If you could change one thing about the draft.....

[painekiller]

I did not put out a version of my cherry pick for a good reason, Rick Smith did a pretty dang good job with draft.

So instead of dissecting Smith's draft, I decided for me the best thing was to look forward to how these guys and the new defensive coordinator change the 2009 Texans. I'm am not going to cry about the ones that got away this time.

And for me that is a new leaf.

[Roy P]

Originally Posted by painekiller

I'm am not going to cry about the ones that got away this time.

And for me that is a new leaf.

I didn't want to, but HE asked.

[Blitzwood]

Originally Posted by painekiller

I did not put out a version of my cherry pick for a good reason, Rick Smith did a pretty dang good job with draft.

So instead of dissecting Smith's draft, I decided for me the best thing was to look forward to how these guys and the new defensive coordinator change the 2009 Texans. I'm am not going to cry about the ones that got away this time.

And for me that is a new leaf.

pk, this is simply a voluntary exercise of ONE thing you would change, nothing else. I'm not dissecting anyone's draft, just clarifying NOW what one thing anyone would do different, if anything at all, on the record.

I did this because there might be some folks that will come on here mid season and say,"we should have taken Matthews in the first like I wanted" with all their hindsight on display. IMO, If there are any reservations, let's hear them now.

[Bigtinylittle]

All the picks were at positions of need. Moreover, we have a very specialized run offense that requires enough speed to run the stretch play.

Having a guy who can't do that and keeping him on the 45 man active roster every week just to run a couple of plays doesn't sound like a good use of a draft pick. Im not in the group who say we've got to have a big back to be sucessful.

So right now, I have no criticisms of the Texans draft. I'm sure that not all
the players will be a sucess, though. They never are.

[nunusguy]

I think Barwin is atleast as risky as Cushing if not more so, but I think people accept that and kinda realize its something we have to accept because its so important to improve our pass-rush even if we have to use a second round pick on a situational player.
The problem with Cushing for me is that he may not be as much of an upgrade over Diles at SAM as Caldwell ultimately will be at center (or RG). That's not a favorable return-on-investment for first-round cap vs 3rd-round picks in terms of cap resources. And its really gonna be a bummer if Cushing can't stay on the field on third-downs as some say ?
So if given the choice I would have taken the Texans top-rated DB on thier Board for the #1 pick and got the SAM in a later round.

[HPF Bob]

I suppose I was relieved that we didn't use our first-rounder on a "situational" player like some wanted with Everette Brown. To me, Barwin is an acceptable risk *because* we waited until the second round to take him. I'm not sure I understand the logic of starting him out on the depth chart behind Mario though. Seems to me as if, on passing downs, you'd want both of them on the field.

[Joe Joe]

Originally Posted by HPF Bob

I'm not sure I understand the logic of starting him out on the depth chart behind Mario though. Seems to me as if, on passing downs, you'd want both of them on the field.

I think he is behind Mario because he isn't suited to be on the strongside on running downs. I think he'll see lots of action on passing downs, but I'm not sure if he'll line up strongside or weakside. Mario on the strongside on passing downs would help out if the opponent actually ran the ball on a passing, but putting Mario there would make it easier for him to be chipped.

I sometimes think Bush may start to move Mario around again on passing downs to make the Texans less predictable kind of like what the Texans originally tried with him his rookie season. I'm interested to see what the Texans plan to do on passing downs. I wouldn't be surprised to see Cushing put his hand down in the dirt every now and then as the DTs are off the field.

[painekiller]

Originally Posted by HPF Bob

I suppose I was relieved that we didn't use our first-rounder on a "situational" player like some wanted with Everette Brown. To me, Barwin is an acceptable risk *because* we waited until the second round to take him. I'm not sure I understand the logic of starting him out on the depth chart behind Mario though. Seems to me as if, on passing downs, you'd want both of them on the field.

If you look at depth charts they are for base defenses, they do not have the situational packages in them. I see Barwin as part of the nickle packages, Mario will move to the LDE, Smith becomes LDT, Okoye stays at RDT, and Barwin become the RDE.

The article that dadmg posted last week , they talks about the perfect situation for a player to come into the league. I see this as how Barwin will be brought along. We are finally a team that is maturing and we should be glad that 2nd rounder with talent are no longer must starts. It has only taken us how long?

[Roy P]

Originally Posted by painekiller

If you look at depth charts they are for base defenses, they do not have the situational packages in them. I see Barwin as part of the nickle packages, Mario will move to the LDE, Smith becomes LDT, Okoye stays at RDT, and Barwin become the RDE.

This is a very good read about how I forsee our defense becoming more aggressive and how we'll be using our new toys.


http://www.trojanfootballanalysis.co...z_schemes.html

The first blitz that I am going to show you is what we simply refer to as “Sam and Mike”. We are going to use the strong side linebacker and middle linebackers to rush the passer. We slant our strong side defensive end, nose guard, and 3 technique to the open side of their formation away from their normal rush gaps. The weak side defensive end is going to drop into pass coverage on this play. The alignment is the same as before. The Corners are line up in tight coverage but are going to bail out and play a three deep zone coverage with the Free Safety. The Corners will play outside leverage on this blitz and force everything inside. The Free Safety is playing a deep middle. The weak side Defense End and Strong Safety are the outside defenders to each side. They are playing seam coverage with the Will linebacker in the middle seam. The Strong Safety and weak side Defensive End play what we call the hot receivers to their side. Once the quarterback sees the blitz he’ll often throw to these short areas to his designated hot receiver. If the tight end comes down the middle seam the Strong Safety collapses on him. The Defensive End does the same thing with the back out of the backfield.

