IntheBullseye.com  

Go Back   IntheBullseye.com > Hot Reads ...In the Bullseye > The Texans

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-28-2009, 08:51 AM
Joe Joe Joe Joe is offline
Veteran Depth
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 170
Default Run defense improved?

Last year, I thought the strongside of the defense was pretty porous last year, especially earlier in the year. Granted, Diles had a couple of good games. The weakside tended to be pretty strong due a lot to Mario.

This offseason, the Texans add two players to the front seven on the strongside in Cushing and Smith. The Texans gave up a 122 ypg and 4.5 per carry.

Is Cushing and Smith enough to get the Texans to being a top ten run defense team (4.0 ypc or less and 100 ypg or less)?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-28-2009, 09:08 AM
dalemurphy dalemurphy is offline
Regular Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 259
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Joe Joe View Post
Last year, I thought the strongside of the defense was pretty porous last year, especially earlier in the year. Granted, Diles had a couple of good games. The weakside tended to be pretty strong due a lot to Mario.

This offseason, the Texans add two players to the front seven on the strongside in Cushing and Smith. The Texans gave up a 122 ypg and 4.5 per carry.

Is Cushing and Smith enough to get the Texans to being a top ten run defense team (4.0 ypc or less and 100 ypg or less)?
if you factor in the improved coaching staff, maybe! I certainly think the LB position will be an asset for us, especially given the great depth we have there now. I think the real question for the run defense is how the DTs play. Hopefully Bush and Kollar improve their play a great deal.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-28-2009, 11:35 AM
jppaul jppaul is offline
Regular Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 343
Default

I think the best addition for the run defense is Cushing. The biggest weakness in the run defense was Diles who got washed out on alot of plays on the strong side. He wasn't strong enough for the point of attack and is a much better fit on the weakside. Cushing is a much stronger run defender, take on blocks and blow up offensive linemen, tight ends and fullbacks.

An excerpt from his draft card:

Can be overaggressive at times, which leads to some false steps and poor pursuit angles. However, he flies around the field and is a sideline-to-sideline run supporter. His motor is always revving. He is strong and shows the ability to hold ground when teams run at him. Uses strong hands and powerful upper body (30 reps on the bench) to stack the edge and rip off of blocks. He is a punishing striker with explosive short-area power.

http://insider.espn.go.com/nfldraft/...4453&year=2009
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 04-29-2009, 03:09 PM
NBT NBT is offline
Pro Bowler
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: S.E. Texas Coast
Posts: 1,836
Default

Cushing obviously upgrades the SAM. We should be two games better just by the fact that we now have a defensive strategy to blow-up the run, and get after the QB on passing plays. But don't expect too much too soon. There has been so many new faces added to the defense that it will be awhile to get them all on the same page.
__________________
NBT - Elder statesman. Wisdom comes with age - Now if i could remember what it was!
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 04-29-2009, 06:04 PM
Joe Joe Joe Joe is offline
Veteran Depth
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 170
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by NBT View Post
There has been so many new faces added to the defense that it will be awhile to get them all on the same page.
I can see this. It just seemed certain teams could just run at will to the strongside. I'm happy with Dunta and whoever comes out of Reeves, Molden, and Bennett as the other CB. I'm hoping the defense as a whole gets to average this season, but see the front seven as the key to improvement.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 04-29-2009, 06:25 PM
Roy P Roy P is offline
All-Pro
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,761
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by NBT View Post
Cushing obviously upgrades the SAM. We should be two games better just by the fact that we now have a defensive strategy to blow-up the run, and get after the QB on passing plays. But don't expect too much too soon. There has been so many new faces added to the defense that it will be awhile to get them all on the same page.
I am very excited about the potential and the reported new philosophy of the defense. The execution of catching the RB after he was 3 - 5 yards past the line of scrimmage was brutal to watch. What I'm looking forward to is penetrating DTs making TFLs and a punishing tackler like Cushing dropping RBs when he meets them in the hole.

What worries me is DeMeco Ryans' ability to get off of blocks from the OL and whoever plays the WILL to make stops in the running game. The FS will need to be more of a factor in the run defense, in my opinion. Now if Okoye and Mario can attack, that may be less of a concern as they tally more stops. As for the CBs, including Glover Quinn, they will be called upon to support the run. That's what I like about having Corners who are 200+lbs who can tackle. I'm also optimistic about what Troy Nolan brings to the table.

In terms of the passing game defense, we have upgraded the pass rush with Barwin. Hopefully, if we can stop the run and create more 3rd and longs, then an improved pass rush will become even more beneficial. The idea of an attacking defense is a little more risky, however, if executed properly, it can create huge dividends.
__________________
Originally Posted by chuck
I'm just sitting here thinking (pacing, actually) that whatever my issues with Kubiak he is apparently a goddam genius at tutoring quarterbacks.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 04-29-2009, 11:04 PM
Nconroe Nconroe is offline
All-Pro
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Lake Conroe
Posts: 2,897
Default

when Texans defense coach says attack style, does that imply do what Philadelphia is doing? they always seem to have a fairly high rated defense. they blitz a lot on any down with any set of players and play man-man with CBs a lot.

or is this more of a tampa 2 style attack which is less blitzing, but lots of team speed and all players flowing to the ball. one gap by DL without blitz. I think these are 4-3 styles.

either way, it will be exciting to watch and way different from what we've been watching. by attacking they force offense to do the reacting is the goal. I'm real optimistic the new coaches and style of play should motivte the defensive players to get in on the action with an aggressive attitude.

Last edited by Nconroe; 04-29-2009 at 11:19 PM.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:20 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.