Wade back Defense can get more turnovers and sacks.

Just hope however we won over Atlanta and Cincinnatti can happen a little more.

Maybe I'm just dreaming, optimistic against the odds.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 12-24-2011, 08:10 PM
barrett barrett is offline
All-Pro
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 2,902
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nconroe View Post
It is what it is for sure.

But I choose to hope our season isn't over with one and done in playoffs.


Perhaps the checkdowns are partially due to Yates having a sore shoulder which will get better in next 10 days?

Perhaps getting AJ back will stabalize offense a little.

Perhaps with Wade back Defense can get more turnovers and sacks.

Just hope however we won over Atlanta and Cincinnatti can happen a little more.

Maybe I'm just dreaming, optimistic against the odds.
I think we can win a low scoring game and some of the reasons I think that are the ones you mentioned (I think Yates is hurt, I think he is overwhelmed and 10 days might help, AJ is a huge help who makes every QB better, and Wade will be welcomed as a stabilizing factor all-around for what must be a damaged psyche and confidence right now).

I definitely believe we can be in a 1 score game just like Indy, ATL, Cincy because I think our running game and defense will keep us competitive in almost any situation. I'm just not real positive about our ability to win four close ones in a row with a neutered offense.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 12-24-2011, 01:20 PM
barrett barrett is offline
All-Pro
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 2,902
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by popanot View Post
TJ's inexperience and ability (or lack thereof) is showing through and definitely a main factor, but the current problems with this offense go way beyond him at this point. The starting WRs on this team right now (not including AJ, of course) would be WR 3 or 4 or non-starters on most teams. You can give all the kudos you want to Walter for his blocking, but his WR skills are average at best and it doesn't help the rookie QB. I'm not even going to bring up JJ because all know what a slug WR he is. But in addition to that, at least in the Colts game, Caldwell and Winston were downright awful and TJ didn't have any time in the pocket when he took and normal 3-5 step drop. Again, it is what it with TJ. He's a rookie for crying out loud so what did people expect? What I'm saying is it's not only him and this team has far deeper issues.

It's hogwash to say the D wasn't a factor in that loss. The Colts drove up and down the field the whole game - they just couldn't put it in the end zone. In addition, the Texans offense had a 5min+ drive before the last Colts drive, so they had plenty of time to catch their breath. They choked it just as much as the offense.
We ran for 170+ and gave up 19 points. The Defense also gift wrapped the offense a TD and let them play the entire game with a lead. Yates had more than enough help. The problem was his ONLY 3rd down conversion of the game was in the 4th quarter on a ball thrown 3 feet behind his WR that was then caught off a defenders back. He simply cannot put the ball where he wants to and the Colts made him.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 12-26-2011, 10:53 AM
popanot popanot is offline
Pro Bowler
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,916
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by barrett View Post
We ran for 170+ and gave up 19 points. The Defense also gift wrapped the offense a TD and let them play the entire game with a lead. Yates had more than enough help. The problem was his ONLY 3rd down conversion of the game was in the 4th quarter on a ball thrown 3 feet behind his WR that was then caught off a defenders back. He simply cannot put the ball where he wants to and the Colts made him.
Yes the running game and Watt were off the charts. But IMO, the OL pass protection (and again the right side in particular) was atrocious and made it virtually impossible for Yates to take a normal 3-5 step drop in the pocket. They had no choice but to run the PA rollouts. As for the WRs going deep and giving Yates an option on those plays, again, the replays I saw the WR either never turned around like they were an option or they had a defender right next to them. This all goes back to my comment that our WRs are below average and can't get separation.

As for the D, yes, they got that 1 turnover in the beginning of the game. But other than Watt playing lights-out, they didn't disrupt the Colts offense nor did they stop the Colts when they needed to. With the us in lead, they gave up a game winning TD to a 1 win with barely over 1 minute to play with no timeouts. And that was after a 5 mintue drive by our offense where they had plenty of rest. That's "helping" the team to win? Pretty much sealed the loss from what I saw. The 19 points the Colts scored were just much them stopping themselves (as well as a missed FG) than our D making game winning plays.

Blame it on TJ all you want, and he certainly had a big part in that loss, but not placing some of the blame on the OL, WRs, the D and the coaching staff is being shortsighted and giving them way too much credit.

EDIT: And don't get me wrong... I'm not saying TJ is great and certainly not saying he's better than Schaub or there should be a QB competition next year. He's certainly knocked Lienart out of a job, but no way is he a better option than Schaub. All I'm saying is the whole team for the most part is playing like crap and there's plenty of blame to go around - not only on the QB. Schaub was probably good enough to overcome some of these weak performances, but a backup rookie QB is not and everyone has to step up their game or they won't win another game this season.

Last edited by popanot; 12-26-2011 at 11:21 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 12-26-2011, 04:21 PM
barrett barrett is offline
All-Pro
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 2,902
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by popanot View Post
EDIT: And don't get me wrong... I'm not saying TJ is great and certainly not saying he's better than Schaub or there should be a QB competition next year. He's certainly knocked Lienart out of a job, but no way is he a better option than Schaub. All I'm saying is the whole team for the most part is playing like crap and there's plenty of blame to go around - not only on the QB. Schaub was probably good enough to overcome some of these weak performances, but a backup rookie QB is not and everyone has to step up their game or they won't win another game this season.
I agree with all of this. We played well enough to win if we got good QB play. With the QB play we are getting we need to be better than average and cannot give away opportunites anywhere. The team laid it's 2nd consecutive egg and will lay two more if they don't change something.

And I am very grateful Yates has been just good enough to keep me hopeful before the games and bitter afterwards. But I don't think the last two games were better than Leinhart would have done. Yates has started checking the ball down (perhaps as a reaction to the turnovers?). We would have gotten that with more rhythm and less mistakes out of Leinhart.

Either Yates is hurt, or teams are adjusting after getting film on him, or something else. But the same guys who aren't that good when Schaub played (or in the Cincy game), are running downfield routes and Yates isn't throwing it to them anymore. I don't buy he's being told to do that, because his turnover issues did not come on downfield throws. He simply looks indecisive and weaker armed the last two weeks, and it is getting worse not better.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:46 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.