What's cool about having Barwin as the "situational" pass rusher is that on those occasions when we have the DE drop in coverage, it won't be a total waste of his talent. He is the DE that I want on the weak side of a formation when we are in passing situations.

[Roy P]

Originally Posted by HPF Bob

I suppose I was relieved that we didn't use our first-rounder on a "situational" player like some wanted with Everette Brown. To me, Barwin is an acceptable risk *because* we waited until the second round to take him. I'm not sure I understand the logic of starting him out on the depth chart behind Mario though. Seems to me as if, on passing downs, you'd want both of them on the field.

1st - I'll say that I was one of those who wanted Everette Brown. I think he'll be more than a "situational" player, but that's an agrument not worth having now.

2nd - Mario starts at the RDE but moves to LDE quite often. So, Barwin would be the guy coming in at RDE when that happens and both of them will be on the field.

[Roy P]

Originally Posted by nunusguy

The problem with Cushing for me is that he may not be as much of an upgrade over Diles at SAM.

Really?

You need to watch Cushing play this season and come back with another assesment.

[Roy P]

Originally Posted by Roy P

Really?

You need to watch Cushing play this season and come back with another assesment.

It does appear that Brian Cushing was able to play the SAM at a higher level than Zac Diles. Now, I'm wondering if we can find a WILL who plays that position better than Diles.

[nunusguy]

Originally Posted by Roy P

It does appear that Brian Cushing was able to play the SAM at a higher level than Zac Diles. Now, I'm wondering if we can find a WILL who plays that position better than Diles.

Hey was I ever wrong about Cushing, but I realized that already back 'bout October.

[painekiller]

Originally Posted by Roy P

It does appear that Brian Cushing was able to play the SAM at a higher level than Zac Diles. Now, I'm wondering if we can find a WILL who plays that position better than Diles.

Weatherspoon would appear to be a perfect fit for this team. He can rush the passer and he is excellent in pass coverage.

I would not be hurt if we drafted Rolando McLain, who IMO can play all three LB position. Adding McLain would do to our WILL what Cush did for our SAM.

[painekiller]

Originally Posted by Blitzwood

pk, this is simply a voluntary exercise of ONE thing you would change, nothing else. I'm not dissecting anyone's draft, just clarifying NOW what one thing anyone would do different, if anything at all, on the record.

I did this because there might be some folks that will come on here mid season and say,"we should have taken Matthews in the first like I wanted" with all their hindsight on display. IMO, If there are any reservations, let's hear them now.

Blitz, I was not complaining about your question, I think it is a fair question. I was pointing out that I thought Rick Smith did a heck of job, and I did not think I was able to add anything to his draft.

BTW that is a major shift for me.

[NBT]

Originally Posted by painekiller

I did not put out a version of my cherry pick for a good reason, Rick Smith did a pretty dang good job with draft.

So instead of dissecting Smith's draft, I decided for me the best thing was to look forward to how these guys and the new defensive coordinator change the 2009 Texans. I'm am not going to cry about the ones that got away this time.

And for me that is a new leaf.

Well, good for you PK. And to tell the truth, I feel the same way. I know I initially questioned Glover Quinn, because to be honest, I had never heard of him.

[painekiller]

Originally Posted by painekiller

I did not put out a version of my cherry pick for a good reason, Rick Smith did a pretty dang good job with draft.

So instead of dissecting Smith's draft, I decided for me the best thing was to look forward to how these guys and the new defensive coordinator change the 2009 Texans. I'm am not going to cry about the ones that got away this time.

And for me that is a new leaf.

OK I've changed my mind.

1st Maclin WR Missouri
2nd Barwin
3rd Caldwell
4th a Quinn
4th b Tolar CB St. Paul
5th Casey
6th Follett, Zack OLB Cal.
7th Jennings, Rashad RB Liberty

UDFA I would have added to our signings
PJ Hill RB Wisconsin (predraft arrest hurt his stock, charges have been dropped)
Ian Johnson RB Boise St.
Ryan Purvis TE Boston College


So overall I would say I liked the job Smith did, just a few changes to BPA, as Roy kept telling us, Maclin is a stud. Add him to our guys and lookout. JJ is gone. And Walters is let go after the season.

[Roy P]

Good thing we didn't draft Andre Brown, he just destroyed his Achilles tendon.

[NBT]

Aw shucks PK, and you looked so good in that new leaf!

[mussop]

Love our draft but if I were GM =
1st Michael Oher OT,
2nd Max Unger C,
3rd Tyrone McKenzie OLB,
4th Chip Vaughn S,
4th L Sidbury DE,
5th J Casey TE,
6th Follett, Zack OLB Cal.
7th Jennings, Rashad RB Liberty