![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
File this under "Uh oh".
Quote:
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
First Amobi had maturity issues. Then, Amobi had ankle issues. Now, Amobi has knee issues. Draft Jerry and give Amobi competition issues.
Last edited by nero THE zero; 04-15-2009 at 02:47 PM. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jerry is not the answer, if you are going to draft a UT in this draft it should be Ziggy Hood.
__________________
There is no failure, only feedback. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Neither is the Hood.
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Okoye is running out of excuses - maybe his biggest problem is plain ole bust issues ?
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
This is a big year for Amobi. I realize he's young and DTs take a while to develop but we have to start getting more from him or he needs to see his playing time reduced.
There is one thing that I wish some reporter would ask Kubiak. I think it was Mario who finally divulged that the DL was basically instructed to read and react rather than attack. I want to know if this was their first choice in defensive philosophy or one born out of necessity. I also would like to know when they decided to implement this philosophy. The reason I ask is if this was already our ingrained DL philosophy before Amobi's draft, why draft him? Putting him in a read and react defense negates the only trait that made him a first rounder; namely, quickness to shoot the gap. There seems as though there may have been a disconnect between defensive philosophy and drafting players who could implement it. I would really like to see a better explanation of these sorts of things from Kubiak because right now, it looks like we drafted a gap shooter who's not particularly strong at the point of attack and then forced him to play to his weaknesses. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
__________________
There is no failure, only feedback. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
|
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|