![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
With the iffy situation developing in Philly, would you guys be interested in bringing him in for 2009 should he become available? Seems like he'd be a perfect QB for what Kubiak wants to do. He would finally have an excellent #1 again, and solid WRs to go along. He would also have a Westbrook-ish (in terms of ability to catch out of the backfield) RB in Slaton as well.
What do you guys think? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I'd rather have their Defensive Coordinator.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Anyone who even considers wanting McNabb on this team should look at the media circus that would surround him here. Would you seriously want all THAT surrounding our team? I certainly wouldn't.
![]() |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Better than Favre's media circus.
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
A media circus is a media circus. Farve has a bigger media circus because he is a better QB than McNabb. Dont believe me look atthe stats.
McNabb this year running the same offense for 10 years rat 81.1 yds 2,770 td 14 int 10 Farve this year on a new team learning a new system rat 94.1 yds 2,461 td 20 int 13 In the last 3 games Farve has thrown 5 tds 1 int In the last 3 games McNabb hs thrown 4 tds 6 int Farve is settleing in and getting better and LEADING his team to a playoff spot while McNabb is about to be benched and later cut for making too many bad decisions. I guess the "media circus" wasnt as big of a deal as you thought it was. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Wait until he holds the team hostage because he doesn't know whether he wants to retire or not.
McNabb fits our system. Perfectly. |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|